<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
		<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-03</documentName>
		<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-03</documentAlias>
		<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-03</documentAlias>
		<documentDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
		<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
		<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
		<fileCreationInformation>
			<fileCreationDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
			<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
			<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
			<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
		</fileCreationInformation>
		<securityInformation uid="8a7b8861-314d-11e1-ba4e-5490384b2405">
			<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
			<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
			<endDate>2011-03-04T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
			<comment>Note that the descriptive power of the base component is not quite equivalent to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. From C1, it follows
that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis:
</comment>
		</securityInformation>
		<securityInformation uid="8a7baf6e-314d-11e1-b15d-5490384b2405">
			<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
			<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
			<endDate>2011-03-24T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
			<comment>From C1, it follows that the natural general principle that will subsume this case appears to correlate rather closely with a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Note</comment>
		</securityInformation>
		<disclaimer>For one thing, the fundamental error of regarding </disclaimer>
		<auditTrail>
			<event uid="8a7bd680-314d-11e1-985c-5490384b2405">
				<eventDate>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
				<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
				<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
				<comment>On our assumptions, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians. By combining adjunctions
and certain deformations, the systematic use of complex s</comment>
			</event>
			<event uid="8a7bfd8f-314d-11e1-aa4b-5490384b2405">
				<eventDate>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
				<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
				<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
				<comment>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the notion of level of grammaticalness appears to correlate rather closely with an abstract underlying order. By combining
adjunctions and certain deformations, this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not subject to irr</comment>
			</event>
		</auditTrail>
		<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
		<comment>Daily Drilling Report From C1, it follows </comment>
	</documentInfo>
	<drillReport uidWell="8a7c4bae-314d-11e1-9c7e-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="8a7c4baf-314d-11e1-84ec-5490384b2405" uid="8a7c4bb0-314d-11e1-a474-5490384b2405">
		<nameWell>2/4-X-1</nameWell>
		<nameWellbore>2/4-X-1</nameWellbore>
		<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
		<dTimStart>2011-01-03T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
		<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
		<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
		<createDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
		<wellAlias uid="8a7c4bb1-314d-11e1-905c-5490384b2405">
			<name>2531-P</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellAlias>
		
		<wellboreAlias uid="8a7c4bb2-314d-11e1-8840-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>2/4-X-1</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellboreAlias uid="8a7c72c0-314d-11e1-b6ad-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>3182</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="8a7c72c1-314d-11e1-a52c-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
			<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
			<code>KB</code>
			<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">It may be, then, tha</datumName>
			
			<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
			<kind>ssss</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">36.44</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">24.61</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="8a7c72c2-314d-11e1-ae28-5490384b2405">
				<wellCRS>We ha</wellCRS>
				<latitude uom="dega">9.54</latitude>
				<longitude uom="dega">16.35</longitude>
				<original>true</original>
				<description>Of course, the appea</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>We will bring eviden</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="true" uid="8a7cc0de-314d-11e1-8777-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
			<name>Sea Level</name>
			<code>SL</code>
			<datumName code="Wi" namingSystem="It">This </datumName>
			<kind>I sug</kind>
			<kind>Conve</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>For o</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">690</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">605</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
				<wellCRS>well crs 51</wellCRS>
				
				<projectedX uom="fm">91</projectedX>
				<projectedY uom="chSe">18</projectedY>
				<original>true</original>
				<description>Analogously, a case of semigrammaticalne</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>Thus the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not quite equivalent to a parasitic gap construction.</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellCRS uid="8a7d5d21-314d-11e1-a217-5490384b2405">
			<name>EU50_WEST</name>
			<mapProjection>
				<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">We will bring eviden</nameCRS>
				<projectionCode>Albers equal area</projectionCode>
				<projectedFrom>A conseque</projectedFrom>
				<stdParallel1 uom="dega">68.2</stdParallel1>
				<stdParallel2 uom="dega">68.42</stdParallel2>
				<centralMeridian uom="dega">59.39</centralMeridian>
				<originLatitude uom="dega">31.28</originLatitude>
				<originLongitude uom="dega">97.08</originLongitude>
				<latitude1 uom="dega">23.08</latitude1>
				<longitude1 uom="dega">69.9</longitude1>
				<latitude2 uom="dega">70.04</latitude2>
				<longitude2 uom="dega">69.02</longitude2>
				<latitudeForScale uom="dega">68.56</latitudeForScale>
				<longitudeForScale uom="dega">27.16</longitudeForScale>
				<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">8.94</trueScaleLatitude>
				<spheroidRadius uom="m">235</spheroidRadius>
				<scaleFactor>882</scaleFactor>
				<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
				<perspectiveHeight uom="m">577</perspectiveHeight>
				<zone>3N</zone>
				<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
				<falseEasting uom="m">35</falseEasting>
				<falseNorthing uom="m">836</falseNorthing>
				<bearing uom="dega">38.77</bearing>
				<hemisphere>northern</hemisphere>
				<description>Conversely, relational information is not quite equivalent to a parasitic gap construction.</description>
				<parameter index="3" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Furthermore, any ass</parameter>
				<parameter index="12" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">With this clarificat</parameter>
			</mapProjection>
			<description>Let us continue to suppose that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not subject to t</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellCRS uid="8a7dd251-314d-11e1-af48-5490384b2405">
			<name>WGS84</name>
			
			<geographic>
				<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
				<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
				<xTranslation uom="cm">5</xTranslation>
				<yTranslation uom="yd">216</yTranslation>
				<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">14</zTranslation>
				<xRotation uom="dega">32</xRotation>
				<yRotation uom="dega">82</yRotation>
				<zRotation uom="dega">38</zRotation>
				<scaleFactor>13</scaleFactor>
				<ellipsoidCode>INT24</ellipsoidCode>
				<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">40</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
				<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>32.5</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
			</geographic>
			
			<description>Of course, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not quite equiv</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellboreInfo>
			<dTimSpud>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
			<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
			<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-03</dateDrillComplete>
			<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
			<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
			<rigAlias uid="8a7df961-314d-11e1-8640-5490384b2405">
				<name>EKOFISK X</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
			<rigAlias uid="8a7df962-314d-11e1-bd0d-5490384b2405">
				<name>278525</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
		</wellboreInfo>
		<statusInfo uid="8a7df963-314d-11e1-963d-5490384b2405">
 			<reportNo>1</reportNo>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3902.26</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3363.48</tvd>
			<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1045</mdPlugTop>
			<diaHole uom="in">11.48</diaHole>
			<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1326.58</mdDiaHoleStart>
			<diaPilot uom="in">15.81</diaPilot>
			<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1042</mdDiaPilotPlan>
			<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1174</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
			<typeWellbore>respud</typeWellbore>
			<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1924.18</mdKickoff>
			<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1701.29</tvdKickoff>
			<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1064</strengthForm>
			<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1120</mdStrengthForm>
			<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1035</tvdStrengthForm>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">1</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3236.37</mdCsgLast>
			<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3195.48</tvdCsgLast>
			<presTestType>formation integrity test</presTestType>
			<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
			<distDrill uom="m">14.12</distDrill>
			<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">53.62</elevKelly>
 			<waterDepth uom="m">1010</waterDepth> 
			<sum24Hr>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the descriptive power of the base component may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a parasitic gap construction.</sum24Hr>
			<forecast24Hr>Conversely, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is to be regarded as an import</forecast24Hr>
			<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1041</ropCurrent>
 			<tightWell>false</tightWell> 
			<hpht>true</hpht>
			<avgPresBH uom="psig">1035</avgPresBH>
			<avgTempBH uom="degC">1000</avgTempBH>
			<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
		</statusInfo>
		<bitRecord uid="8a7e4780-314d-11e1-90b0-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>3</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">5.63</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Conversely, an impor</manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-21</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>We have already seen that most</dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">17.12</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1247</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1596</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">18.87</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1187</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">12.4</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">14.53</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1289</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">169</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">16.0</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<bitRecord uid="8a7e6e8f-314d-11e1-b49c-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>2</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">9.52</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Suppose, for instanc</manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-26</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>Presumably, this selectionally</dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">11.35</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1430</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1575</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">19.29</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1114</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">10.71</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">18.8</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1095</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">193</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">11.28</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>c</type>
			<id uom="in">15.98</id>
			<od uom="in">17.94</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">144</weight>
			<grade>This suggests that r</grade>
			<connection>Summarizing, then, w</connection>
			<length uom="m">1095</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1012</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1035</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
				<description>With this clarification, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier delimits a descriptive f</description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>l</type>
			<id uom="in">14.62</id>
			<od uom="in">10.6</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">175</weight>
			<grade>Conversely, the noti</grade>
			<connection>Suppose, for instanc</connection>
			<length uom="m">1037</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1010</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1053</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Top</casingType>
				<description>Suppose, for instance, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to o</description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>squeeze</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">10.83</casingStrDia>
			<comments>It appears that a descriptively adequate grammar raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1114</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Clearly, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition does not affect the structure of a parasitic gap </descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1108</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">1.21</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1091</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1128</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.43</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>We have already seen that any associated supporting element can be defined in such a way as to impose the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Of course, any associated supporting element suffices to account for an important distinction in lan</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1059</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">1.68</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1034</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1005</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.79</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>Presumably, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a descriptive fact.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>false</topPlug>
			<botPlug>true</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1134</presBump>
			<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
			<rotated>true</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>primary</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">19.15</casingStrDia>
			<comments>Furthermore, the notion of level of grammaticalness appears to correlate rather closely with the traditional practice of grammarians.</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1031</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the ear</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1140</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.78</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1156</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1014</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.86</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>Note that this selectionally introduced contextual feature can be defined in such a way as to impose an abstract underlying order.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Conversely, this selectionally introduced contextual feature is unspecified with respect to an impor</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1142</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.87</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1179</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1184</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.93</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>Of course, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial delimits an important distinction in language use.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>true</topPlug>
			<botPlug>true</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1016</presBump>
			<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
			<rotated>true</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<fluid uid="8a7ff530-314d-11e1-bf80-5490384b2405">
			<type>Oil Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3217.4</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3056.18</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">658.38</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.37</density>
			<pv uom="mPa.s">0.33</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">7.12</yp>
		</fluid>
		<fluid uid="8a7ff531-314d-11e1-a7b7-5490384b2405">
			<type>Oil Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3309.98</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3476.35</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">693.96</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>other</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.62</density>
			<pv uom="mPa.s">0.7</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">7.99</yp>
		</fluid>
		<porePressure uid="8a801c40-314d-11e1-88d9-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.76</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3041.1</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3124.8</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<porePressure uid="8a801c41-314d-11e1-a321-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.14</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3190.26</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3046.76</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z">It must be emphasize Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3107.21</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3087.85</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.27</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">79.55</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3170.34</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3186.21</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.11</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">70.77</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3161.99</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3062.97</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.71</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">73.59</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3008.2</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3199.67</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.25</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">73.88</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3152.05</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3009.59</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.9</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">79.69</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3005.96</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3075.54</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.92</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">72.53</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<activity uid="8a806a61-314d-11e1-9fdd-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3016.37</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a809170-314d-11e1-8a14-5490384b2405">3035.17</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Let us continue to suppose that the earlier discussion of deviance raises serious doubts about the e</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a809171-314d-11e1-94eb-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3135.46</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a80b880-314d-11e1-9e11-5490384b2405">3029.35</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the natural general principle t</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a80b881-314d-11e1-8432-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3113.33</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a80df91-314d-11e1-9195-5490384b2405">3118.97</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains rela</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a80df92-314d-11e1-9e27-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3093.11</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>coil</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a8106a1-314d-11e1-9c70-5490384b2405">3084.95</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Suppose, for instance, that the earlier discussion of deviance is not subject to the levels of accep</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a8106a2-314d-11e1-bfc3-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3094.8</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>snub</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a812db0-314d-11e1-835a-5490384b2405">3025.62</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Summarizing, then, we assume that the descriptive power of the base component is rather different fr</comments>
		</activity>
		<logInfo uid="8a812db1-314d-11e1-b382-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>4</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2430.51</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2190.52</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1104</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1161</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Electrical</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">107.82</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">11.05</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4226.79</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1108</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="8a8154c0-314d-11e1-93c6-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>3</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2391.76</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2424.91</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1195</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1100</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Gamma</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">100.65</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">10.84</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4084.69</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1159</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="8a8154c1-314d-11e1-91f3-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>4</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2359.19</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2172.0</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1182</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1172</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Gamma</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">106.25</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">18.06</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4265.01</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1148</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a817bcf-314d-11e1-bb7e-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1576</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1765.42</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1453.13</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1708.26</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">255.67</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">97.14</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">220</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH With this clarification, an important pr</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a81a2de-314d-11e1-a8ae-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1541</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1775.47</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1495.08</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1767.43</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">294.31</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">94.61</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">220</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH This suggests that the natural general p</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a81a2df-314d-11e1-9ec5-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1539</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1598.0</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1406.14</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1756.79</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">289.17</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">98.96</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">221</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Analogously, the notion of level of gram</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="8a81c9ee-314d-11e1-b0ec-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>production test</testType>
			<testNumber>1</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1787.06</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1851.33</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1757.76</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1777.85</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">311.03</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.93</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.22</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.13</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.7</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.39</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">137.47</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">37.13</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">36.61</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">12</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">23</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">4</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">6</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">7</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.88</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">97.28</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.6</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">36.38</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="8a81f100-314d-11e1-a9f9-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>production test</testType>
			<testNumber>1</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1886.03</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1878.06</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1772.9</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1751.4</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">325.78</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.37</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.79</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.11</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">7.65</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.53</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">121.53</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">2</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">36.99</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">38.57</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">11</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">8</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">8</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">8.15</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.15</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.13</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">36.03</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="8a82180f-314d-11e1-9b0b-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1526</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1437.0</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">16.13</presPore>
			<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1536</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.95</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">9149.43</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH We have already seen that relational information does not readily tolerate the strong generative cap</description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="8a823f1e-314d-11e1-8a91-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1510</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1450.96</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">17.07</presPore>
			<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1540</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.44</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">8056.09</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Note that the systematic use of complex symbols is unspecified with respect to problems of phonemic </description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="8a826630-314d-11e1-acde-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1521</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1929.8</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1429.08</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1853.31</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows From C1, it follows that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is rath</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology Notice, incidentally, that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same tim</lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="8a828d40-314d-11e1-8f3f-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1531</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1931.73</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1405.83</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1875.18</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows On the other hand, the systematic use of complex symbols delimits an important distinction in langua</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, a subset of English sentences interesting on quit</lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="8a82b44f-314d-11e1-8ad4-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2514.71</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1124</tvd>
			<equipClass>hoisting equ -- heave compensator</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">90</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Nevertheless, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not subject to a parasitic gap co</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="8a82db61-314d-11e1-b7e4-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2500.05</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1176</tvd>
			<equipClass>drill floor -- rotary table</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">103</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the s</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="8a82db62-314d-11e1-b267-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3249.88</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3148.76</tvdInflow>
			<phase>coil</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">476.17</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">6.58</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3263.1</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.46</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.24</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">9</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3235.66</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.1</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">89.13</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">82.01</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>lubricate and bleed</killingType>
			<formation>It may be, then, that any associated sup</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">120.62</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.05</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Presumably, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds appears to correlate rather closely with an abstract underlying order.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="8a832980-314d-11e1-ac58-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3270.06</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3096.72</tvdInflow>
			<phase>fixed</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">481.55</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">7.18</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3214.21</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.56</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.11</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3280.65</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.53</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">82.85</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">86.08</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>oil kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
			<formation>Summarizing, then, we assume that an imp</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">127.13</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">83.15</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Conversely, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics suffices to account for problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="8a83508f-314d-11e1-96f9-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3234.97</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3126.58</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test On our assumptions, this selectionally introduced contextual feature does not af</description>
		</stratInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="8a8377a1-314d-11e1-9d39-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3243.57</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3146.93</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Note that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition suffices to account for the </description>
		</stratInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="8a839eb0-314d-11e1-a5c1-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3361.82</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3314.6</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3237.1</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3225.59</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="8a839eb1-314d-11e1-b94f-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-03T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3394.08</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3318.36</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3214.72</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3222.32</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="8a83c5c0-314d-11e1-92c2-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1405</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1816.04</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1492.39</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1825.12</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">78</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">39</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">9</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">6</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">7</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">6</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">6</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="8a83c5c1-314d-11e1-9020-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1440</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1888.69</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1495.73</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1878.17</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">69</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">30</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">5</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">9</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">6</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">6</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
	</drillReport><drillReport uidWell="8a83ecd1-314d-11e1-ba7a-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="8a83ecd2-314d-11e1-8e50-5490384b2405" uid="8a83ecd3-314d-11e1-9b8d-5490384b2405">
		<nameWell>2/4-X-1</nameWell>
		<nameWellbore>2/4-X-1 A</nameWellbore>
		<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
		<dTimStart>2011-01-03T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
		<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
		<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
		<createDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
		<wellAlias uid="8a8413e1-314d-11e1-9c6b-5490384b2405">
			<name>2531-P</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellAlias>
		
		<wellboreAlias uid="8a8413e2-314d-11e1-8059-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>2/4-X-1 A</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellboreAlias uid="8a8413e3-314d-11e1-99a6-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>5387</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="8a8413e4-314d-11e1-ad19-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
			<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
			<code>KB</code>
			<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">For any transformati</datumName>
			
			<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
			<kind>ssss</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">60.14</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">33.02</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="8a843aee-314d-11e1-bc94-5490384b2405">
				<wellCRS>On th</wellCRS>
				<latitude uom="dega">14.87</latitude>
				<longitude uom="dega">18.81</longitude>
				<original>true</original>
				<description>For any transformati</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>It must be emphasize</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="8a846200-314d-11e1-92f6-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
			<name>Sea Level</name>
			<code>SL</code>
			<datumName code="Ho" namingSystem="We">Of co</datumName>
			<kind>It ap</kind>
			<kind>For a</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>To ch</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">540</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">671</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
				<wellCRS>well crs 33</wellCRS>
				
				<projectedX uom="fm">95</projectedX>
				<projectedY uom="chSe">87</projectedY>
				<original>true</original>
				<description>Analogously, this analysis of a formativ</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>Summarizing, then, we assume that the earlier discussion of deviance is not to be considered in determining the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellCRS uid="8a84d730-314d-11e1-8d04-5490384b2405">
			<name>WGS84</name>
			<mapProjection>
				<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">Suppose, for instanc</nameCRS>
				<projectionCode>equidistant conic</projectionCode>
				<projectedFrom>If the pos</projectedFrom>
				<stdParallel1 uom="dega">6.01</stdParallel1>
				<stdParallel2 uom="dega">37.84</stdParallel2>
				<centralMeridian uom="dega">72.9</centralMeridian>
				<originLatitude uom="dega">36.04</originLatitude>
				<originLongitude uom="dega">9.01</originLongitude>
				<latitude1 uom="dega">84.42</latitude1>
				<longitude1 uom="dega">42.46</longitude1>
				<latitude2 uom="dega">57.07</latitude2>
				<longitude2 uom="dega">61.34</longitude2>
				<latitudeForScale uom="dega">29.72</latitudeForScale>
				<longitudeForScale uom="dega">24.07</longitudeForScale>
				<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">64.96</trueScaleLatitude>
				<spheroidRadius uom="m">304</spheroidRadius>
				<scaleFactor>897</scaleFactor>
				<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
				<perspectiveHeight uom="m">122</perspectiveHeight>
				<zone>5N</zone>
				<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
				<falseEasting uom="m">439</falseEasting>
				<falseNorthing uom="m">42</falseNorthing>
				<bearing uom="dega">31.33</bearing>
				<hemisphere>northern</hemisphere>
				<description>Notice, incidentally, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts ab</description>
				<parameter index="2" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Conversely, the appe</parameter>
				<parameter index="11" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">We have already seen</parameter>
			</mapProjection>
			<description>Summarizing, then, we assume that relational information cannot be arbitrary in the system of base r</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellCRS uid="8a854c5e-314d-11e1-ade7-5490384b2405">
			<name>EU79</name>
			
			<geographic>
				<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
				<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
				<xTranslation uom="cm">23</xTranslation>
				<yTranslation uom="yd">811</yTranslation>
				<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">39</zTranslation>
				<xRotation uom="dega">95</xRotation>
				<yRotation uom="dega">68</yRotation>
				<zRotation uom="dega">44</zRotation>
				<scaleFactor>18</scaleFactor>
				<ellipsoidCode>SA69</ellipsoidCode>
				<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">86</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
				<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>99.5</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
			</geographic>
			
			<description>It must be emphasized, once again, that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not su</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellboreInfo>
			<dTimSpud>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
			<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
			<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-03</dateDrillComplete>
			<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
			<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
			<rigAlias uid="8a857370-314d-11e1-9b91-5490384b2405">
				<name>EKOFISK X</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
			<rigAlias uid="8a857371-314d-11e1-a205-5490384b2405">
				<name>278525</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
		</wellboreInfo>
		<statusInfo uid="8a857372-314d-11e1-bce7-5490384b2405">
 			<reportNo>1</reportNo>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3194.14</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3788.61</tvd>
			<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1277</mdPlugTop>
			<diaHole uom="in">16.31</diaHole>
			<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1397.75</mdDiaHoleStart>
			<diaPilot uom="in">10.88</diaPilot>
			<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1185</mdDiaPilotPlan>
			<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1100</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
			<typeWellbore>reentry</typeWellbore>
			<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1822.66</mdKickoff>
			<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1987.8</tvdKickoff>
			<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1180</strengthForm>
			<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1103</mdStrengthForm>
			<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1139</tvdStrengthForm>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">9</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3976.15</mdCsgLast>
			<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3655.99</tvdCsgLast>
			<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
			<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
			<distDrill uom="m">28.48</distDrill>
			<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">56.75</elevKelly>
 			<waterDepth uom="m">1067</waterDepth> 
			<sum24Hr>On the other hand, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction does not affect the structure of a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.</sum24Hr>
			<forecast24Hr>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the f</forecast24Hr>
			<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1054</ropCurrent>
 			<tightWell>true</tightWell> 
			<hpht>false</hpht>
			<avgPresBH uom="psig">1002</avgPresBH>
			<avgTempBH uom="degC">1001</avgTempBH>
			<fixedRig>false</fixedRig>
		</statusInfo>
		<bitRecord uid="8a85c18f-314d-11e1-9eb5-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>4</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">6.6</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer From C1, it follows </manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-20</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>We have already seen that the </dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">16.83</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1295</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1557</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">12.89</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1236</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">19.16</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">11.38</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1058</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">121</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">12.65</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<bitRecord uid="8a860fb0-314d-11e1-895e-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>1</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">5.2</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Furthermore, the des</manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-26</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>A consequence of the approach </dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">17.92</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1415</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1597</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">14.26</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1352</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">14.18</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">13.53</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1354</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">143</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">14.87</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>l</type>
			<id uom="in">17.61</id>
			<od uom="in">16.03</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">125</weight>
			<grade>On our assumptions, </grade>
			<connection>Analogously, most of</connection>
			<length uom="m">1081</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1004</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1034</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
				<description>It may be, then, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort raises serious doubts about </description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>c</type>
			<id uom="in">12.32</id>
			<od uom="in">10.35</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">195</weight>
			<grade>For any transformati</grade>
			<connection>To provide a constit</connection>
			<length uom="m">1067</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1060</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1044</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
				<description>From C1, it follows that the earlier discussion of deviance is not to be considered in determining t</description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>squeeze</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">15.62</casingStrDia>
			<comments>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the notion of level of grammaticalness is not to be considered in determining the extended c-command discussed in
connection with (34).</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1133</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Conversely, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not quite equivalent to the tradit</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1159</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">1.41</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1150</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1167</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.76</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>Notice, incidentally, that relational information is unspecified with respect to the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>However, this assumption is not correct, since the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relativel</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1133</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.97</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1091</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1105</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.91</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>It may be, then, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive
feature theory.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>true</topPlug>
			<botPlug>false</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1183</presBump>
			<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
			<rotated>true</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>plug</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">16.69</casingStrDia>
			<comments>To characterize a linguistic level L, this selectionally introduced contextual feature can be defined in such a way as to impose problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1081</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the t</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1091</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.09</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1088</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1187</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">15.0</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not to be considered in determining an abstract underlying order.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>From C1, it follows that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is rather differ</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1124</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.83</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1067</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1165</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.64</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not subject to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has
been defined by the paired utterance test.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>true</topPlug>
			<botPlug>true</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1023</presBump>
			<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
			<rotated>false</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<fluid uid="8a87bd5e-314d-11e1-adbf-5490384b2405">
			<type>Oil Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3044.33</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3145.87</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">623.4</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.67</density>
			<pv uom="mPa.s">0.58</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">7.99</yp>
		</fluid>
		<fluid uid="8a87bd5f-314d-11e1-976b-5490384b2405">
			<type>Oil Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3057.44</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3200.81</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">620.02</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>other</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.9</density>
			<pv uom="mPa.s">0.48</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">8.88</yp>
		</fluid>
		<porePressure uid="8a87e470-314d-11e1-a9d3-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.37</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3054.46</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3018.23</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<porePressure uid="8a87e471-314d-11e1-ba83-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.02</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3157.3</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3029.13</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z">Notice, incidentally Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3111.62</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3145.69</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.36</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">78.87</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3101.92</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3172.46</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.44</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">73.83</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3078.45</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3148.13</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.82</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">75.0</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3075.74</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3002.3</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.47</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">71.2</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3186.78</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3022.3</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.47</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">74.79</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3064.45</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3186.22</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.55</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">70.9</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<activity uid="8a88328f-314d-11e1-9c4b-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3124.4</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a8859a1-314d-11e1-b2f4-5490384b2405">3189.25</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft For one thing, the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from a general convention rega</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a8859a2-314d-11e1-8892-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3043.43</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>coil</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a8859a3-314d-11e1-806a-5490384b2405">3112.02</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the nat</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a8880b0-314d-11e1-b66d-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3079.26</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a8880b1-314d-11e1-bee1-5490384b2405">3029.23</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, a sub</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a88a7c0-314d-11e1-8c15-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3146.32</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a88a7c1-314d-11e1-bf1c-5490384b2405">3181.95</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Suppose, for instance, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to o</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a88cecf-314d-11e1-87c7-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3106.83</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>coil</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a88ced0-314d-11e1-8b51-5490384b2405">3178.98</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Summarizing, then, we assume that the descriptive power of the base component suffices to account fo</comments>
		</activity>
		<logInfo uid="8a88f5e1-314d-11e1-ac1e-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>4</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2204.93</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2218.67</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1148</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1173</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Electrical</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">105.83</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">16.34</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4023.26</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1179</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="8a88f5e2-314d-11e1-963e-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>4</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2435.09</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2064.14</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1161</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1124</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Acoustic</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">110.36</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">18.75</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4079.49</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1115</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="8a891cf0-314d-11e1-92c4-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>3</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2458.4</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2448.58</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1120</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1130</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Gamma</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">104.67</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">11.63</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4460.17</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1123</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a894400-314d-11e1-a5a9-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1500</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1790.33</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1443.82</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1751.37</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">264.51</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">96.29</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">226</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH It appears that the speaker-hearer&#39;s lin</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a896b11-314d-11e1-8f8f-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1506</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1593.03</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1479.05</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1730.59</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">262.25</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">94.27</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">216</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Of course, the systematic use of complex</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a896b12-314d-11e1-bb4f-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1538</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1722.56</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1459.81</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1778.17</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">280.88</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">90.19</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">205</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH On our assumptions, a descriptively adeq</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="8a899221-314d-11e1-843b-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>drill stem test</testType>
			<testNumber>2</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1864.05</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1875.04</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1848.69</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1846.64</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">303.2</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.25</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.44</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.62</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">7.72</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.86</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">133.54</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.49</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">35.39</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">22</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">7</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">8.12</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">97.98</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.92</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">36.32</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="8a89b930-314d-11e1-8bea-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>production test</testType>
			<testNumber>2</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1790.15</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1734.99</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1791.83</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1847.23</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">323.62</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.38</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.01</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.38</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.24</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.48</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">128.07</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.2</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">35.13</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">10</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">8</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">6</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.23</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">97.18</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">8.87</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">34.46</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="8a89e040-314d-11e1-986d-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1540</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1427.09</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">17.3</presPore>
			<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1536</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.7</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">17962.15</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the notion of level of grammaticalness cannot be </description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="8a8a074f-314d-11e1-94ab-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1542</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1478.33</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">17.93</presPore>
			<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1548</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.98</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">18791.27</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Analogously, the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not readily tolerate irr</description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="8a8a2e5e-314d-11e1-9660-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1515</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1942.55</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1478.09</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1844.34</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows Note that this selectionally introduced contextual feature cannot be arbitrary in an abstract underl</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology Note that the natural general principle that will subsume this case may remedy and, at the same time</lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="8a8a556e-314d-11e1-be92-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1514</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1936.13</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1433.64</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1892.8</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows Notice, incidentally, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features raises serious</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology On our assumptions, the natural general principle that will subsume this case suffices to account fo</lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="8a8a7c80-314d-11e1-b685-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2506.57</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1190</tvd>
			<equipClass>hoisting equ -- heave compensator</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">93</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Suppose, for instance, that the descriptive power of the base component is, apparently, determined b</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="8a8aa38f-314d-11e1-ac39-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2443.47</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1165</tvd>
			<equipClass>drill floor -- tensioning syst</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">100</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Note that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="8a8aa390-314d-11e1-8caa-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3282.29</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3106.59</tvdInflow>
			<phase>snub</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">496.97</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">9.44</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3209.57</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.77</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.26</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3285.08</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.3</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">87.68</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">87.86</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>gas kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
			<formation>Summarizing, then, we assume that the th</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">130.74</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">86.04</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Note that relational information is not to be considered in determining the strong generative capacity of the theory.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="8a8af1b0-314d-11e1-b9a4-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3277.7</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3106.75</tvdInflow>
			<phase>coil</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- underream</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">499.8</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">6.07</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3283.8</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.1</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.46</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3262.52</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.13</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">89.61</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">82.56</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
			<formation>It appears that the systematic use of co</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">115.33</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">85.44</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Analogously, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not to be considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="8a8b18c0-314d-11e1-a9a6-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3299.75</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3171.04</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Suppose, for instance, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of fe</description>
		</stratInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="8a8b3fcf-314d-11e1-b0b1-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3229.99</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3167.42</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Of course, this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not quite equival</description>
		</stratInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="8a8b66e1-314d-11e1-bd29-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3357.82</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3379.92</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3207.37</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3247.05</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="8a8b66e2-314d-11e1-a245-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-03T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3363.04</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3387.96</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3291.35</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3291.59</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="8a8b66e3-314d-11e1-93ce-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1454</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1869.76</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1401.01</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1852.57</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">63</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">33</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">5</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">5</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">9</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">5</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">5</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="8a8b8df0-314d-11e1-af1e-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1455</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1842.03</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1497.41</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1899.44</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">61</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">35</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">7</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">7</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">6</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
	</drillReport><drillReport uidWell="8a8bb500-314d-11e1-bb6f-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="8a8bb501-314d-11e1-9f06-5490384b2405" uid="8a8bb502-314d-11e1-9393-5490384b2405">
		<nameWell>2/4-X-1</nameWell>
		<nameWellbore>2/4-X-1 B</nameWellbore>
		<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
		<dTimStart>2011-01-03T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
		<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
		<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
		<createDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
		<wellAlias uid="8a8bdc0f-314d-11e1-8fcc-5490384b2405">
			<name>2531-P</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellAlias>
		
		<wellboreAlias uid="8a8bdc10-314d-11e1-ba83-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>2/4-X-1 B</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellboreAlias uid="8a8bdc11-314d-11e1-b832-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>5448</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="8a8bdc12-314d-11e1-8c98-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
			<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
			<code>KB</code>
			<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">Notice, incidentally</datumName>
			
			<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
			<kind>ssss</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">92.69</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">83.57</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="8a8c0321-314d-11e1-8ee2-5490384b2405">
				<wellCRS>To ch</wellCRS>
				<latitude uom="dega">6.25</latitude>
				<longitude uom="dega">1.65</longitude>
				<original>false</original>
				<description>By combining adjunct</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>On the other hand, t</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="false" uid="8a8c2a30-314d-11e1-b005-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
			<name>Sea Level</name>
			<code>SL</code>
			<datumName code="It" namingSystem="Fr">Suppo</datumName>
			<kind>It mu</kind>
			<kind>Summa</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>It ma</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-1</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">640</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">701</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
				<wellCRS>well crs 37</wellCRS>
				
				<projectedX uom="fm">56</projectedX>
				<projectedY uom="chSe">24</projectedY>
				<original>true</original>
				<description>We have already seen that the speaker-he</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>To characterize a linguistic level L, the earlier discussion of deviance does not readily tolerate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellCRS uid="8a8c9f5e-314d-11e1-9ee3-5490384b2405">
			<name>WGS84</name>
			<mapProjection>
				<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">With this clarificat</nameCRS>
				<projectionCode>equidistant conic</projectionCode>
				<projectedFrom>Of course,</projectedFrom>
				<stdParallel1 uom="dega">83.73</stdParallel1>
				<stdParallel2 uom="dega">77.97</stdParallel2>
				<centralMeridian uom="dega">68.75</centralMeridian>
				<originLatitude uom="dega">25.29</originLatitude>
				<originLongitude uom="dega">38.31</originLongitude>
				<latitude1 uom="dega">26.97</latitude1>
				<longitude1 uom="dega">53.42</longitude1>
				<latitude2 uom="dega">90.2</latitude2>
				<longitude2 uom="dega">77.53</longitude2>
				<latitudeForScale uom="dega">94.26</latitudeForScale>
				<longitudeForScale uom="dega">88.87</longitudeForScale>
				<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">16.87</trueScaleLatitude>
				<spheroidRadius uom="m">284</spheroidRadius>
				<scaleFactor>693</scaleFactor>
				<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
				<perspectiveHeight uom="m">956</perspectiveHeight>
				<zone>2N</zone>
				<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
				<falseEasting uom="m">310</falseEasting>
				<falseNorthing uom="m">117</falseNorthing>
				<bearing uom="dega">85.87</bearing>
				<hemisphere>northern</hemisphere>
				<description>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the theory of syntactic features developed earli</description>
				<parameter index="5" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">It appears that the </parameter>
				<parameter index="14" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Of course, the theor</parameter>
			</mapProjection>
			<description>Nevertheless, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is necessary to impose an i</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellCRS uid="8a8ced80-314d-11e1-a090-5490384b2405">
			<name>EU79</name>
			
			<geographic>
				<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
				<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
				<xTranslation uom="cm">54</xTranslation>
				<yTranslation uom="yd">720</yTranslation>
				<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">49</zTranslation>
				<xRotation uom="dega">55</xRotation>
				<yRotation uom="dega">60</yRotation>
				<zRotation uom="dega">68</zRotation>
				<scaleFactor>23</scaleFactor>
				<ellipsoidCode>HOUG</ellipsoidCode>
				<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">2</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
				<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>66.38</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
			</geographic>
			
			<description>It may be, then, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is unspecified with respect t</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellboreInfo>
			<dTimSpud>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
			<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
			<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-03</dateDrillComplete>
			<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
			<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
			<rigAlias uid="8a8d148f-314d-11e1-abe7-5490384b2405">
				<name>EKOFISK X</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
			<rigAlias uid="8a8d1490-314d-11e1-b6d4-5490384b2405">
				<name>278525</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
		</wellboreInfo>
		<statusInfo uid="8a8d3b9e-314d-11e1-befb-5490384b2405">
 			<reportNo>1</reportNo>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3574.66</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3368.57</tvd>
			<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1249</mdPlugTop>
			<diaHole uom="in">14.0</diaHole>
			<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1444.79</mdDiaHoleStart>
			<diaPilot uom="in">15.48</diaPilot>
			<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1055</mdDiaPilotPlan>
			<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1088</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
			<typeWellbore>reentry</typeWellbore>
			<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1638.04</mdKickoff>
			<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1707.77</tvdKickoff>
			<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1025</strengthForm>
			<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1058</mdStrengthForm>
			<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1010</tvdStrengthForm>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">2</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3148.08</mdCsgLast>
			<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3349.4</tvdCsgLast>
			<presTestType>formation integrity test</presTestType>
			<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
			<distDrill uom="m">27.15</distDrill>
			<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">52.76</elevKelly>
 			<waterDepth uom="m">1088</waterDepth> 
			<sum24Hr>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: most of the methodological work in modern linguistics suffices to account for an important distinction in language use.</sum24Hr>
			<forecast24Hr>Thus this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not subject to the levels of acce</forecast24Hr>
			<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1016</ropCurrent>
 			<tightWell>true</tightWell> 
			<hpht>true</hpht>
			<avgPresBH uom="psig">1037</avgPresBH>
			<avgTempBH uom="degC">1078</avgTempBH>
			<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
		</statusInfo>
		<bitRecord uid="8a8d89c0-314d-11e1-83bd-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>1</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">5.15</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer It may be, then, tha</manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-24</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>Thus a subset of English sente</dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">13.76</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1109</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1568</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">10.53</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1420</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">15.8</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.71</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1453</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">152</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">10.56</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<bitRecord uid="8a8db0cf-314d-11e1-8d5f-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>3</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">5.7</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer On the other hand, t</manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-20</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>On the other hand, most of the</dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">11.89</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1172</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1588</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">13.69</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1375</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">16.79</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">12.59</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1286</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">143</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">15.33</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>t</type>
			<id uom="in">11.88</id>
			<od uom="in">17.69</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">137</weight>
			<grade>Let us continue to s</grade>
			<connection>Conversely, the natu</connection>
			<length uom="m">1099</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1011</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1074</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
				<description>Clearly, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction </description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>l</type>
			<id uom="in">12.55</id>
			<od uom="in">14.19</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">115</weight>
			<grade>Clearly, the appeara</grade>
			<connection>Comparing these exam</connection>
			<length uom="m">1025</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1092</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1026</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
				<description>Suppose, for instance, that the notion of level of grammaticalness is not quite equivalent to a para</description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>unknown</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">11.47</casingStrDia>
			<comments>On our assumptions, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is to be regarded as the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1096</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1030</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.13</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1004</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1017</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.75</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>For one thing, any associated supporting element is not subject to an abstract underlying order.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>On our assumptions, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition suffices to account for the traditiona</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1194</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">1.04</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1060</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1032</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.36</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), this selectionally introduced contextual feature is necessary to impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>false</topPlug>
			<botPlug>false</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1184</presBump>
			<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
			<rotated>true</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>unknown</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">11.44</casingStrDia>
			<comments>Note that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not to be considered in determining a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been
defined by the paired utterance test.</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1071</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>It may be, then, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort does not readily tolerate th</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1015</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.88</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1009</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1042</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.1</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the descriptive power of the base component raises serious doubts about the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual
gibberish (e.g. (98d)).</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Analogously, any associated supporting element delimits a general convention regarding the forms of </descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1071</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">1.13</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1125</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1180</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.55</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>Let us continue to suppose that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is necessary to impose an interpretation on an abstract underlying order.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>false</topPlug>
			<botPlug>false</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1121</presBump>
			<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
			<rotated>false</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<fluid uid="8a8f1061-314d-11e1-9f21-5490384b2405">
			<type>Mud Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3456.62</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3162.99</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">630.02</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.59</density>
			<pv uom="mPa.s">0.48</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">7.95</yp>
		</fluid>
		<fluid uid="8a8f3770-314d-11e1-81ca-5490384b2405">
			<type>Oil Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3463.3</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3334.11</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">657.67</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.45</density>
			<pv uom="mPa.s">0.68</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">8.98</yp>
		</fluid>
		<porePressure uid="8a8f3771-314d-11e1-bee0-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.46</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3135.04</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3070.12</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<porePressure uid="8a8f5e80-314d-11e1-ba8a-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.96</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3126.86</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3174.7</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z">To characterize a li Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3160.35</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3130.02</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.32</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">74.35</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3134.99</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3121.31</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.6</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">74.96</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3165.92</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3008.99</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.24</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">70.31</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3195.0</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3183.11</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.65</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">76.37</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3153.43</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3178.56</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.95</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">76.99</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3149.91</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3192.4</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.32</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">75.36</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<activity uid="8a8fac9e-314d-11e1-84b3-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3127.05</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>bop test</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a8fac9f-314d-11e1-aaaa-5490384b2405">3064.76</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Conversely, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is necessary to i</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a8fd3ae-314d-11e1-9614-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3174.71</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a8fd3af-314d-11e1-b103-5490384b2405">3134.45</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft This suggests that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is, apparently, determined </comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a8ffac0-314d-11e1-9633-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3003.67</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>bop test</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a8ffac1-314d-11e1-a245-5490384b2405">3185.93</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Nevertheless, the notion of level of grammaticalness may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a9021cf-314d-11e1-8795-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3080.5</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>coil</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a9021d0-314d-11e1-89bf-5490384b2405">3021.0</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Suppose, for instance, that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds i</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="8a9048de-314d-11e1-8658-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3052.81</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>bop test</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="8a9048df-314d-11e1-97a7-5490384b2405">3163.32</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Presumably, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is, apparently, dete</comments>
		</activity>
		<logInfo uid="8a9048e0-314d-11e1-9093-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>1</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2438.46</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2266.84</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1139</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1168</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Gamma</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">116.58</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">10.22</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4060.38</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1143</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="8a906ff0-314d-11e1-af7d-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>3</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2334.78</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2100.59</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1128</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1144</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Electrical</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">100.73</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">14.12</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4097.1</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1143</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="8a909700-314d-11e1-9151-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>3</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2304.34</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2418.98</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1150</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1166</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Electrical</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">101.56</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">14.99</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4344.84</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1185</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a909701-314d-11e1-8cab-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1562</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1776.26</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1427.52</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1768.91</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">269.14</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">95.88</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">219</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Clearly, most of the methodological work</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a90be0f-314d-11e1-9405-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1563</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1541.85</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1424.61</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1783.93</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">268.58</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">97.64</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">226</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH On our assumptions, the earlier discussi</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="8a90e521-314d-11e1-848a-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1570</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1523.38</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1423.26</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1726.74</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">286.6</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">93.15</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">208</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Analogously, a subset of English sentenc</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="8a910c30-314d-11e1-8cdc-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>drill stem test</testType>
			<testNumber>2</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1889.06</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1712.92</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1885.38</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1856.75</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">300.12</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.44</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.51</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.46</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.42</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.72</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">129.32</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">35.31</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">36.49</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">21</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">4</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.22</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.84</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.86</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">37.39</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="8a913340-314d-11e1-8641-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>drill stem test</testType>
			<testNumber>2</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1752.23</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1846.24</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1729.54</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1743.43</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">323.08</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.31</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.75</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.53</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.82</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.42</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">120.31</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">36.34</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">35.26</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">22</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.6</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.93</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.57</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">36.33</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="8a915a4f-314d-11e1-929d-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1530</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1461.23</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">15.4</presPore>
			<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1511</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.92</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">4900.39</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Suppose, for instance, that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is not quite equivalent to the</description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="8a918161-314d-11e1-8677-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1527</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1486.28</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">19.85</presPore>
			<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1519</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.69</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">14235.46</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH It must be emphasized, once again, that the descriptive power of the base component is, apparently, </description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="8a91a870-314d-11e1-aecb-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1545</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1987.8</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1494.56</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1892.38</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows It must be emphasized, once again, that a descriptively adequate grammar delimits the system of base</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology It must be emphasized, once again, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature delimits th</lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="8a91cf80-314d-11e1-b437-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1533</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1965.08</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1466.55</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1882.25</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows Clearly, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier raises serious doubts about a stipulatio</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology However, this assumption is not correct, since the theory of syntactic features developed earlier ca</lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="8a91cf81-314d-11e1-86fd-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2525.87</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1179</tvd>
			<equipClass>drill floor -- draw works</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">93</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Thus the systematic use of complex symbols is not to be considered in determining irrelevant interve</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="8a91f691-314d-11e1-9ea5-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2434.44</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1167</tvd>
			<equipClass>drill floor -- other</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">60</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Of course, an important property of these three types of EC is rather different from nondistinctness</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="8a921da1-314d-11e1-973b-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3293.88</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3103.75</tvdInflow>
			<phase>fixed</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">468.13</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">6.56</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3210.5</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.08</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.35</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">6</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3286.9</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.38</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">85.54</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">81.6</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>wait and weight</killingType>
			<formation>With this clarification, the earlier dis</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">123.69</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">88.77</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" It must be emphasized, once again, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is to be regarded as an important distinction in language use.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="8a926bc0-314d-11e1-bd88-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3284.24</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3017.46</tvdInflow>
			<phase>fixed</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">440.02</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">6.77</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3286.66</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.17</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.35</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">9</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3234.25</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.14</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">87.64</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">82.79</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
			<formation>Note that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguisti</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">130.15</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">88.41</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Notice, incidentally, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature cannot be arbitrary in the traditional practice of grammarians.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="8a9292cf-314d-11e1-ac67-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3282.75</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3146.93</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test This suggests that a descriptively adequate grammar is not subject to the ultima</description>
		</stratInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="8a92b9de-314d-11e1-951e-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3200.74</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3104.96</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the earlier discussion </description>
		</stratInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="8a92b9df-314d-11e1-b137-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3335.12</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3366.96</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3215.64</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3265.7</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="8a92e0ee-314d-11e1-968e-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-03T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3372.99</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3360.96</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3284.21</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3269.1</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="8a92e0ef-314d-11e1-8359-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1484</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1862.01</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1453.96</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1826.72</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">73</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">38</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">5</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">7</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">7</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">6</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="8a930800-314d-11e1-be1c-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1418</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1863.51</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1404.77</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1832.02</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">60</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">34</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">8</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">7</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">6</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
	</drillReport>
</drillReports>