DPR sample injection test data.xml
35.7 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<WITSMLComposite xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/131/addendum/combo" version="1.3.1.10" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/131/addendum/combo H:\EPIM\DPRSCHEMA\WITSML_v131_addendum_combo\WITSML_Composite.xsd">
<documentInfo>
<DocumentName namingSystem="EC">TRYM August 2011</DocumentName>
<DocumentAlias namingSystem="EC">TRYM DPR Report</DocumentAlias>
<DocumentDate>2011-08-31T00:00:00.0Z</DocumentDate>
<FileCreationInformation>
<FileCreationDate>2011-08-31T00:00:00.0Z</FileCreationDate>
<SoftwareName>Energy Components</SoftwareName>
<FileCreator>Energy Components</FileCreator>
</FileCreationInformation>
<SecurityInformation>
<Class>Partner confidential</Class>
<System>TRYM</System>
</SecurityInformation>
<AuditTrail>
<Event>
<EventDate>2011-08-31T00:00:00.0Z</EventDate>
<ResponsibleParty>Operator</ResponsibleParty>
<Comment>Release of DPR report</Comment>
</Event>
</AuditTrail>
</documentInfo>
<wellSet>
<well uid="x">
<name>3/7-A-1 AH</name>
<wellboreSet>
<wellbore>
<name>3/7-A-1 AH</name>
<wellTestSet>
<wellTest>
<name>3/7-A-1 AH</name>
<testDate>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</testDate>
<previousTestDate>2011-08-20T00:00:00.0Z</previousTestDate>
<lastValidTest>2011-08-15T00:00:00.0Z</lastValidTest>
<testReason>periodic</testReason>
<testType>combined test</testType>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">26.04</chokeOrificeSize>
<productionTest>
<testDuration uom="h">4.0</testDuration>
<bottomholeData>
<bottomholePres uom="bar">289.13</bottomholePres>
<bottomholeTemp uom="degC">93.93</bottomholeTemp>
</bottomholeData>
<separatorData>
<separatorPressure uom="bar">32.39</separatorPressure>
<separatorTemperature uom="degC">29.78</separatorTemperature>
</separatorData>
<operatingMethod>pumping</operatingMethod>
<productionTestResults>
<oilVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">1924.14</volumeStdTempPres>
<volume uom="m3">1668.08</volume>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">719.63</densityStdTempPres>
</oilVolume>
<oilRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/h">728.23</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/h">757.36</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</oilRate>
<gasVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">1888.16</volumeStdTempPres>
<volume uom="m3">1407.35</volume>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">735.29</densityStdTempPres>
</gasVolume>
<gasRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/h">788.01</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/h">700.57</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</gasRate>
<waterVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">156.83</volumeStdTempPres>
<volume uom="m3">195.49</volume>
</waterVolume>
<waterRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/h">35.39</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/h">76.14</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</waterRate>
<gasOilRatio uom="%">14.48</gasOilRatio>
<basicSedimentAndWater uom="%">2.94</basicSedimentAndWater>
<oilPotential uom="1000m3/d">0.63</oilPotential>
<gasPotential uom="1000m3/d">418.66</gasPotential>
<sandVolume uom="m3">0.63</sandVolume>
</productionTestResults>
</productionTest>
</wellTest>
<wellTest>
<name>3/7-A-1 AH</name>
<testDate>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</testDate>
<previousTestDate>2011-08-20T00:00:00.0Z</previousTestDate>
<lastValidTest>2011-08-15T00:00:00.0Z</lastValidTest>
<testReason>periodic</testReason>
<testType>combined test</testType>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">26.04</chokeOrificeSize>
<injectionTest>
<testDuration uom="h">2.0</testDuration>
<testInterval>
<mdTop uom="m" datum="datum9">2866.63</mdTop>
<mdBase uom="m" datum="datum11">2198.48</mdBase>
<testedFormation>Formation 1</testedFormation>
</testInterval>
<InjectedFluid>gas</InjectedFluid>
<wellTestCumulative>
<cumulativeOil uom="m3">2450.32</cumulativeOil>
<cumulativeGas uom="m3">25947.98</cumulativeGas>
<cumulativeWater uom="m3">118.24</cumulativeWater>
</wellTestCumulative>
<minimumAnnularPressure uom="Pa">84.32</minimumAnnularPressure>
<maximumAnnularPressure uom="Pa">36.06</maximumAnnularPressure>
<wellheadFlowingPressure uom="Pa">49.73</wellheadFlowingPressure>
<wellheadMaximumPressure uom="Pa">29.09</wellheadMaximumPressure>
<injectionTestResults>
<oilVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">2706.1</volumeStdTempPres>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">741.28</densityStdTempPres>
</oilVolume>
<oilRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/s">2737.53</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</oilRate>
<gasVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">2601.75</volumeStdTempPres>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">728.62</densityStdTempPres>
</gasVolume>
<gasRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/s">2879.71</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/s">2082.3</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</gasRate>
<waterVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">139.9</volumeStdTempPres>
</waterVolume>
<waterRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/s">168.73</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/s">106.85</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</waterRate>
</injectionTestResults>
</injectionTest>
</wellTest>
</wellTestSet>
</wellbore>
</wellboreSet>
</well>
<well uid="x">
<name>3/7-A-2 H</name>
<wellboreSet>
<wellbore>
<name>3/7-A-2 H</name>
<wellTestSet>
<wellTest>
<name>3/7-A-2 H</name>
<testDate>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</testDate>
<previousTestDate>2011-08-20T00:00:00.0Z</previousTestDate>
<lastValidTest>2011-08-15T00:00:00.0Z</lastValidTest>
<testReason>periodic</testReason>
<testType>combined test</testType>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">45.61</chokeOrificeSize>
<productionTest>
<testDuration uom="h">2.0</testDuration>
<bottomholeData>
<bottomholePres uom="bar">268.12</bottomholePres>
<bottomholeTemp uom="degC">99.8</bottomholeTemp>
</bottomholeData>
<separatorData>
<separatorPressure uom="bar">12.34</separatorPressure>
<separatorTemperature uom="degC">36.81</separatorTemperature>
</separatorData>
<operatingMethod>pumping</operatingMethod>
<productionTestResults>
<oilVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">1935.91</volumeStdTempPres>
<volume uom="m3">1823.78</volume>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">712.13</densityStdTempPres>
</oilVolume>
<oilRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/h">710.77</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/h">761.28</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</oilRate>
<gasVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">1638.65</volumeStdTempPres>
<volume uom="m3">1714.85</volume>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">715.14</densityStdTempPres>
</gasVolume>
<gasRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/h">781.74</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/h">710.88</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</gasRate>
<waterVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">197.01</volumeStdTempPres>
<volume uom="m3">150.01</volume>
</waterVolume>
<waterRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/h">20.51</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/h">76.17</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</waterRate>
<gasOilRatio uom="%">0.33</gasOilRatio>
<basicSedimentAndWater uom="%">2.7</basicSedimentAndWater>
<oilPotential uom="1000m3/d">36.02</oilPotential>
<gasPotential uom="1000m3/d">256.8</gasPotential>
<sandVolume uom="m3">0.82</sandVolume>
</productionTestResults>
</productionTest>
</wellTest>
<wellTest>
<name>3/7-A-2 H injection test</name>
<injectionTest>
<testDuration uom="h">1.0</testDuration>
<testInterval>
<mdTop uom="m" datum="datum9">2317.91</mdTop>
<mdBase uom="m" datum="datum11">2870.08</mdBase>
<testedFormation>Formation 1</testedFormation>
</testInterval>
<InjectedFluid>gas</InjectedFluid>
<wellTestCumulative>
<cumulativeOil uom="m3">2095.16</cumulativeOil>
<cumulativeGas uom="m3">27144.07</cumulativeGas>
<cumulativeWater uom="m3">220.96</cumulativeWater>
</wellTestCumulative>
<minimumAnnularPressure uom="Pa">28.04</minimumAnnularPressure>
<maximumAnnularPressure uom="Pa">74.01</maximumAnnularPressure>
<wellheadFlowingPressure uom="Pa">58.73</wellheadFlowingPressure>
<wellheadMaximumPressure uom="Pa">26.95</wellheadMaximumPressure>
<injectionTestResults>
<oilVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">2175.67</volumeStdTempPres>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">715.15</densityStdTempPres>
</oilVolume>
<oilRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/s">2111.85</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</oilRate>
<gasVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">2200.65</volumeStdTempPres>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">713.78</densityStdTempPres>
</gasVolume>
<gasRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/s">2873.09</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/s">2372.88</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</gasRate>
<waterVolume>
<volumeStdTempPres uom="m3">271.71</volumeStdTempPres>
</waterVolume>
<waterRate>
<fluidRate uom="m3/s">131.24</fluidRate>
<fluidRateStdTempPres uom="m3/s">101.35</fluidRateStdTempPres>
</waterRate>
</injectionTestResults>
</injectionTest>
</wellTest>
</wellTestSet>
</wellbore>
</wellboreSet>
</well>
</wellSet>
<productionOperationSet>
<productionOperation>
<name>TRYM operation report</name>
<installation namingSystem="DONG" kind="field">TRYM</installation>
<periodKind>day</periodKind>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<operator>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<role>Operator</role>
<personName>
<prefix>Mr</prefix>
<first>Test</first>
<last>Dong</last>
</personName>
<address>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<street>Rosenberggate 99</street>
<city>Stavanger</city>
<country>Norway</country>
<postalCode>4002</postalCode>
</address>
</operator>
<title>TRYM operation report</title>
<geographicContext>
<country>Norway</country>
<field namingSystem="DONG">TRYM</field>
<offshoreLocation>
<blockID>3/7</blockID>
<northSeaOffshore>
<areaName>String</areaName>
<quadrant>3</quadrant>
<blockSuffix>7</blockSuffix>
</northSeaOffshore>
</offshoreLocation>
</geographicContext>
<issueDate>2011-08-31</issueDate>
<issuedBy>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<role>Operator</role>
<personName>
<prefix>Mr</prefix>
<first>Test</first>
<last>Dong</last>
</personName>
</issuedBy>
<approvalDate>2011-08-31</approvalDate>
<approver>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<role>Platformssjef</role>
<personName>
<prefix>Mr</prefix>
<first>Test</first>
<last>Dong</last>
</personName>
</approver>
<installationReport uid="x">
<installation namingSystem="DONG" kind="field">TRYM</installation>
<bedsAvailable>10</bedsAvailable>
<crewCount type="catering crew">1</crewCount>
<crewCount type="contractor crew">4</crewCount>
<crewCount type="own crew">5</crewCount>
<work uom="h">23.0</work>
<workMonthToDate uom="d">15.0</workMonthToDate>
<workYearToDate uom="d">55.0</workYearToDate>
<operationalHSE>
<IncidentCount>1</IncidentCount>
<sinceLostTime uom="d">10</sinceLostTime>
<sincePreventionExercise uom="d">16.0</sincePreventionExercise>
<sinceDefinedSituation uom="d">1.0</sinceDefinedSituation>
<alarmCount>0</alarmCount>
<safetyIntroCount>0</safetyIntroCount>
<safetyDescription>To provide a constituent
structure for T(Z,K), the
theory of syntactic features
developed earlier is not to be
considered in determining the
strong generative capacity of
the theory.</safetyDescription>
<safety>
<meantimeIncident uom="d">2.0</meantimeIncident>
<safetyCount type="lost time incident" period="day">1</safetyCount>
<safetyCount type="sick on board" period="day">1</safetyCount>
<comment>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: an important property of these three types
of EC is to be regarded as a parasitic gap construction.</comment>
</comment>
</safety>
<weather>
<dTim>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<agency>Weather agency</agency>
<barometricPressure uom="Pa">59.0</barometricPressure>
<beaufortScaleNumber>12</beaufortScaleNumber>
<tempSurfaceMn uom="degC">11.0</tempSurfaceMn>
<tempSurfaceMx uom="degC">11.0</tempSurfaceMx>
<tempWindChill uom="degC">16.0</tempWindChill>
<tempsea uom="degC">17.0</tempsea>
<visibility uom="m">505.0</visibility>
<aziWave uom="rad">3.0</aziWave>
<htWave uom="m">3.0</htWave>
<significantWave uom="m">3.0</significantWave>
<maxWave uom="m">6.0</maxWave>
<periodWave uom="s">6.0</periodWave>
<aziWind uom="rad">5.0</aziWind>
<velWind uom="m/s">8.0</velWind>
<typePrecip>rain</typePrecip>
<amtPrecip uom="m">7.0</amtPrecip>
<coverCloud>153.0</coverCloud>
<ceilingCloud uom="m">382.0</ceilingCloud>
<currentSea uom="m/s">4.0</currentSea>
<aziCurrentSea uom="rad">3.0</aziCurrentSea>
<comments>It appears that a descriptively adequate grammar is necessary to impose an interpretation on an
important distinction in language use.</comments>
</weather>
</operationalHSE>
<productionActivity>
<lostProduction>
<volumeAndReason reasonLost="topside equipment failure-maint" uom="m3">1832.9</volumeAndReason>
<volumeAndReason reasonLost="well preventive maint" uom="m3">1028.62</volumeAndReason>
<thirdPartyProcessing>
<installation kind="platform">Ekofisk</installation>
<oilStdTempPres uom="m3">1726.01</oilStdTempPres>
<gasStdTempPres uom="m3">1850.42</gasStdTempPres>
</thirdPartyProcessing>
</lostProduction>
<waterCleaningQuality>
<samplePoint>Sample 1</samplePoint>
<oilInWaterProduced uom="Euc">87.8</oilInWaterProduced>
<amountOfOil uom="kg">45.45</amountOfOil>
<ammonium uom="kg/m3">8.03</ammonium>
<totalOrganicCarbon uom="Euc">78.62</totalOrganicCarbon>
<phenol uom="kg/m3">56.37</phenol>
<glycol uom="kg/m3">182.87</glycol>
<phValue>6.15</phValue>
<waterTemperature uom="degC">15.41</waterTemperature>
<residualChloride uom="Euc">52.52</residualChloride>
<oxygen uom="Euc">93.36</oxygen>
<turbidity>115.95</turbidity>
<coulterCounter uom="Euc">188.31</coulterCounter>
<comment>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>With this clarification, the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be
arbitrary in problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</comment>
</comment>
</waterCleaningQuality>
<shutdown>
<installation kind="well">String</installation>
<description>Preventive maintenance</description>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<volumetricDownTime uom="h">22.0</volumetricDownTime>
<lossOilStdTempPres uom="m3">729.88</lossOilStdTempPres>
<lossGasStdTempPres uom="m3">8783.52</lossGasStdTempPres>
<activity>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>Suppose, for instance, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is
not to be considered in determining the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comment>
</activity>
</shutdown>
<alarm>
<dTim>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<area>Area A</area>
<type>Gas Alarm</type>
<reason>Faulty alarm</reason>
<comment>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is
rather different from a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the
paired utterance test.</comment>
</alarm>
<marineOperation>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<generalComment>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the systematic use of complex
symbols delimits the strong generative capacity of the theory.</generalComment>
<supplyShip>Supply 1</supplyShip>
<standbyVessel>Standby 1</standbyVessel>
<supplyShipComment>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>We have already seen that the notion of level of grammaticalness suffices to account for a
stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</comment>
</supplyShipComment>
<supplyShipComment>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>With this clarification, the systematic use of complex symbols can be defined in such a way as to
impose a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.</comment>
</supplyShipComment>
<standbyVesselComment>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>However, this assumption is not correct, since the earlier discussion of deviance is not quite
equivalent to the traditional practice of grammarians.</comment>
</standbyVesselComment>
<basketMovement>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>It may be, then, that the systematic use of complex symbols delimits the requirement that branching
is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.</comment>
</basketMovement>
<basketMovement>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>With this clarification, the earlier discussion of deviance is not to be considered in determining
the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comment>
</basketMovement>
<activity>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>So far, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction
is unspecified with respect to the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comment>
</activity>
<activity>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>Of course, this selectionally introduced contextual feature may remedy and, at the same time,
eliminate nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.</comment>
</activity>
</marineOperation>
<cargoShipOperation>
<vesselName>Cargo 1</vesselName>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<captain>Captain 1</captain>
<cargo>Oil</cargo>
<oilGrossStdTempPres uom="m3">7597.6</oilGrossStdTempPres>
<oilGrossTotalStdTempPres uom="m3">9826.62</oilGrossTotalStdTempPres>
<oilNetStdTempPres uom="m3">5835.17</oilNetStdTempPres>
<oilNetMonthToDateStdTempPres uom="m3">6383.72</oilNetMonthToDateStdTempPres>
<densityStdTempPres uom="kg/m3">716.91</densityStdTempPres>
<rvp uom="Pa">176.52</rvp>
<bsw uom="Euc">199.42</bsw>
<salt uom="kg/m3">120.48</salt>
<comment>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>On our assumptions, any associated supporting element is not to be considered in determining an
important distinction in language use.</comment>
</comment>
<comment>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>Suppose, for instance, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is,
apparently, determined by problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</comment>
</comment>
</cargoShipOperation>
<operationalComment>
<type>production</type>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>It may be, then, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not affect the
structure of a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.</comment>
</operationalComment>
<operationalComment>
<type>production</type>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>Furthermore, relational information may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate nondistinctness in
the sense of distinctive feature theory.</comment>
</operationalComment>
</productionActivity>
</installationReport>
</productionOperation>
</productionOperationSet>
<productVolumeSet>
<productVolume>
<name>TRYM volumes</name>
<installation namingSystem="DONG" kind="field">TRYM</installation>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<operator>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<role>Operator</role>
<personName>
<prefix>Mr</prefix>
<first>Test</first>
<last>Dong</last>
</personName>
<address>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<street>Rosenberggate 99</street>
<city>Stavanger</city>
<country>Norway</country>
<postalCode>4002</postalCode>
</address>
</operator>
<title>TRYM operation report</title>
<geographicContext>
<country>Norway</country>
<field namingSystem="DONG">TRYM</field>
<offshoreLocation>
<blockID>3/7</blockID>
<northSeaOffshore>
<areaName>String</areaName>
<quadrant>3</quadrant>
<blockSuffix>7</blockSuffix>
</northSeaOffshore>
</offshoreLocation>
</geographicContext>
<issueDate>2011-08-31</issueDate>
<issuedBy>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<role>Operator</role>
<personName>
<prefix>Mr</prefix>
<first>Test</first>
<last>Dong</last>
</personName>
</issuedBy>
<approvalDate>2011-08-31</approvalDate>
<approver>
<name>DONG E&P Norge AS</name>
<role>Platformssjef</role>
<personName>
<prefix>Mr</prefix>
<first>Test</first>
<last>Dong</last>
</personName>
</approver>
<standardTempPres>0 degC 1 atm</standardTempPres>
<facility uid="x">
<name kind="field" namingSystem="NPD" uidRef="18081500">TRYM</name>
<unit uidRef="x">String</unit>
<network uidRef="x">String</network>
<downtimeReason uid="4b7732e1-fedf-11e0-9818-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Test</who>
<role>Platform chied</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T03:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>It appears that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does not affect the structure of the
ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</comment>
</downtimeReason>
<downtimeReason uid="4b7732e2-fedf-11e0-bd8a-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Test</who>
<role>Platform chied</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>Presumably, the descriptive power of the base component is not subject to a descriptive fact.</comment>
</downtimeReason>
<flow uid="4b7759f0-fedf-11e0-8ff5-5490384b2405">
<name>TRYM field production</name>
<kind>production</kind>
<port uidRef="4b7759f1-fedf-11e0-8bfa-5490384b2405">String</port>
<qualifier>allocated</qualifier>
<gor uom="Euc">197.34</gor>
<gorMTD uom="Euc">159.2</gorMTD>
<waterConcMass uom="Euc">192.72</waterConcMass>
<waterConcVol uom="Euc">132.4</waterConcVol>
<atmosphere uom="Pa">122.2</atmosphere>
<temp uom="degC">172.96</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">162.31</pres>
<absoluteMinPres uom="Pa">103.94</absoluteMinPres>
<portDiff uid="4b7759f2-fedf-11e0-ab15-5490384b2405">
<port uidRef="4b7759f3-fedf-11e0-9ca3-5490384b2405">Test port</port>
<presDiff uom="Pa">161.0</presDiff>
<tempDiff uom="K">180.03</tempDiff>
<chokeSize uom="mm">159.83</chokeSize>
<chokeRelative uom="%">61.08</chokeRelative>
</portDiff>
<product uid="4b778100-fedf-11e0-96c2-5490384b2405">
<kind>oil - net</kind>
<name>oil - net dedicated at naming chemicals</name>
<splitFactor>0.5</splitFactor>
<rvp uom="Pa">102.65</rvp>
<tvp uom="Pa">303.6</tvp>
<bsw uom="Euc">261.93</bsw>
<bswPrevious uom="Euc">237.47</bswPrevious>
<density uom="kg/m3">203.13</density>
<densityStd uom="kg/m3">345.91</densityStd>
<sg uom="Euc">279.87</sg>
<hcDewpoint uom="K">320.78</hcDewpoint>
<waterDewpoint uom="K">316.83</waterDewpoint>
<wobbeIndex uom="J/m3">357.16</wobbeIndex>
<grossCalorificValueStd uom="J/m3">146.13</grossCalorificValueStd>
<rvpStabilizedCrude uom="Pa">138.97</rvpStabilizedCrude>
<bswStabilizedCrude uom="Euc">498.79</bswStabilizedCrude>
<densityStabilizedCrude uom="kg/m3">413.93</densityStabilizedCrude>
<!--component content typically used for denoting components as part of a product stream e.g. gas containing products breakdowns-->
<componentContent uid="4b778101-fedf-11e0-b7c3-5490384b2405">
<kind>water</kind>
<density uom="kg/m3">429.24</density>
<densityStd uom="kg/m3">189.02</densityStd>
<concentration uom="Euc">292.45</concentration>
</componentContent>
<componentContent uid="4b778102-fedf-11e0-b4b5-5490384b2405">
<kind>water</kind>
<density uom="kg/m3">447.85</density>
<densityStd uom="kg/m3">284.68</densityStd>
<concentration uom="Euc">102.1</concentration>
</componentContent>
<period uid="4b77a811-fedf-11e0-bd32-5490384b2405">
<kind>day</kind>
<volume uom="m3">3276.35</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">4428.25</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">205.31</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">273.85</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">253.99</pres>
<mass uom="kg">412.85</mass>
<work uom="J">421.92</work>
<comment uid="4b77a812-fedf-11e0-b7bd-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>Analogously, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is to be regarded as the traditional
practice of grammarians.</comment>
</comment>
<comment uid="4b77cf21-fedf-11e0-984c-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the earlier
discussion of deviance is necessary to impose an interpretation on a stipulation to place the
constructions into these various categories.</comment>
</comment>
</period>
<period uid="4b77cf22-fedf-11e0-aadd-5490384b2405">
<kind>month to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">1214.51</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">3787.32</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">394.85</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">495.75</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">250.41</pres>
<mass uom="kg">303.9</mass>
<work uom="J">442.63</work>
<comment uid="4b77cf23-fedf-11e0-a7c8-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>With this clarification, the descriptive power of the base component is unspecified with respect to
the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</comment>
</comment>
<comment uid="4b77f62e-fedf-11e0-a412-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>Furthermore, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not to be considered in
determining the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).</comment>
</comment>
</period>
<period uid="4b781d40-fedf-11e0-aa54-5490384b2405">
<kind>year to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">3207.66</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">3010.37</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">258.71</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">374.87</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">491.35</pres>
<mass uom="kg">434.78</mass>
<work uom="J">202.06</work>
<comment uid="4b781d41-fedf-11e0-b907-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, relational
information can be defined in such a way as to impose the system of base rules exclusive of the
lexicon.</comment>
</comment>
<comment uid="4b78444f-fedf-11e0-98e2-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>From C1, it follows that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not subject to the
strong generative capacity of the theory.</comment>
</comment>
</period>
</product>
<comment uid="4b786b5e-fedf-11e0-9233-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>On our assumptions, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is
unspecified with respect to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</comment>
</comment>
<comment uid="4b78926e-fedf-11e0-a86f-5490384b2405">
<who>Mr Producer</who>
<role>Platform chief</role>
<dTimStart>2011-08-30T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-08-30T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<comment>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that a descriptively adequate
grammar is not quite equivalent to the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comment>
</comment>
</flow>
<flow uid="4b7759f0-fedf-11e0-8ff5-5490384b2405">
<name>TRYM field injection</name>
<kind>injection</kind>
<qualifier>allocated</qualifier>
<product uid="4b778100-fedf-11e0-96c2-5490384b2405">
<kind>gas</kind>
<period uid="4b77a811-fedf-11e0-bd32-5490384b2405">
<kind>day</kind>
<volume uom="m3">3276.35</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">4428.25</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">205.31</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">273.85</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">253.99</pres>
</period>
<period uid="4b77cf22-fedf-11e0-aadd-5490384b2405">
<kind>month to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">1214.51</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">3787.32</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">394.85</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">495.75</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">250.41</pres>
</period>
<period uid="4b781d40-fedf-11e0-aa54-5490384b2405">
<kind>year to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">3207.66</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">3010.37</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">258.71</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">374.87</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">491.35</pres>
</period>
</product>
<product uid="4b778100-fedf-11e0-96c2-5490384b2405">
<kind>water</kind>
<period uid="4b77a811-fedf-11e0-bd32-5490384b2405">
<kind>day</kind>
<volume uom="m3">13276.35</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">14428.25</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">1205.31</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">1273.85</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">1253.99</pres>
</period>
<period uid="4b77cf22-fedf-11e0-aadd-5490384b2405">
<kind>month to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">2214.51</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">2787.32</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">294.85</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">295.75</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">150.41</pres>
</period>
<period uid="4b781d40-fedf-11e0-aa54-5490384b2405">
<kind>year to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">2207.66</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">2010.37</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">158.71</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">274.87</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">291.35</pres>
</period>
</product>
<product uid="4b778100-fedf-11e0-96c2-5490384b2405">
<kind>diesel</kind>
<period uid="4b77a811-fedf-11e0-bd32-5490384b2405">
<kind>day</kind>
<volume uom="m3">13276.35</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">14428.25</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">1205.31</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">1273.85</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">1253.99</pres>
</period>
<period uid="4b77cf22-fedf-11e0-aadd-5490384b2405">
<kind>month to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">2214.51</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">2787.32</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">294.85</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">295.75</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">150.41</pres>
</period>
<period uid="4b781d40-fedf-11e0-aa54-5490384b2405">
<kind>year to date</kind>
<volume uom="m3">2207.66</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">2010.37</volumeStd>
<flowRate uom="m3/s">158.71</flowRate>
<temp uom="K">274.87</temp>
<pres uom="Pa">291.35</pres>
</period>
</product>
<product uid="4b778100-fedf-11e0-96c2-5490384b2405">
<kind>cuttings</kind>
<period uid="4b77a811-fedf-11e0-bd32-5490384b2405">
<kind>day</kind>
<volume uom="cm3">118</volume>
<volumeStd uom="cm3">14428.25</volumeStd>
</period>
<period uid="4b77cf22-fedf-11e0-aadd-5490384b2405">
<kind>month to date</kind>
<volume uom="cm3">218</volume>
<volumeStd uom="cm3">12428.25</volumeStd>
</period>
<period uid="4b781d40-fedf-11e0-aa54-5490384b2405">
<kind>year to date</kind>
<volume uom="cm3">318</volume>
<volumeStd uom="cm3">34428.25</volumeStd>
</period>
</product>
<product uid="4b778100-fedf-11e0-96c2-5490384b2405">
<kind>chemical</kind>
<name>Wax inhibitor</name>
<period uid="4b77a811-fedf-11e0-bd32-5490384b2405">
<kind>day</kind>
<volume uom="L">18</volume>
<volumeStd uom="m3">14428.25</volumeStd>
</period>
<period uid="4b77cf22-fedf-11e0-aadd-5490384b2405">
<kind>month to date</kind>
<volume uom="L">30</volume>
</period>
<period uid="4b781d40-fedf-11e0-aa54-5490384b2405">
<kind>year to date</kind>
<volume uom="L">90</volume>
</period>
</product>
</flow>
</facility>
</productVolume>
</productVolumeSet>
</WITSMLComposite>