<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
		<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-01</documentName>
		<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-01</documentAlias>
		<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-01</documentAlias>
		<documentDate>2011-01-02T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
		<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
		<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
		<fileCreationInformation>
			<fileCreationDate>2011-01-02T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
			<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
			<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
			<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
		</fileCreationInformation>
		<securityInformation uid="715f44cf-314c-11e1-b168-5490384b2405">
			<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
			<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
			<endDate>2011-03-02T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
			<comment>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), an important property of these three types of EC can be defined in such a way as to impose a stipulation to place the constructions into these
various categories. This suggests that a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental</comment>
		</securityInformation>
		<securityInformation uid="715f6bde-314c-11e1-8028-5490384b2405">
			<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
			<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
			<endDate>2011-03-22T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
			<comment>Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respect to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex
</comment>
		</securityInformation>
		<disclaimer>Clearly, relational information is not subject to </disclaimer>
		<auditTrail>
			<event uid="715fba00-314c-11e1-9f4c-5490384b2405">
				<eventDate>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
				<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
				<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
				<comment>It must be emphasized, once again, that relational information can be defined in such a way as to impose the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.
Furthermore, the systematic use of complex symbols app</comment>
			</event>
			<event uid="715fe10f-314c-11e1-a1aa-5490384b2405">
				<eventDate>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
				<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
				<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
				<comment>On the other hand, a descriptively adequate grammar is rather different from nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Presumably, this selectionally introduced contextual feature
can be defined in such a way as to impose the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the d</comment>
			</event>
		</auditTrail>
		<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
		<comment>Daily Drilling Report To characterize a li</comment>
	</documentInfo>
	<drillReport uidWell="7160081e-314c-11e1-a38e-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="7160081f-314c-11e1-abf2-5490384b2405" uid="71602f30-314c-11e1-af54-5490384b2405">
		<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
		<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
		<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
		<dTimStart>2011-01-01T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
		<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
		<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
		<createDate>2011-01-02T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
		<wellAlias uid="71602f31-314c-11e1-8130-5490384b2405">
			<name>2531-P</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellAlias>
		
		<wellboreAlias uid="71602f32-314c-11e1-9b36-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellboreAlias uid="71602f33-314c-11e1-819b-5490384b2405"> 
			<name>5069</name>
			<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
		</wellboreAlias>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="71602f34-314c-11e1-8ad0-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
			<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
			<code>KB</code>
			<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">I suggested that the</datumName>
			
			<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
			<kind>ssss</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">77.62</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">61.6</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="71605640-314c-11e1-8310-5490384b2405">
				<wellCRS>Clear</wellCRS>
				<latitude uom="dega">18.9</latitude>
				<longitude uom="dega">7.55</longitude>
				<original>false</original>
				<description>If the position of t</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>Conversely, the appe</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="71607d4f-314c-11e1-9ba1-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
			<name>Sea Level</name>
			<code>SL</code>
			<datumName code="Th" namingSystem="Co">To pr</datumName>
			<kind>It mu</kind>
			<kind>On ou</kind>
			<wellbore>
				<wellboreReference>I sug</wellboreReference>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
			</wellbore>
			<rig>
				<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
				<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
				<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
			</rig>
			<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">801</elevation>
			<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">499</measuredDepth>
			<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
				<wellCRS>well crs 26</wellCRS>
				
				<projectedX uom="fm">14</projectedX>
				<projectedY uom="chSe">64</projectedY>
				<original>true</original>
				<description>With this clarification, a subset of Eng</description>
			</horizontalLocation>
			<comment>However, this assumption is not correct, since the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified with respect to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been
defined by the paired utterance test.</comment>
		</wellDatum>
		<wellCRS uid="7160f280-314c-11e1-a816-5490384b2405">
			<name>WGS84</name>
			<mapProjection>
				<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">To characterize a li</nameCRS>
				<projectionCode>Cassini</projectionCode>
				<projectedFrom>Neverthele</projectedFrom>
				<stdParallel1 uom="dega">96.34</stdParallel1>
				<stdParallel2 uom="dega">96.0</stdParallel2>
				<centralMeridian uom="dega">90.69</centralMeridian>
				<originLatitude uom="dega">81.18</originLatitude>
				<originLongitude uom="dega">29.8</originLongitude>
				<latitude1 uom="dega">38.0</latitude1>
				<longitude1 uom="dega">75.45</longitude1>
				<latitude2 uom="dega">92.26</latitude2>
				<longitude2 uom="dega">16.49</longitude2>
				<latitudeForScale uom="dega">67.23</latitudeForScale>
				<longitudeForScale uom="dega">10.52</longitudeForScale>
				<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">44.39</trueScaleLatitude>
				<spheroidRadius uom="m">604</spheroidRadius>
				<scaleFactor>511</scaleFactor>
				<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
				<perspectiveHeight uom="m">56</perspectiveHeight>
				<zone>5N</zone>
				<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
				<falseEasting uom="m">522</falseEasting>
				<falseNorthing uom="m">730</falseNorthing>
				<bearing uom="dega">59.58</bearing>
				<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
				<description>To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categ</description>
				<parameter index="1" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Nevertheless, the ap</parameter>
				<parameter index="8" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">So far, a case of se</parameter>
			</mapProjection>
			<description>Notice, incidentally, that the descriptive power of the base component is not quite equivalent to pr</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellCRS uid="716167b0-314c-11e1-9fa0-5490384b2405">
			<name>WGS84</name>
			
			<geographic>
				<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
				<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
				<xTranslation uom="cm">85</xTranslation>
				<yTranslation uom="yd">635</yTranslation>
				<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">5</zTranslation>
				<xRotation uom="dega">79</xRotation>
				<yRotation uom="dega">30</yRotation>
				<zRotation uom="dega">72</zRotation>
				<scaleFactor>36</scaleFactor>
				<ellipsoidCode>SA69</ellipsoidCode>
				<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">28</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
				<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>50.99</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
			</geographic>
			
			<description>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the n</description>
		</wellCRS>
		<wellboreInfo>
			<dTimSpud>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
			<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
			<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-01</dateDrillComplete>
			<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
			<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
			<rigAlias uid="7161b5cf-314c-11e1-aa16-5490384b2405">
				<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
			<rigAlias uid="7161b5d0-314c-11e1-8db5-5490384b2405">
				<name>278245</name>
				<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
			</rigAlias>
		</wellboreInfo>
		<statusInfo uid="7161b5d1-314c-11e1-a798-5490384b2405">
 			<reportNo>1</reportNo>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3809.25</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3034.15</tvd>
			<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1365</mdPlugTop>
			<diaHole uom="in">19.22</diaHole>
			<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1141.44</mdDiaHoleStart>
			<diaPilot uom="in">16.3</diaPilot>
			<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1167</mdDiaPilotPlan>
			<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1061</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
			<typeWellbore>reentry</typeWellbore>
			<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1511.58</mdKickoff>
			<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1919.87</tvdKickoff>
			<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1066</strengthForm>
			<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1146</mdStrengthForm>
			<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1159</tvdStrengthForm>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">8</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3583.8</mdCsgLast>
			<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3815.53</tvdCsgLast>
			<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
			<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
			<distDrill uom="m">10.82</distDrill>
			<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">58.68</elevKelly>
 			<waterDepth uom="m">1063</waterDepth> 
			<sum24Hr>Notice, incidentally, that any associated supporting element does not readily tolerate problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</sum24Hr>
			<forecast24Hr>Let us continue to suppose that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not a</forecast24Hr>
			<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1097</ropCurrent>
 			<tightWell>true</tightWell> 
			<hpht>true</hpht>
			<avgPresBH uom="psig">1048</avgPresBH>
			<avgTempBH uom="degC">1091</avgTempBH>
			<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
		</statusInfo>
		<bitRecord uid="716203ee-314c-11e1-a6f7-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>1</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">7.18</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer It must be emphasize</manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-29</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>We have already seen that this</dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">12.03</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1095</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1554</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">13.68</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1301</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">19.4</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.65</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1178</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">183</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">18.16</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<bitRecord uid="71622b00-314c-11e1-be42-5490384b2405">
			<numBit>1</numBit>
			<diaBit uom="in">6.86</diaBit>
			<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer It must be emphasize</manufacturer>
			<codeMfg>MX-26</codeMfg>
			<dullGrade>For any transformation which i</dullGrade>
			<bitRun>
				<eTimOpBit uom="h">16.61</eTimOpBit>
				<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1176</mdHoleStart>
				<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1543</mdHoleStop>
				<ropAv uom="m/h">14.86</ropAv>
				<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1287</mdHoleMadeRun>
				<hrsDrilled uom="h">19.87</hrsDrilled>
				<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">14.22</hrsDrilledRun>
				<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1183</mdTotHoleMade>
				<totHrsDrilled uom="h">124</totHrsDrilled>
				<totRop uom="m/h">17.04</totRop>
			</bitRun>
		</bitRecord>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>t</type>
			<id uom="in">17.58</id>
			<od uom="in">11.06</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">163</weight>
			<grade>To characterize a li</grade>
			<connection>However, this assump</connection>
			<length uom="m">1009</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1068</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1058</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Top</casingType>
				<description>To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categ</description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<casing_liner_tubing>
			<type>l</type>
			<id uom="in">15.48</id>
			<od uom="in">11.16</od>
			<weight uom="lbm/ft">114</weight>
			<grade>To provide a constit</grade>
			<connection>A consequence of the</connection>
			<length uom="m">1069</length>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1030</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1068</mdBottom>
			<casing_liner_tubing_run>
				<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
				<description>On our assumptions, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds appears t</description>
				<dTimStart>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
				<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			</casing_liner_tubing_run>
		</casing_liner_tubing>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-01T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>squeeze</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">13.02</casingStrDia>
			<comments>It must be emphasized, once again, that the descriptive power of the base component cannot be arbitrary in the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1166</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Let us continue to suppose that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not a</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1198</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.95</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1103</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1095</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.6</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>Conversely, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is unspecified with respect to a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>It may be, then, that an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respect t</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1089</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.56</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1058</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1014</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.43</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the systematic use of complex symbols is not quite equivalent to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>true</topPlug>
			<botPlug>false</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1136</presBump>
			<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
			<rotated>false</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<cementStage>
			<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
			<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-01T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
			<jobType>plug</jobType>
			<casingStrDia uom="in">10.02</casingStrDia>
			<comments>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not quite equivalent to a
descriptive fact.</comments>
			<volReturns uom="m3">1095</volReturns>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>From C1, it follows that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified wi</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1000</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.65</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1189</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1167</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.46</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified with respect to an important distinction in language use.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<cementingFluid>
				<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
				<descFluid>Suppose, for instance, that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds i</descFluid>
				<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1081</ratioMixWater>
				<density uom="sg">2.2</density>
				<volPumped uom="m3">1122</volPumped>
				<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1179</yp>
				<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
				<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.18</pcFreeWater>
				<comments>On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar does not readily tolerate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.</comments>
			</cementingFluid>
			<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
			<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
			<topPlug>false</topPlug>
			<botPlug>true</botPlug>
			<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
			<presBump uom="bar">1162</presBump>
			<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
			<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
			<rotated>true</rotated>
		</cementStage>
		<fluid uid="7163b1a1-314c-11e1-9a22-5490384b2405">
			<type>Oil Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3437.1</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3450.68</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">632.72</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>other</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.48</density>
			<pv uom="Pa.s">0.13</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">8.0</yp>
		</fluid>
		<fluid uid="7163b1a2-314c-11e1-85c1-5490384b2405">
			<type>Mud Base</type>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3142.84</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3043.67</tvd>
			<presBopRating uom="bar">689.51</presBopRating>
			<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
			<density uom="g/cm3">1.24</density>
			<pv uom="Pa.s">0.74</pv>
			<yp uom="Pa">7.98</yp>
		</fluid>
		<porePressure uid="7163d8b0-314c-11e1-8fb8-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.9</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3167.71</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3037.68</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<porePressure uid="7163d8b1-314c-11e1-bfcb-5490384b2405">
			<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
			<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.9</equivalentMudWeight>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3189.2</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3141.03</tvd>
		</porePressure>
		<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z">It may be, then, tha Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3050.71</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3153.81</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.14</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">75.78</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3182.19</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3030.49</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.93</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">74.37</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3189.05</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3179.91</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.42</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">77.27</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3127.8</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3020.9</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.3</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">70.94</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3018.97</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3071.19</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.57</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">76.39</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<surveyStation>
			<dTim>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3187.4</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3173.44</tvd>
			<incl uom="dega">0.83</incl>
			<azi uom="dega">70.46</azi>
		</surveyStation>
		<activity uid="71644de1-314c-11e1-baf7-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3191.15</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>fixed</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71644de2-314c-11e1-9e64-5490384b2405">3104.1</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, an im</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="716474ee-314c-11e1-bd03-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3184.68</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>bop test</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="716474ef-314c-11e1-9756-5490384b2405">3174.05</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It must be emphasized, once again, that the earlier discussion of deviance is, apparently, determine</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="71649c00-314c-11e1-8076-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3037.88</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>snub</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71649c01-314c-11e1-b48a-5490384b2405">3158.97</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the descriptive power of the ba</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="7164c30f-314c-11e1-a3cf-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3000.59</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>fixed</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7164c310-314c-11e1-a7e8-5490384b2405">3096.1</mdHoleStart>
			<state>ok</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft This suggests that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not quite equivalent</comments>
		</activity>
		<activity uid="7164ea1e-314c-11e1-8bbe-5490384b2405">
			<dTimStart>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
			<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">3096.18</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
			<phase>bop test</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
			<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7164ea1f-314c-11e1-bb6d-5490384b2405">3114.94</mdHoleStart>
			<state>fail</state>
			<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
			<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Analogously, the earlier discussion of deviance does not readily tolerate nondistinctness in the sen</comments>
		</activity>
		<logInfo uid="71651130-314c-11e1-9053-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>1</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2281.59</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2148.07</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1189</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1187</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Electrical</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">119.68</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">19.69</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4239.91</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1153</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="71653840-314c-11e1-b809-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>2</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2161.34</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2415.96</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1149</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1164</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Acoustic</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">119.3</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">16.18</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4443.12</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1151</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<logInfo uid="71653841-314c-11e1-ba22-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<runNumber>1</runNumber>
			<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2340.59</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2233.16</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1150</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1181</tvdBottom>
			<tool>Gamma</tool>
			<tempBHST uom="degC">111.47</tempBHST>
			<eTimStatic uom="h">18.8</eTimStatic>	
			<mdTempTool uom="m">4285.43</mdTempTool>
			<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1100</tvdTempTool>
		</logInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="71655f4f-314c-11e1-9c92-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1502</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1704.17</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1400.97</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1764.13</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">282.06</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">93.63</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">203</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Clearly, a subset of English sentences i</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="7165865e-314c-11e1-96a4-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1531</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1714.39</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1438.83</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1781.89</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">293.42</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">91.61</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">214</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Clearly, a case of semigrammaticalness o</coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<coreInfo uid="7165ad70-314c-11e1-9ada-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1559</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1559.46</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1495.27</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1725.2</tvdBottom>
			<lenRecovered uom="m">273.67</lenRecovered>
			<recoverPc uom="%">96.87</recoverPc>
			<lenBarrel uom="m">224</lenBarrel>
			<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
			<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Let us continue to suppose that most of </coreDescription>
		</coreInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="7165d480-314c-11e1-b8d2-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>drill stem test</testType>
			<testNumber>2</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1709.82</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1841.53</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1735.74</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1847.53</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">324.69</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.7</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.1</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.74</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.62</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.07</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">139.35</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.63</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">37.69</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">12</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">21</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">4</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">8</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.33</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.83</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.75</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">36.32</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<wellTestInfo uid="7165fb8f-314c-11e1-b2db-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<testType>production test</testType>
			<testNumber>1</testNumber>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1742.31</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1783.16</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1793.38</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1799.03</tvdBottom>
			<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">325.38</chokeOrificeSize>
			<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.1</densityOil>
			<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.1</densityWater>
			<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.24</densityGas>
			<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.31</flowRateOil>
			<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.47</flowRateWater>
			<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">131.45</flowRateGas>
			<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
			<presFlowing uom="MPa">34.88</presFlowing>
			<presBottom uom="MPa">35.49</presBottom>
			<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
			<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
			<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
			<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
			<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
			<volOilTotal uom="m3">9.08</volOilTotal>
			<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">98.64</volGasTotal>
			<volWaterTotal uom="m3">8.49</volWaterTotal>
			<volOilStored uom="m3">35.72</volOilStored>
		</wellTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="716622a1-314c-11e1-a2f5-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1518</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1405.57</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">16.22</presPore>
			<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1514</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.4</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">21204.44</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Furthermore, the systematic use of complex symbols may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a gen</description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<formTestInfo uid="716649b0-314c-11e1-b223-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">1504</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1480.27</tvd>
			<presPore uom="MPa">16.71</presPore>
			<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
			<mdSample uom="m">1535</mdSample>
			<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
			<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.53</densityHC>
			<volumeSample uom="dm3">11289.79</volumeSample>
			<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH So far, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is unspecified with respect to the traditional pra</description>
		</formTestInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="716649b1-314c-11e1-b2ea-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1511</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1908.99</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1421.74</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1814.91</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC suffices to account</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology Notice, incidentally, that the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from an abstract u</lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<lithShowInfo uid="716670c0-314c-11e1-9a69-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1503</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1923.73</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1415.82</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1859.49</tvdBottom>
			<show>Shows In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), this analysis of a formative as a pair of s</show>
			<lithology>Description of lithology On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar does not affect the structure of the levels of </lithology>
		</lithShowInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="716697d1-314c-11e1-8a99-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2529.27</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1168</tvd>
			<equipClass>hoisting equ -- travelling block</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">79</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. It may be, then, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial suffices t</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<equipFailureInfo uid="7166bee1-314c-11e1-8955-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<md datum="KB" uom="m">2530.87</md>
			<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1162</tvd>
			<equipClass>hoisting equ -- travelling block</equipClass>
			<eTimMissProduction uom="min">73</eTimMissProduction>
			<dTimRepair>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
			<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. We have already seen that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort appears to correlate rat</description>
		</equipFailureInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="7166e5f0-314c-11e1-a9c1-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3245.21</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3147.43</tvdInflow>
			<phase>snub</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">492.92</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-01T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">8.6</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3212.79</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.41</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.31</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3228.55</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.05</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">80.65</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">86.4</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
			<formation>We will bring evidence in favor of the f</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">116.54</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.93</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" It appears that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is, apparently, determined by problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<controlIncidentInfo uid="71670d00-314c-11e1-aa1b-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3230.01</mdInflow>
			<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3046.6</tvdInflow>
			<phase>wire line</phase>
			<proprietaryCode>drilling -- underream</proprietaryCode>
			<eTimLost uom="min">496.78</eTimLost>
			<dTimRegained>2011-01-01T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
			<diaBit uom="in">7.17</diaBit>
			<mdBit uom="m">3237.1</mdBit>
			<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.38</wtMud>
			<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.74</porePressure>
			<diaCsgLast uom="in">6</diaCsgLast>
			<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3240.24</mdCsgLast>
			<volMudGained uom="m3">1.12</volMudGained>
			<presShutInCasing uom="bar">84.54</presShutInCasing>
			<presShutInDrill uom="bar">84.64</presShutInDrill>
			<incidentType>gas kick</incidentType>
			<killingType>lubricate and bleed</killingType>
			<formation>Clearly, the earlier discussion of devia</formation>
			<tempBottom uom="degC">138.34</tempBottom>
			<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.62</presMaxChoke>
			<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Suppose, for instance, that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier delimits problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</description>
		</controlIncidentInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="71675b1e-314c-11e1-879b-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3274.33</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3114.75</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, appare</description>
		</stratInfo>
		<stratInfo uid="7167822e-314c-11e1-bcd6-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3243.93</mdTop>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3135.98</tvdTop>
			<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Conversely, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial </description>
		</stratInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="7167822f-314c-11e1-9ae4-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3383.38</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3374.05</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3264.41</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3226.37</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<perfInfo uid="7167a940-314c-11e1-9faa-5490384b2405">
			<dTimOpen>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
			<dTimClose>2011-01-01T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3341.46</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3306.01</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop uom="m">3204.23</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom uom="m">3294.03</tvdBottom>
		</perfInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="7167a941-314c-11e1-93ee-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1419</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1834.55</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1419.77</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1870.36</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">73</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">30</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">7</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">9</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">7</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">5</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">5</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
		<gasReadingInfo uid="7167d04f-314c-11e1-8899-5490384b2405">
			<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
			<readingType>drilling background gas</readingType>
			<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1473</mdTop>
			<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1819.95</mdBottom>
			<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1448.83</tvdTop>
			<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1847.55</tvdBottom>
			<gasHigh uom="%">75</gasHigh>
			<gasLow uom="%">36</gasLow>
			<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
			<eth uom="ppm">7</eth>
			<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
			<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
			<nbut uom="ppm">9</nbut>
			<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
		</gasReadingInfo>
	</drillReport>
</drillReports>