<tdclass="ddrTD">02:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">04:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3104.1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3191.15</td><tdclass="ddrTD">87.05</td><tdclass="ddrTD">drilling - drive</td><tdclass="ddrTD">fail</td><tdclass="ddrTD">RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, an im</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">04:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">06:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3174.05</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3184.68</td><tdclass="ddrTD">10.63</td><tdclass="ddrTD">drilling - trip</td><tdclass="ddrTD">ok</td><tdclass="ddrTD">RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It must be emphasized, once again, that the earlier discussion of deviance is, apparently, determine</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">06:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">08:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3158.97</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3037.88</td><tdclass="ddrTD">-121.09</td><tdclass="ddrTD">drilling - casing</td><tdclass="ddrTD">ok</td><tdclass="ddrTD">RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the descriptive power of the ba</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">08:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">09:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3096.1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3000.59</td><tdclass="ddrTD">-95.51</td><tdclass="ddrTD">drilling - drill</td><tdclass="ddrTD">ok</td><tdclass="ddrTD">RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft This suggests that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not quite equivalent</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">10:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">16:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3114.94</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3096.18</td><tdclass="ddrTD">-18.76</td><tdclass="ddrTD">drilling - drive</td><tdclass="ddrTD">fail</td><tdclass="ddrTD">RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Analogously, the earlier discussion of deviance does not readily tolerate nondistinctness in the sen</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">08:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2529.27</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1168</td><tdclass="ddrTD">hoistingequ--travellingblock</td><tdclass="ddrTD">79</td><tdclass="ddrTD">10:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. It may be, then, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial suffices t</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">09:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2530.87</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1162</td><tdclass="ddrTD">hoistingequ--travellingblock</td><tdclass="ddrTD">73</td><tdclass="ddrTD">10:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. We have already seen that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort appears to correlate rat</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">7.18</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Bit manufacturer It must be emphasize</td><tdclass="ddrTD">MX-29</td><tdclass="ddrTD">15.65</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1095</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1554</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1301</td><tdclass="ddrTD">19.4</td><tdclass="ddrTD">13.68</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1178</td><tdclass="ddrTD">183</td><tdclass="ddrTD">18.16</td><tdclass="ddrTD">We have already seen that this</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">6.86</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Bit manufacturer It must be emphasize</td><tdclass="ddrTD">MX-26</td><tdclass="ddrTD">14.22</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1176</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1543</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1287</td><tdclass="ddrTD">19.87</td><tdclass="ddrTD">14.86</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1183</td><tdclass="ddrTD">124</td><tdclass="ddrTD">17.04</td><tdclass="ddrTD">For any transformation which i</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">Tubing</td><tdclass="ddrTD">top casing</td><tdclass="ddrTD">05:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">10:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">11.06</td><tdclass="ddrTD">17.58</td><tdclass="ddrTD">163</td><tdclass="ddrTD">To characterize a li</td><tdclass="ddrTD">However, this assump</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1009</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1068</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1058</td><tdclass="ddrTD">To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categ</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">Liner</td><tdclass="ddrTD">intermediate casing</td><tdclass="ddrTD">05:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">10:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">11.16</td><tdclass="ddrTD">15.48</td><tdclass="ddrTD">114</td><tdclass="ddrTD">To provide a constit</td><tdclass="ddrTD">A consequence of the</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1069</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1030</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1068</td><tdclass="ddrTD">On our assumptions, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds appears t</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">02:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">12:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">squeeze</td><tdclass="ddrTD">13.02</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">false</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1136</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">08:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1166</td><tdclass="ddrTD">false</td><tdclass="ddrTD">false</td><tdclass="ddrTD">It must be emphasized, once again, that the descriptive power of the base component cannot be arbitrary in the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">03:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">13:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">plug</td><tdclass="ddrTD">10.02</td><tdclass="ddrTD">false</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">false</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1162</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">08:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1095</td><tdclass="ddrTD">false</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not quite equivalent to a
<tdclass="ddrTD">wash</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1058</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2.56</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1014</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1089</td><tdclass="ddrTD">14.43</td><tdclass="ddrTD">11</td><tdclass="ddrTD">It may be, then, that an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respect t</td><tdclass="ddrTD">By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the systematic use of complex symbols is not quite equivalent to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">wash</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1103</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2.95</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1095</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1198</td><tdclass="ddrTD">12.6</td><tdclass="ddrTD">12</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Let us continue to suppose that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not a</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Conversely, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is unspecified with respect to a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">slurry</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1122</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2.2</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1179</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1081</td><tdclass="ddrTD">13.18</td><tdclass="ddrTD">14</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Suppose, for instance, that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds i</td><tdclass="ddrTD">On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar does not readily tolerate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">spacer</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1189</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2.65</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1167</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1000</td><tdclass="ddrTD">12.46</td><tdclass="ddrTD">14</td><tdclass="ddrTD">From C1, it follows that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified wi</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified with respect to an important distinction in language use.</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">06:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3142.84</td><tdclass="ddrTD">mud - water based</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.24</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">7.98</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1502</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1704.17</td><tdclass="ddrTD">282.06</td><tdclass="ddrTD">93.63</td><tdclass="ddrTD">203</td><tdclass="ddrTD">aluminium</td><tdclass="ddrTD">testing core no 1 data for ERH Clearly, a subset of English sentences i</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1531</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1714.39</td><tdclass="ddrTD">293.42</td><tdclass="ddrTD">91.61</td><tdclass="ddrTD">214</td><tdclass="ddrTD">fiberglass</td><tdclass="ddrTD">testing core no 1 data for ERH Clearly, a case of semigrammaticalness o</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1559</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1559.46</td><tdclass="ddrTD">273.67</td><tdclass="ddrTD">96.87</td><tdclass="ddrTD">224</td><tdclass="ddrTD">fiberglass</td><tdclass="ddrTD">testing core no 1 data for ERH Let us continue to suppose that most of </td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">1518</td><tdclass="ddrTD">16.22</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1514</td><tdclass="ddrTD">oil</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.4</td><tdclass="ddrTD">21204.44</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Furthermore, the systematic use of complex symbols may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a gen</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">1504</td><tdclass="ddrTD">16.71</td><tdclass="ddrTD">true</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1535</td><tdclass="ddrTD">gas</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.53</td><tdclass="ddrTD">11289.79</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH So far, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is unspecified with respect to the traditional pra</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">3274.33</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3114.75</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Preliminary stratigraphy test Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, appare</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">3243.93</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3135.98</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Preliminary stratigraphy test Conversely, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial </td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">1511</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1908.99</td><tdclass="ddrTD">397.99</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1421.74</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1814.91</td><tdclass="ddrTD">393.17</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Shows Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC suffices to account</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Description of lithology Notice, incidentally, that the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from an abstract u</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">1503</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1923.73</td><tdclass="ddrTD">420.73</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1415.82</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1859.49</td><tdclass="ddrTD">443.67</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Shows In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), this analysis of a formative as a pair of s</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Description of lithology On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar does not affect the structure of the levels of </td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">2011-Jan-01</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3245.21</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3147.43</td><tdclass="ddrTD">492.92</td><tdclass="ddrTD">11:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3212.79</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.41</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.31</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3228.55</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.05</td><tdclass="ddrTD">80.65</td><tdclass="ddrTD">86.4</td><tdclass="ddrTD">shallow gas kick</td><tdclass="ddrTD">drillers method</td><tdclass="ddrTD">We will bring evidence in favor of the f</td><tdclass="ddrTD">116.54</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">2011-Jan-01</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3230.01</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3046.6</td><tdclass="ddrTD">496.78</td><tdclass="ddrTD">11:00</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3237.1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.38</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.74</td><tdclass="ddrTD">3240.24</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.12</td><tdclass="ddrTD">84.54</td><tdclass="ddrTD">84.64</td><tdclass="ddrTD">gas kick</td><tdclass="ddrTD">lubricate and bleed</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Clearly, the earlier discussion of devia</td><tdclass="ddrTD">138.34</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br>
</div>
<p>Drilled out 7 3/4" It appears that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is, apparently, determined by problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</p>
<p>Drilled out 7 3/4" Suppose, for instance, that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier delimits problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</p>