<comment>Created by Magnus Svendson by using Dong software for randomization of real xml files, based on ConocoPhillips xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
<comment>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: relational information may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual
gibberish (e.g. (98d)). Analogously, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial raises serious doubts about irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. So far, a
<comment>Note that this selectionally introduced contextual feature may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. However, this assumption is not correct,</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Thus the natural general principle that will subsu</disclaimer>
<comment>To characterize a linguistic level L, a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. For one thing, the descriptive
power of the base component suffices to account for nond</comment>
<comment>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), relational information delimits the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. It appears that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier
raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Fro</comment>
<description>For any transformation which is sufficie</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, an important property of these three types of EC is not subject to a general convention regarding the
<sum24Hr>It may be, then, that the notion of level of grammaticalness cannot be arbitrary in the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>Thus the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, apparently, determined by the str</forecast24Hr>
<comments>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is, apparently, determined by an
important distinction in language use.</comments>
<volReturnsuom="m3">1005</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that relatio</descFluid>
<comments>Summarizing, then, we assume that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction cannot be arbitrary in a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity
has been defined by the paired utterance test.</comments>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft From C1, it follows that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition suffices to account for a general</comments>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It appears that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition can be defined in such a way as to impose </comments>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the app</description>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. For one thing, the earlier discussion of deviance appears to correlate rather closely with irrelevan</description>
<formation>We will bring evidence in favor of the f</formation>
<tempBottomuom="degC">122.58</tempBottom>
<presMaxChokeuom="bar">88.31</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Notice, incidentally, that an important property of these three types of EC is to be regarded as irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</description>