data.posccaesar.org / npd

Go to a project
Toggle navigation Toggle navigation pinning
David Price
665c0e0b 1 parent 69065a9b

Official EPIM DDR Test Case Upload

Inline Side-by-side
Showing 24 changed files with 9303 additions and 0 deletions
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<witsml:drillReports version="1.4.0.0" xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series http://www.npd.no/schema/DDRS/1series/WITSML_drillReport_profiled_schema_phase2.xsd">
<witsml:documentInfo>
<witsml:documentName>Drill Report</witsml:documentName>
<witsml:documentDate>2011-09-27T11:08:10.001Z</witsml:documentDate>
<witsml:owner>ConocoPhillips</witsml:owner>
</witsml:documentInfo>
<witsml:drillReport>
<witsml:nameWell>2/4-K-08</witsml:nameWell>
<witsml:nameWellbore>2/4-K-8 B</witsml:nameWellbore>
<witsml:name>2/4-K-8</witsml:name>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-27T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:versionKind>normal</witsml:versionKind>
<witsml:createDate>2011-09-27T11:08:10.001Z</witsml:createDate>
<witsml:wellAlias>
<witsml:name>2/4-K-08</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD code</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:wellAlias>
<witsml:wellboreAlias>
<witsml:name>2/4-K-8 B</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD code</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:wellboreAlias>
<witsml:wellboreAlias>
<witsml:name>6609</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD number</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:wellboreAlias>
<witsml:wellDatum>
<witsml:name>Kelly Bushing</witsml:name>
<witsml:code>KB</witsml:code>
<witsml:elevation uom="m" datum="SL">56.271</witsml:elevation>
</witsml:wellDatum>
<witsml:wellDatum>
<witsml:name>Sea Level</witsml:name>
<witsml:code>SL</witsml:code>
</witsml:wellDatum>
<witsml:wellCRS>
<witsml:name>ED50</witsml:name>
<witsml:geographic>
<witsml:geodeticDatumCode>ED50</witsml:geodeticDatumCode>
</witsml:geographic>
</witsml:wellCRS>
<witsml:wellboreInfo>
<witsml:dTimSpud>1986-06-06T13:15:00.000Z</witsml:dTimSpud>
<witsml:dTimPreSpud>1982-06-06T13:15:00.000Z</witsml:dTimPreSpud>
<witsml:operator>ConocoPhillips</witsml:operator>
<witsml:drillContractor>ARCHER</witsml:drillContractor>
<witsml:rigAlias>
<witsml:name>EKOFISK K</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD Name</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:rigAlias>
<witsml:rigAlias>
<witsml:name>271469</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD code</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:rigAlias>
</witsml:wellboreInfo>
<witsml:statusInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-26T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1250.948</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">987.092</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:mdPlugTop uom="m">786.876</witsml:mdPlugTop>
<witsml:diaHole uom="in">43.33</witsml:diaHole>
<witsml:mdDiaHoleStart uom="m">1187.87</witsml:mdDiaHoleStart>
<witsml:diaPilot uom="in"> 45.55</witsml:diaPilot>
<witsml:mdDiaPilotPlan uom="m"> 1100.87</witsml:mdDiaPilotPlan>
<witsml:typeWellbore>sidetrack</witsml:typeWellbore>
<witsml:mdKickoff uom="m">1735.58</witsml:mdKickoff>
<witsml:tvdKickoff uom="m">785.98</witsml:tvdKickoff>
<witsml:strengthForm uom="g/cm3">123</witsml:strengthForm>
<witsml:mdStrengthForm uom="m">600.67</witsml:mdStrengthForm>
<witsml:tvdStrengthForm uom="m">598.00</witsml:tvdStrengthForm>
<witsml:diaCsgLast uom="in">10.75</witsml:diaCsgLast>
<witsml:mdCsgLast uom="m">1135.885</witsml:mdCsgLast>
<witsml:tvdCsgLast uom="m">1123.98</witsml:tvdCsgLast>
<witsml:presTestType>leak off test</witsml:presTestType>
<witsml:distDrill uom="m">45.89</witsml:distDrill>
<witsml:elevKelly uom="m">56.693</witsml:elevKelly>
<witsml:sum24Hr>Change powerloop on eagle while waiting on GeoPilot, change plans, rih with cement stinger to plug back.</witsml:sum24Hr>
<witsml:forecast24Hr>Set balanced cement plug and pooh with cement stinger. Rih with drilling BHA.</witsml:forecast24Hr>
<witsml:ropCurrent uom="m/h">6.22</witsml:ropCurrent>
</witsml:statusInfo>
<witsml:bitRecord>
<witsml:numBit>1</witsml:numBit>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">46.6</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:manufacturer>Small Bit Builder Inc</witsml:manufacturer>
<witsml:codeMfg>SBB</witsml:codeMfg>
</witsml:bitRecord>
<witsml:bitRecord>
<witsml:numBit>2</witsml:numBit>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">48.76</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:manufacturer>Big Bit Builder Inc</witsml:manufacturer>
<witsml:codeMfg>BBB</witsml:codeMfg>
</witsml:bitRecord>
<witsml:fluid>
<witsml:type>Warp</witsml:type>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-26T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1807.818</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">987.108</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:presBopRating uom="bar">344.738</witsml:presBopRating>
<witsml:mudClass>oil based</witsml:mudClass>
<witsml:density uom="g/cm3">1.737</witsml:density>
<witsml:pv uom="mPa.s">35</witsml:pv>
<witsml:yp uom="Pa">4.309</witsml:yp>
</witsml:fluid>
<witsml:fluid>
<witsml:type>Warp</witsml:type>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-26T01:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1834.818</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">999.108</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:presBopRating uom="bar">355.738</witsml:presBopRating>
<witsml:mudClass>water based</witsml:mudClass>
<witsml:density uom="g/cm3">1.675</witsml:density>
<witsml:pv uom="mPa.s">37</witsml:pv>
<witsml:yp uom="Pa">5.309</witsml:yp>
</witsml:fluid>
<witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:readingKind>estimated</witsml:readingKind>
<witsml:equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">23.1</witsml:equivalentMudWeight>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-27T12:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1134.87</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">865.09</witsml:tvd>
</witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:readingKind>measured</witsml:readingKind>
<witsml:equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">23.5</witsml:equivalentMudWeight>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-27T22:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1145.84</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">895.08</witsml:tvd>
</witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:extendedReport dTim="2011-09-27T01:45:00.001Z">Rih with cement stinger @ 7385 ft</witsml:extendedReport>
<witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-27T22:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1178.03</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">799.67</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">66.6</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">55.5</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-27T23:30:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1187.03</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">812.67</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">68.6</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">53.5</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-26T00:30:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m" datum="KB">1153.93</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">786.65</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- other</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>equipment failure</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Clean and clear rigfloor</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T00:30:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-26T10:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m" datum="KB">0</witsml:md>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- other</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>operation failed</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Wait on GeoPilot BHA on Far Server ETA 09:00 Meanwhile change powerloop on eagle, perform PM on drawwork and Torquewinder. Perform anticollision test.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T10:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-26T12:30:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">0</witsml:md>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- other</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>equipment failure</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Receive Geopilot BHA. Prepare same on deck.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T12:30:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-26T12:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">0</witsml:md>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- other</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>equipment failure</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Hold pre job meeting prior to p/u new BHA.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T12:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-26T14:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">0</witsml:md>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>equipment failure</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>P/u Geopilot and MWD. Contra order from town. Plan for cmt back open hole and plan new kick off. L/d Geopilot and MWD. Order 3 1/2" DP cmt stinger from ELDA.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T14:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-26T17:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">0</witsml:md>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- other</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>equipment failure</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Wait on cmt stinger from ELDA, meanwhile clean rig floor. Prepare handling equipment for 3 1/2" DP. Rig maintenance.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T17:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-26T19:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">144.78</witsml:md>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>equipment failure</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>P/u 15 jnts 3 1/2" dp cmt stinger and rih to 475 ft.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity>
<witsml:dTimStart>2011-09-26T19:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2011-09-27T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">2250.948</witsml:md>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>equipment failure</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Continue rih on 5" dp from 475 - 7385 ft.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:logInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-26T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:runNumber>1</witsml:runNumber>
<witsml:serviceCompany>Small Service Inc</witsml:serviceCompany>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1067.78</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1200.00</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">748.09</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">754.98</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:tool>Hammer</witsml:tool>
<witsml:tempBHCT uom="degC">85.6</witsml:tempBHCT>
<witsml:mdTempTool uom="m">1167.98</witsml:mdTempTool>
<witsml:tvdTempTool uom="m">789.65</witsml:tvdTempTool>
</witsml:logInfo>
<witsml:logInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2011-09-26T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:runNumber>1</witsml:runNumber>
<witsml:serviceCompany>Small Service Inc</witsml:serviceCompany>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1045.98</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1189.00</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">764.98</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">798.09</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:tool>Hammer</witsml:tool>
<witsml:tempBHST uom="degC">78.6</witsml:tempBHST>
<witsml:eTimStatic uom="h">2.3</witsml:eTimStatic>
<witsml:mdTempTool uom="m">1234.09</witsml:mdTempTool>
<witsml:tvdTempTool uom="m">765.98</witsml:tvdTempTool>
</witsml:logInfo>
<witsml:coreInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:coreNumber>1</witsml:coreNumber>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1234</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1244</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1212</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1287</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:lenRecovered uom="m">173</witsml:lenRecovered>
<witsml:recoverPc uom="%">89.9</witsml:recoverPc>
<witsml:lenBarrel uom="m">33.3</witsml:lenBarrel>
<witsml:innerBarrelType>aluminum</witsml:innerBarrelType>
<witsml:coreDescription>bla bla bla</witsml:coreDescription>
</witsml:coreInfo>
<witsml:coreInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:30:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:coreNumber>2</witsml:coreNumber>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1564</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1734</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1283</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1223</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:lenRecovered uom="m">154</witsml:lenRecovered>
<witsml:recoverPc uom="%">89.7</witsml:recoverPc>
<witsml:lenBarrel uom="m">37.3</witsml:lenBarrel>
<witsml:innerBarrelType>fiberglass</witsml:innerBarrelType>
<witsml:coreDescription>Core information about core info no. 2 </witsml:coreDescription>
</witsml:coreInfo>
<witsml:wellTestInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:testType>production test</witsml:testType>
<witsml:testNumber>1</witsml:testNumber>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1234.5</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">2345.6</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1234.5</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">2345.5</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">32.1</witsml:chokeOrificeSize>
<witsml:densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.86</witsml:densityOil>
<witsml:densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.03</witsml:densityWater>
<witsml:densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.06</witsml:densityGas>
<witsml:flowRateOil uom="m3/d">77.7</witsml:flowRateOil>
<witsml:flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.7</witsml:flowRateWater>
<witsml:flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">88.8</witsml:flowRateGas>
<witsml:presShutIn uom="MPa">44.4</witsml:presShutIn>
<witsml:presFlowing uom="MPa">33.3</witsml:presFlowing>
<witsml:presBottom uom="MPa">22.2</witsml:presBottom>
<witsml:gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">23</witsml:gasOilRatio>
<witsml:waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">0.33</witsml:waterOilRatio>
<witsml:chloride uom="ppm">22.2</witsml:chloride>
<witsml:carbonDioxide uom="ppm">11.1</witsml:carbonDioxide>
<witsml:hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">7.3</witsml:hydrogenSulfide>
<witsml:volOilTotal uom="m3">9999</witsml:volOilTotal>
<witsml:volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">666</witsml:volGasTotal>
<witsml:volWaterTotal uom="m3">55</witsml:volWaterTotal>
<witsml:volOilStored uom="m3">1365</witsml:volOilStored>
</witsml:wellTestInfo>
<witsml:wellTestInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:45:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:testType>drill stem test</witsml:testType>
<witsml:testNumber>2</witsml:testNumber>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1256.5</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">2835.6</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1044.5</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">2245.5</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">37.1</witsml:chokeOrificeSize>
<witsml:densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.76</witsml:densityOil>
<witsml:densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.43</witsml:densityWater>
<witsml:densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.86</witsml:densityGas>
<witsml:flowRateOil uom="m3/d">79.4</witsml:flowRateOil>
<witsml:flowRateWater uom="m3/d">6.7</witsml:flowRateWater>
<witsml:flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">82.8</witsml:flowRateGas>
<witsml:presShutIn uom="MPa">49.4</witsml:presShutIn>
<witsml:presFlowing uom="MPa">30.3</witsml:presFlowing>
<witsml:presBottom uom="MPa">26.2</witsml:presBottom>
<witsml:gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">27</witsml:gasOilRatio>
<witsml:waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">0.83</witsml:waterOilRatio>
<witsml:chloride uom="ppm">29.2</witsml:chloride>
<witsml:carbonDioxide uom="ppm">15.1</witsml:carbonDioxide>
<witsml:hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">8.3</witsml:hydrogenSulfide>
<witsml:volOilTotal uom="m3">9599</witsml:volOilTotal>
<witsml:volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">626</witsml:volGasTotal>
<witsml:volWaterTotal uom="m3">59</witsml:volWaterTotal>
<witsml:volOilStored uom="m3">1345</witsml:volOilStored>
</witsml:wellTestInfo>
<witsml:formTestInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1234.5</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">1234.5</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:presPore uom="MPa">66.5</witsml:presPore>
<witsml:goodSeal>true</witsml:goodSeal>
<witsml:mdSample uom="m">1224.3</witsml:mdSample>
<witsml:dominateComponent>oil</witsml:dominateComponent>
<witsml:densityHC uom="g/cm3">0.33</witsml:densityHC>
<witsml:volumeSample uom="dm3">11</witsml:volumeSample>
<witsml:description>Yada yada yada</witsml:description>
</witsml:formTestInfo>
<witsml:formTestInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:23:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1734.5</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">1854.5</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:presPore uom="MPa">61.5</witsml:presPore>
<witsml:goodSeal>false</witsml:goodSeal>
<witsml:mdSample uom="m">1212.3</witsml:mdSample>
<witsml:dominateComponent>filtrate</witsml:dominateComponent>
<witsml:densityHC uom="g/cm3">0.73</witsml:densityHC>
<witsml:volumeSample uom="dm3">21</witsml:volumeSample>
<witsml:description>Fromation test informaiton </witsml:description>
</witsml:formTestInfo>
<witsml:lithShowInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1282.5</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1934.5</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1295.5</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1374.5</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:show>Shows description of this lito info </witsml:show>
<witsml:lithology>Description for line one.</witsml:lithology>
</witsml:lithShowInfo>
<witsml:lithShowInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:45:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1282.5</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1974.5</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1045.5</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1614.5</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:show>Shows description of the second lito info </witsml:show>
<witsml:lithology>Description for line two.</witsml:lithology>
</witsml:lithShowInfo>
<witsml:equipFailureInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1234.5</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">1123.76</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:equipClass>drill floor -- drilling control</witsml:equipClass>
<witsml:eTimMissProduction uom="min">180</witsml:eTimMissProduction>
<witsml:dTimRepair>2002-01-31T03:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTimRepair>
<witsml:description>valve stuck in failuere position </witsml:description>
</witsml:equipFailureInfo>
<witsml:equipFailureInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T04:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1245.5</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">1134.76</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:equipClass>drill floor -- draw works</witsml:equipClass>
<witsml:eTimMissProduction uom="min">178</witsml:eTimMissProduction>
<witsml:dTimRepair>2002-01-31T05:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTimRepair>
<witsml:description>valve stuck in wrong position again </witsml:description>
</witsml:equipFailureInfo>
<witsml:controlIncidentInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdInflow uom="m">1234.5</witsml:mdInflow>
<witsml:tvdInflow uom="m">1234</witsml:tvdInflow>
<witsml:phase>wire line</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>moving -- transit</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:eTimLost uom="min">16</witsml:eTimLost>
<witsml:dTimRegained>2001-12-31T02:16:00.000Z</witsml:dTimRegained>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">21</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:mdBit uom="m">123</witsml:mdBit>
<witsml:wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.23</witsml:wtMud>
<witsml:porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.12</witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:diaCsgLast uom="in">33</witsml:diaCsgLast>
<witsml:mdCsgLast uom="m">124</witsml:mdCsgLast>
<witsml:volMudGained uom="m3">112</witsml:volMudGained>
<witsml:presShutInCasing uom="bar">44</witsml:presShutInCasing>
<witsml:presShutInDrill uom="bar">33</witsml:presShutInDrill>
<witsml:incidentType>oil kick</witsml:incidentType>
<witsml:killingType>lubricate and bleed</witsml:killingType>
<witsml:formation>jura</witsml:formation>
<witsml:tempBottom uom="degC">258</witsml:tempBottom>
<witsml:presMaxChoke uom="bar">66.3</witsml:presMaxChoke>
<witsml:description>Incident one description</witsml:description>
</witsml:controlIncidentInfo>
<witsml:controlIncidentInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2008-12-31T03:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdInflow uom="m">1434.5</witsml:mdInflow>
<witsml:tvdInflow uom="m">1238</witsml:tvdInflow>
<witsml:phase>bop test</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>interruption -- maintain</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:eTimLost uom="min">13</witsml:eTimLost>
<witsml:dTimRegained>2001-12-31T03:13:00.000Z</witsml:dTimRegained>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">27</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:mdBit uom="m">129</witsml:mdBit>
<witsml:wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.24</witsml:wtMud>
<witsml:porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.19</witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:diaCsgLast uom="in">35</witsml:diaCsgLast>
<witsml:mdCsgLast uom="m">173</witsml:mdCsgLast>
<witsml:volMudGained uom="m3">132</witsml:volMudGained>
<witsml:presShutInCasing uom="bar">47</witsml:presShutInCasing>
<witsml:presShutInDrill uom="bar">34</witsml:presShutInDrill>
<witsml:incidentType>oil kick</witsml:incidentType>
<witsml:killingType>lubricate and bleed</witsml:killingType>
<witsml:formation>jura</witsml:formation>
<witsml:tempBottom uom="degC">259</witsml:tempBottom>
<witsml:presMaxChoke uom="bar">68.3</witsml:presMaxChoke>
<witsml:description>Decription for well control incident two.</witsml:description>
</witsml:controlIncidentInfo>
<witsml:stratInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:23:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1044.5</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1274</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:description>statinfo at first</witsml:description>
</witsml:stratInfo>
<witsml:stratInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:15:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1084.5</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1874</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:description>strat info at second</witsml:description>
</witsml:stratInfo>
<witsml:perfInfo>
<witsml:dTimOpen>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTimOpen>
<witsml:dTimClose>2001-12-31T13:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTimClose>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1033</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1234</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">999</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1100</witsml:tvdBottom>
</witsml:perfInfo>
<witsml:perfInfo>
<witsml:dTimOpen>2001-12-31T02:14:00.000Z</witsml:dTimOpen>
<witsml:dTimClose>2001-12-31T18:34:00.000Z</witsml:dTimClose>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1063</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1284</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">929</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1167</witsml:tvdBottom>
</witsml:perfInfo>
<witsml:gasReadingInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:00:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:readingType>shut down gas</witsml:readingType>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1234</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1256</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">999</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1120</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:gasHigh uom="%">77.7</witsml:gasHigh>
<witsml:gasLow uom="%">44.4</witsml:gasLow>
<witsml:meth uom="ppm">55</witsml:meth>
<witsml:eth uom="ppm">57</witsml:eth>
<witsml:prop uom="ppm">52</witsml:prop>
<witsml:ibut uom="ppm">59</witsml:ibut>
<witsml:nbut uom="ppm">56</witsml:nbut>
<witsml:ipent uom="ppm">51</witsml:ipent>
</witsml:gasReadingInfo>
<witsml:gasReadingInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2001-12-31T02:45:00.000Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:readingType>trip gas</witsml:readingType>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1834</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1272</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">983</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1830</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:gasHigh uom="%">70.7</witsml:gasHigh>
<witsml:gasLow uom="%">43.4</witsml:gasLow>
<witsml:meth uom="ppm">57</witsml:meth>
<witsml:eth uom="ppm">52</witsml:eth>
<witsml:prop uom="ppm">58</witsml:prop>
<witsml:ibut uom="ppm">59</witsml:ibut>
<witsml:nbut uom="ppm">51</witsml:nbut>
<witsml:ipent uom="ppm">56</witsml:ipent>
</witsml:gasReadingInfo>
</witsml:drillReport>
</witsml:drillReports>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<witsml:drillReports version="1.4.0.0" xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series http://www.npd.no/schema/DDRS/1series/WITSML_drillReport_profiled_schema_phase2.xsd">
<witsml:documentInfo>
<witsml:documentName>Drill Report</witsml:documentName>
<witsml:documentDate>2011-10-25T14:42:14.001Z</witsml:documentDate>
<witsml:owner>ConocoPhillips</witsml:owner>
</witsml:documentInfo>
<witsml:drillReport>
<witsml:nameWell xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">2/4-X-43 A</witsml:nameWell>
<witsml:nameWellbore xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">2/4-X-43 A</witsml:nameWellbore>
<witsml:name xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">2/4-X-43</witsml:name>
<witsml:dTimStart xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">2010-05-21T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:versionKind xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">normal</witsml:versionKind>
<witsml:createDate xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">2011-10-25T14:42:14.001Z</witsml:createDate>
<witsml:wellAlias xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:name>2/4-X-43 A</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD code</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:wellAlias>
<witsml:wellboreAlias xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:name>2/4-X-43 A</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD code</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:wellboreAlias>
<witsml:wellboreAlias xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:name>4539</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD number</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:wellboreAlias>
<witsml:wellDatum xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:name>Kelly Bushing</witsml:name>
<witsml:code>KB</witsml:code>
<witsml:elevation uom="m" datum="SL">21.946</witsml:elevation>
</witsml:wellDatum>
<witsml:wellDatum xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:name>Sea Level</witsml:name>
<witsml:code>SL</witsml:code>
</witsml:wellDatum>
<witsml:wellCRS xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:name>ED50</witsml:name>
<witsml:geographic>
<witsml:geodeticDatumCode>ED50</witsml:geodeticDatumCode>
</witsml:geographic>
</witsml:wellCRS>
<witsml:wellboreInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimSpud>2010-03-31T09:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimSpud>
<witsml:dateDrillComplete>2010-07-28</witsml:dateDrillComplete>
<witsml:operator>ConocoPhillips</witsml:operator>
<witsml:drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</witsml:drillContractor>
<witsml:rigAlias>
<witsml:name>EKOFISK X</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD Name</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:rigAlias>
<witsml:rigAlias>
<witsml:name>277293</witsml:name>
<witsml:namingSystem>NPD code</witsml:namingSystem>
</witsml:rigAlias>
</witsml:wellboreInfo>
<witsml:statusInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3263.494</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3107.553</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:diaPilot uom="in">0</witsml:diaPilot>
<witsml:mdDiaPilotPlan uom="m">0</witsml:mdDiaPilotPlan>
<witsml:tvdDiaPilotPlan uom="m">0</witsml:tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<witsml:typeWellbore>sidetrack</witsml:typeWellbore>
<witsml:mdKickoff uom="m">1627.937</witsml:mdKickoff>
<witsml:tvdKickoff uom="m">1554.396</witsml:tvdKickoff>
<witsml:mdStrengthForm uom="m">0</witsml:mdStrengthForm>
<witsml:diaCsgLast uom="in">7</witsml:diaCsgLast>
<witsml:mdCsgLast uom="m">3275.686</witsml:mdCsgLast>
<witsml:tvdCsgLast uom="m">3106.639</witsml:tvdCsgLast>
<witsml:presTestType>formation integrity test</witsml:presTestType>
<witsml:mdPlanned uom="m">0</witsml:mdPlanned>
<witsml:distDrill uom="m">0</witsml:distDrill>
<witsml:elevKelly uom="m">57.302</witsml:elevKelly>
<witsml:sum24Hr>RIH tag 7 3/4" landing collar at 10629ft. Test csg to 3500psi OK. Slip &amp; Cut drilling line. Light drilling of cement from 10631ft to float collar at 10702ft. Drill float, observed rapid increase in return flow. Close in well observe pressures.</witsml:sum24Hr>
<witsml:forecast24Hr>Drill shoe track, Drill Tor formation.</witsml:forecast24Hr>
</witsml:statusInfo>
<witsml:bitRecord xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:numBit>1</witsml:numBit>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">6.5</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:manufacturer>Hughes Christensen  </witsml:manufacturer>
<witsml:codeMfg>MX-20  </witsml:codeMfg>
</witsml:bitRecord>
<witsml:bitRecord xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:numBit>1</witsml:numBit>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">6.5</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:manufacturer>Hughes Christensen</witsml:manufacturer>
<witsml:codeMfg>MX-1</witsml:codeMfg>
</witsml:bitRecord>
<witsml:bitRecord xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:numBit>1</witsml:numBit>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">6.5</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:manufacturer>Hughes Christensen  </witsml:manufacturer>
<witsml:codeMfg>MX-18  </witsml:codeMfg>
</witsml:bitRecord>
<witsml:fluid xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:type>Oil Base</witsml:type>
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T22:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3276.6</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3107.553</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:presBopRating uom="bar">689.476</witsml:presBopRating>
<witsml:mudClass>oil based</witsml:mudClass>
<witsml:density uom="g/cm3">1.438</witsml:density>
<witsml:pv uom="mPa.s">25</witsml:pv>
<witsml:yp uom="Pa">7.182</witsml:yp>
</witsml:fluid>
<witsml:porePressure xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:readingKind>estimated</witsml:readingKind>
<witsml:equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.318</witsml:equivalentMudWeight>
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3297.936</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3128.889</witsml:tvd>
</witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:extendedReport dTim="2010-05-21T05:00:00.001Z" xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</witsml:extendedReport>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3155.808</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">2986.765</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.72</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">79.25</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3186.745</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3017.7</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.58</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">91.26</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3214.939</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3045.893</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.44</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">98.41</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3243.59</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3074.544</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.31</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">33.98</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3267.334</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3098.288</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.25</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">5.29</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3289.92</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3120.873</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.26</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">280.95</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3318.754</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3149.707</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.36</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">290.92</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3347.253</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3178.205</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.5</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">277.83</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3376.361</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3207.312</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.69</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">282.69</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3405.317</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3236.265</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">0.8</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">278.48</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3434.06</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3265.004</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">1.11</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">282.6</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3462.467</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3293.405</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">1.24</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">284.83</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3488.497</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3319.428</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">1.35</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">278.47</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:surveyStation xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">3494.532</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">3325.462</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:incl uom="dega">1.35</witsml:incl>
<witsml:azi uom="dega">278.47</witsml:azi>
</witsml:surveyStation>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T04:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3165.043</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T04:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T05:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3239.11</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- ream</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Wash down from 10384ft and tag landing collar at 10627ft with 200gpm 1440 psi</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T05:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T05:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3239.11</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Rack back stand, make up TIW and circ sub for casing test.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T05:45:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T06:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3239.11</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- pressure detection</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Test csg to 3500psi with 12.7ppg mud. Meanwhile prepare for Slip&amp;Cut Drilling line.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T06:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T08:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3239.11</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- pressure detection</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Slip &amp;cut drilling line.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T08:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T09:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3239.11</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- pressure detection</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Resett block position, check and test crow. o. matic</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T09:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T09:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3239.11</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- other</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Hold pre-job meeting prior to displace.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T09:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T10:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3239.11</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- other</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Hold choke drill with crew</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T10:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T13:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3240.024</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- circulating conditioning</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Displace well from 12.7 to 9.5 ppm Vesatec OBM. With 265gpm, 1700-2800psi.Meanwhile drill 3 ft cmt and Landing Collar at 10630ft, with 60 rpm 3-10 wob 60 rpm 9 kftlbs.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T13:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T14:30:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3261.055</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Drill soft cement from 10630ft to Float Colar at 10699ft with 300 gpm,0-2 klbs wob, 60 rpm, torque 9 kftlbs. Rop 50-80 fph.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T14:30:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T20:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3262.579</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>ok</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>success</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Drill float collar from 10699ft to 10704ft with 285gpm 1775psi, 30/80rpm 8/10kftlbs torque, 2/16klbs WOB.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T20:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-20T23:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3263.494</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- circulating conditioning</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>kick</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Obseved sudden increase in return flow, drop in WOB, increase in SPP. Picked off BTM. Flowcheck, positiv flow. Close in well on upper pipe Ram and closed choke. Observed pressure. SICP at 20:05, 866psi. At 20:30, 1236psi. At 21:00 1260psi. At 22:00 1274psi. Pump slowly into pipe to open float valve to establish SIDPP. Stopped pump when confirmed 50psi increase on casing gauge. SICP 1320psi and SIDPP 1320psi. Calculate Kill mud to be 12.0ppg. Pit gain 1.5bbl. Prepare Kill mud. Kick taken at 10707ft MD 10153ft TVD.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:activity xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimStart>2010-05-20T23:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimStart>
<witsml:dTimEnd>2010-05-21T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimEnd>
<witsml:md uom="m">3263.494</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">0</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- circulating conditioning</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:state>fail</witsml:state>
<witsml:stateDetailActivity>kick</witsml:stateDetailActivity>
<witsml:comments>Before start killing the well reduce SIDPP from 1320psi to 1270psi. Start pumping at 30spm holding csg press at 1270psi, ICP at 1740psi Pump kill fluid according to pump schedule from surface to Bit. FCP 640psi. Kill well using W&amp;W method.</witsml:comments>
</witsml:activity>
<witsml:logInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:runNumber>3</witsml:runNumber>
<witsml:serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</witsml:serviceCompany>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">2133.6</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">2438.4</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tool>*COPY* *COPY* Acoustic</witsml:tool>
<witsml:mdTempTool uom="m">4588.1</witsml:mdTempTool>
</witsml:logInfo>
<witsml:logInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:runNumber>2</witsml:runNumber>
<witsml:serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</witsml:serviceCompany>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1828.8</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">2133.6</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tool>*COPY* Acoustic</witsml:tool>
<witsml:mdTempTool uom="m">4566.2</witsml:mdTempTool>
</witsml:logInfo>
<witsml:logInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:runNumber>1</witsml:runNumber>
<witsml:serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</witsml:serviceCompany>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1524</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1828.8</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tool>Acoustic</witsml:tool>
<witsml:mdTempTool uom="m">5112.6</witsml:mdTempTool>
</witsml:logInfo>
<witsml:coreInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:coreNumber>1</witsml:coreNumber>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1524</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1828.8</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1462.309</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1741.274</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:lenRecovered uom="m">304.495</witsml:lenRecovered>
<witsml:recoverPc uom="%">99.9</witsml:recoverPc>
<witsml:lenBarrel uom="m">230</witsml:lenBarrel>
<witsml:innerBarrelType>aluminum</witsml:innerBarrelType>
<witsml:coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH</witsml:coreDescription>
</witsml:coreInfo>
<witsml:coreInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:coreNumber>2</witsml:coreNumber>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1828.8</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">2133.6</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1741.274</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">2023.381</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:lenRecovered uom="m">169.164</witsml:lenRecovered>
<witsml:recoverPc uom="%">55.5</witsml:recoverPc>
<witsml:lenBarrel uom="m">180</witsml:lenBarrel>
<witsml:innerBarrelType>fiberglass</witsml:innerBarrelType>
<witsml:coreDescription>testing core no 2 data for ERH</witsml:coreDescription>
</witsml:coreInfo>
<witsml:wellTestInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T14:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:testType>production test</witsml:testType>
<witsml:testNumber>1</witsml:testNumber>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1828.8</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1981.2</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1741.274</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1882.3</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">304.8</witsml:chokeOrificeSize>
<witsml:densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.979</witsml:densityOil>
<witsml:densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.678</witsml:densityWater>
<witsml:densityGas uom="g/cm3">0</witsml:densityGas>
<witsml:flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.744</witsml:flowRateOil>
<witsml:flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.744</witsml:flowRateWater>
<witsml:flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">124.594</witsml:flowRateGas>
<witsml:presShutIn uom="MPa">2</witsml:presShutIn>
<witsml:presFlowing uom="MPa">34.474</witsml:presFlowing>
<witsml:presBottom uom="MPa">35.853</witsml:presBottom>
<witsml:gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">12</witsml:gasOilRatio>
<witsml:waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">22</witsml:waterOilRatio>
<witsml:chloride uom="ppm">8</witsml:chloride>
<witsml:carbonDioxide uom="ppm">6</witsml:carbonDioxide>
<witsml:hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">7</witsml:hydrogenSulfide>
<witsml:volOilTotal uom="m3">6.995</witsml:volOilTotal>
<witsml:volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">93.446</witsml:volGasTotal>
<witsml:volWaterTotal uom="m3">9.539</witsml:volWaterTotal>
<witsml:volOilStored uom="m3">33</witsml:volOilStored>
</witsml:wellTestInfo>
<witsml:formTestInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T14:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">1524</witsml:md>
<witsml:tvd uom="m">1462.309</witsml:tvd>
<witsml:presPore uom="MPa">17.754</witsml:presPore>
<witsml:goodSeal>true</witsml:goodSeal>
<witsml:mdSample uom="m">1524</witsml:mdSample>
<witsml:dominateComponent>gas</witsml:dominateComponent>
<witsml:densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.558</witsml:densityHC>
<witsml:volumeSample uom="dm3">2861.771</witsml:volumeSample>
<witsml:description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH</witsml:description>
</witsml:formTestInfo>
<witsml:lithShowInfo>
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1524</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1981.2</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1462.309</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1882.3</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:show>Shows text description as</witsml:show>
<witsml:lithology>Description of lithology ..... as</witsml:lithology>
</witsml:lithShowInfo>
<witsml:equipFailureInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T10:30:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:md uom="m">2845.918</witsml:md>
<witsml:equipClass>service equ -- cementing unit</witsml:equipClass>
<witsml:eTimMissProduction uom="min">45</witsml:eTimMissProduction>
<witsml:dTimRepair>2010-05-20T11:15:00.001Z</witsml:dTimRepair>
<witsml:description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same.</witsml:description>
</witsml:equipFailureInfo>
<witsml:controlIncidentInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T20:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdInflow uom="m">3263.494</witsml:mdInflow>
<witsml:tvdInflow uom="m">3094.447</witsml:tvdInflow>
<witsml:phase>fixed</witsml:phase>
<witsml:proprietaryCode>drilling -- circulating conditioning</witsml:proprietaryCode>
<witsml:eTimLost uom="min">483.75</witsml:eTimLost>
<witsml:dTimRegained>2010-05-21T04:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimRegained>
<witsml:diaBit uom="in">6.5</witsml:diaBit>
<witsml:mdBit uom="m">3263.494</witsml:mdBit>
<witsml:wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.438</witsml:wtMud>
<witsml:porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.366</witsml:porePressure>
<witsml:diaCsgLast uom="in">7</witsml:diaCsgLast>
<witsml:mdCsgLast uom="m">3275.686</witsml:mdCsgLast>
<witsml:volMudGained uom="m3">0.238</witsml:volMudGained>
<witsml:presShutInCasing uom="bar">84.806</witsml:presShutInCasing>
<witsml:presShutInDrill uom="bar">84.806</witsml:presShutInDrill>
<witsml:incidentType>oil kick</witsml:incidentType>
<witsml:killingType>wait and weight</witsml:killingType>
<witsml:formation>EE</witsml:formation>
<witsml:tempBottom uom="degC">121.111</witsml:tempBottom>
<witsml:presMaxChoke uom="bar">84.806</witsml:presMaxChoke>
<witsml:description>Drilled out 7 3/4" float collar at 10704ft, observed rapid increase in the return flow. Increase in DP pressure and loss of WOB. Closed in well on upper pipe ram. observed pressures. SICP increased to 1230psi, Established SIDPP to 1230psi.Circulate 12.0 ppg kill fluid from surface to bit according to pumping schedule.Pump 2000 stks with pump pressure decreasing from ICP 1730 psi to FCP 640 psi at 30 spm.Pumped 500 stks past the bit and kill fluid above 7 3/4" PBR increase kill rate to 40 spm.New FCP 980psi. Gain/losses steady. No expanding gas. After 4500 stks observe slight gas increase after poor boy from 65 to 129 units. Well killed. Open BOP. Slight gain decreasing. Circulate with 285 gpm 2405 psi. ECD 12,3 steady, MWT in return 10.9 ppg for a short period. Circulate and condition mud to even weight of 12.ppg. Flow check well for 30 minutes. Well stable. Circulate b/u, no gas in returns. Kill operation completed.</witsml:description>
</witsml:controlIncidentInfo>
<witsml:stratInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T16:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">3356.762</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">3187.714</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:description>Preliminary stratigraphy test text as</witsml:description>
</witsml:stratInfo>
<witsml:perfInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimOpen>2010-05-20T05:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimOpen>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">3366.668</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">3378.708</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">3197.62</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">3209.658</witsml:tvdBottom>
</witsml:perfInfo>
<witsml:perfInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTimOpen>2010-05-20T07:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTimOpen>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">3392.576</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">3404.616</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">3223.525</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">3235.564</witsml:tvdBottom>
</witsml:perfInfo>
<witsml:gasReadingInfo xmlns:witsml="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series">
<witsml:dTim>2010-05-20T00:00:00.001Z</witsml:dTim>
<witsml:readingType>connection gas</witsml:readingType>
<witsml:mdTop uom="m">1524</witsml:mdTop>
<witsml:mdBottom uom="m">1981.2</witsml:mdBottom>
<witsml:tvdTop uom="m">1462.309</witsml:tvdTop>
<witsml:tvdBottom uom="m">1882.3</witsml:tvdBottom>
<witsml:gasHigh uom="%">66</witsml:gasHigh>
<witsml:gasLow uom="%">33</witsml:gasLow>
<witsml:meth uom="ppm">7</witsml:meth>
<witsml:eth uom="ppm">5</witsml:eth>
<witsml:prop uom="ppm">7</witsml:prop>
<witsml:ibut uom="ppm">6</witsml:ibut>
<witsml:nbut uom="ppm">8</witsml:nbut>
<witsml:ipent uom="ppm">9</witsml:ipent>
</witsml:gasReadingInfo>
</witsml:drillReport>
</witsml:drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-01</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-01</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-01</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-02T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-02T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="715f44cf-314c-11e1-b168-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-02T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), an important property of these three types of EC can be defined in such a way as to impose a stipulation to place the constructions into these
various categories. This suggests that a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="715f6bde-314c-11e1-8028-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-22T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respect to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex
</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Clearly, relational information is not subject to </disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="715fba00-314c-11e1-9f4c-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>It must be emphasized, once again, that relational information can be defined in such a way as to impose the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.
Furthermore, the systematic use of complex symbols app</comment>
</event>
<event uid="715fe10f-314c-11e1-a1aa-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>On the other hand, a descriptively adequate grammar is rather different from nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Presumably, this selectionally introduced contextual feature
can be defined in such a way as to impose the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the d</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report To characterize a li</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="7160081e-314c-11e1-a38e-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="7160081f-314c-11e1-abf2-5490384b2405" uid="71602f30-314c-11e1-af54-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-02T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="71602f31-314c-11e1-8130-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71602f32-314c-11e1-9b36-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71602f33-314c-11e1-819b-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="71602f34-314c-11e1-8ad0-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">I suggested that the</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">77.62</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">61.6</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="71605640-314c-11e1-8310-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>Clear</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">18.9</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">7.55</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>If the position of t</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Conversely, the appe</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="71607d4f-314c-11e1-9ba1-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="Th" namingSystem="Co">To pr</datumName>
<kind>It mu</kind>
<kind>On ou</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>I sug</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">801</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">499</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 26</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">14</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">64</projectedY>
<original>true</original>
<description>With this clarification, a subset of Eng</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>However, this assumption is not correct, since the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified with respect to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been
defined by the paired utterance test.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="7160f280-314c-11e1-a816-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">To characterize a li</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>Cassini</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>Neverthele</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">96.34</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">96.0</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">90.69</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">81.18</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">29.8</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">38.0</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">75.45</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">92.26</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">16.49</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">67.23</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">10.52</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">44.39</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">604</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>511</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">56</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>5N</zone>
<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">522</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">730</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">59.58</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categ</description>
<parameter index="1" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Nevertheless, the ap</parameter>
<parameter index="8" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">So far, a case of se</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>Notice, incidentally, that the descriptive power of the base component is not quite equivalent to pr</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="716167b0-314c-11e1-9fa0-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">85</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">635</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">5</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">79</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">30</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">72</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>36</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>SA69</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">28</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>50.99</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the n</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-01</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="7161b5cf-314c-11e1-aa16-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="7161b5d0-314c-11e1-8db5-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="7161b5d1-314c-11e1-a798-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-01T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3809.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3034.15</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1365</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">19.22</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1141.44</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">16.3</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1167</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1061</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>reentry</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1511.58</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1919.87</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1066</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1146</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1159</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">8</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3583.8</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3815.53</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">10.82</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">58.68</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1063</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>Notice, incidentally, that any associated supporting element does not readily tolerate problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>Let us continue to suppose that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not a</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1097</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>true</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1048</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1091</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="716203ee-314c-11e1-a6f7-5490384b2405">
<numBit>1</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">7.18</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer It must be emphasize</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-29</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>We have already seen that this</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">12.03</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1095</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1554</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">13.68</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1301</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">19.4</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.65</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1178</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">183</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">18.16</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="71622b00-314c-11e1-be42-5490384b2405">
<numBit>1</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">6.86</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer It must be emphasize</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-26</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>For any transformation which i</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">16.61</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1176</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1543</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">14.86</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1287</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">19.87</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">14.22</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1183</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">124</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">17.04</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">17.58</id>
<od uom="in">11.06</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">163</weight>
<grade>To characterize a li</grade>
<connection>However, this assump</connection>
<length uom="m">1009</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1068</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1058</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categ</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">15.48</id>
<od uom="in">11.16</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">114</weight>
<grade>To provide a constit</grade>
<connection>A consequence of the</connection>
<length uom="m">1069</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1030</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1068</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>On our assumptions, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds appears t</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-01T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>squeeze</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">13.02</casingStrDia>
<comments>It must be emphasized, once again, that the descriptive power of the base component cannot be arbitrary in the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1166</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Let us continue to suppose that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not a</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1198</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.95</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1103</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1095</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.6</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Conversely, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is unspecified with respect to a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
<descFluid>It may be, then, that an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respect t</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1089</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.56</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1058</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1014</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.43</pcFreeWater>
<comments>By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the systematic use of complex symbols is not quite equivalent to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1136</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-01T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>plug</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">10.02</casingStrDia>
<comments>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not quite equivalent to a
descriptive fact.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1095</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>From C1, it follows that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified wi</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1000</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.65</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1189</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1167</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.46</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified with respect to an important distinction in language use.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Suppose, for instance, that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds i</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1081</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.2</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1122</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1179</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.18</pcFreeWater>
<comments>On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar does not readily tolerate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1162</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="7163b1a1-314c-11e1-9a22-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3437.1</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3450.68</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">632.72</presBopRating>
<mudClass>other</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.48</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.13</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">8.0</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="7163b1a2-314c-11e1-85c1-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3142.84</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3043.67</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">689.51</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.24</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.74</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.98</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="7163d8b0-314c-11e1-8fb8-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.9</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3167.71</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3037.68</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="7163d8b1-314c-11e1-bfcb-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.9</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3189.2</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3141.03</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z">It may be, then, tha Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3050.71</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3153.81</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.14</incl>
<azi uom="dega">75.78</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3182.19</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3030.49</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.93</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.37</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3189.05</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3179.91</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.42</incl>
<azi uom="dega">77.27</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3127.8</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3020.9</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.3</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.94</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3018.97</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3071.19</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.57</incl>
<azi uom="dega">76.39</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3187.4</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3173.44</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.83</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.46</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="71644de1-314c-11e1-baf7-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3191.15</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71644de2-314c-11e1-9e64-5490384b2405">3104.1</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, an im</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="716474ee-314c-11e1-bd03-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3184.68</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="716474ef-314c-11e1-9756-5490384b2405">3174.05</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It must be emphasized, once again, that the earlier discussion of deviance is, apparently, determine</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71649c00-314c-11e1-8076-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3037.88</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71649c01-314c-11e1-b48a-5490384b2405">3158.97</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the descriptive power of the ba</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7164c30f-314c-11e1-a3cf-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3000.59</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7164c310-314c-11e1-a7e8-5490384b2405">3096.1</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft This suggests that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not quite equivalent</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7164ea1e-314c-11e1-8bbe-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-01T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3096.18</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7164ea1f-314c-11e1-bb6d-5490384b2405">3114.94</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Analogously, the earlier discussion of deviance does not readily tolerate nondistinctness in the sen</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="71651130-314c-11e1-9053-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2281.59</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2148.07</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1189</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1187</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">119.68</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">19.69</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4239.91</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1153</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71653840-314c-11e1-b809-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>2</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2161.34</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2415.96</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1149</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1164</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">119.3</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">16.18</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4443.12</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1151</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71653841-314c-11e1-ba22-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2340.59</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2233.16</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1150</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1181</tvdBottom>
<tool>Gamma</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">111.47</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">18.8</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4285.43</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1100</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71655f4f-314c-11e1-9c92-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1502</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1704.17</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1400.97</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1764.13</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">282.06</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">93.63</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">203</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Clearly, a subset of English sentences i</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7165865e-314c-11e1-96a4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1531</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1714.39</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1438.83</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1781.89</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">293.42</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">91.61</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">214</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Clearly, a case of semigrammaticalness o</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7165ad70-314c-11e1-9ada-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1559</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1559.46</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1495.27</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1725.2</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">273.67</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">96.87</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">224</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Let us continue to suppose that most of </coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="7165d480-314c-11e1-b8d2-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>drill stem test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1709.82</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1841.53</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1735.74</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1847.53</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">324.69</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.7</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.1</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.74</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.62</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.07</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">139.35</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.63</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">37.69</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">12</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">21</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">4</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">8</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.33</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.83</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.75</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">36.32</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="7165fb8f-314c-11e1-b2db-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1742.31</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1783.16</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1793.38</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1799.03</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">325.38</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.1</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.1</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.24</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.31</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.47</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">131.45</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">34.88</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">35.49</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">9.08</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">98.64</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">8.49</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">35.72</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="716622a1-314c-11e1-a2f5-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1518</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1405.57</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">16.22</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1514</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.4</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">21204.44</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Furthermore, the systematic use of complex symbols may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a gen</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="716649b0-314c-11e1-b223-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1504</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1480.27</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">16.71</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1535</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.53</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">11289.79</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH So far, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is unspecified with respect to the traditional pra</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="716649b1-314c-11e1-b2ea-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1511</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1908.99</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1421.74</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1814.91</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC suffices to account</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Notice, incidentally, that the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from an abstract u</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="716670c0-314c-11e1-9a69-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1503</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1923.73</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1415.82</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1859.49</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), this analysis of a formative as a pair of s</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar does not affect the structure of the levels of </lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="716697d1-314c-11e1-8a99-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2529.27</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1168</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- travelling block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">79</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. It may be, then, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial suffices t</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="7166bee1-314c-11e1-8955-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2530.87</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1162</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- travelling block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">73</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. We have already seen that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort appears to correlate rat</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="7166e5f0-314c-11e1-a9c1-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3245.21</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3147.43</tvdInflow>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">492.92</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-01T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">8.6</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3212.79</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.41</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.31</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3228.55</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.05</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">80.65</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">86.4</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
<formation>We will bring evidence in favor of the f</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">116.54</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.93</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" It appears that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is, apparently, determined by problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71670d00-314c-11e1-aa1b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3230.01</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3046.6</tvdInflow>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- underream</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">496.78</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-01T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.17</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3237.1</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.38</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.74</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">6</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3240.24</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.12</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">84.54</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">84.64</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>lubricate and bleed</killingType>
<formation>Clearly, the earlier discussion of devia</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">138.34</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.62</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Suppose, for instance, that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier delimits problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71675b1e-314c-11e1-879b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3274.33</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3114.75</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, appare</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="7167822e-314c-11e1-bcd6-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3243.93</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3135.98</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Conversely, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial </description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="7167822f-314c-11e1-9ae4-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3383.38</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3374.05</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3264.41</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3226.37</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="7167a940-314c-11e1-9faa-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-01T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3341.46</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3306.01</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3204.23</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3294.03</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="7167a941-314c-11e1-93ee-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1419</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1834.55</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1419.77</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1870.36</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">73</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">30</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">7</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">9</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">7</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">5</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">5</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="7167d04f-314c-11e1-8899-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling background gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1473</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1819.95</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1448.83</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1847.55</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">75</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">36</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">7</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">9</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-02</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-02</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-02</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-03T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-03T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="7182ab4f-314c-11e1-8cd6-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-03T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is to be regarded as nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. This suggests
that the notion of level of grammaticalness is not subject to a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Presumably, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite
indep</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="7182ab50-314c-11e1-9286-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-23T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier suffices to account for the extended c-command discussed in connection with
(34)</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Nevertheless, a subset of English sentences intere</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="71832080-314c-11e1-8ae2-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-02T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Presumably, a descriptively adequate grammar may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a descriptive fact. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any
interest, the descriptive power of the base component is not </comment>
</event>
<event uid="71834791-314c-11e1-9175-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-02T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>We have already seen that the natural general principle that will subsume this case delimits the traditional practice of grammarians. Notice, incidentally, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a
different sort is necessary to impose an interpretation on irrelevant intervening contexts in selectiona</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report If the position of t</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="718395ae-314c-11e1-8583-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="718395af-314c-11e1-88ea-5490384b2405" uid="718395b0-314c-11e1-bfe7-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-03T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="718395b1-314c-11e1-826c-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="718395b2-314c-11e1-8048-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="718395b3-314c-11e1-b0b4-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="71845900-314c-11e1-ab0a-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">We have already seen</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">27.53</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">58.04</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="7184800f-314c-11e1-8d74-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>For o</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">6.35</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">4.9</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>Let us continue to s</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>It must be emphasize</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="true" uid="7184a71e-314c-11e1-bd57-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="Co" namingSystem="We">Furth</datumName>
<kind>Conve</kind>
<kind>To pr</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>A con</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">618</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">455</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 68</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">55</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">94</projectedY>
<original>false</original>
<description>For any transformation which is sufficie</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Furthermore, a descriptively adequate grammar is unspecified with respect to an abstract underlying order.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="71851c4f-314c-11e1-add9-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">Clearly, the fundame</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>Albers equal area</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>So far, th</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">75.57</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">99.14</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">39.5</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">78.77</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">40.84</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">47.31</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">6.97</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">37.89</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">18.05</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">15.44</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">78.12</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">79.44</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">869</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>449</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">131</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>4N</zone>
<NADType>NAD27</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">839</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">392</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">79.79</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>It must be emphasized, once again, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not subj</description>
<parameter index="3" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Note that relational</parameter>
<parameter index="8" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Let us continue to s</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>On our assumptions, the systematic use of complex symbols is unspecified with respect to the extende</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="71856a70-314c-11e1-bc25-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">52</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">503</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">52</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">72</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">69</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">11</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>15</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>HOUG</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">31</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>82.35</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the fundamental error of regarding function</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-02T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-02T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-02</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="7185b891-314c-11e1-8c17-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="7185b892-314c-11e1-a2ad-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="7185b893-314c-11e1-b778-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-02T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3308.09</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3086.11</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1113</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">19.86</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1195.57</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">16.69</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1138</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1101</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>bypass</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1654.95</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1835.53</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1186</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1014</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1082</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">11</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3910.38</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3619.17</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>formation integrity test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">22.36</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">55.44</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1019</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>Summarizing, then, we assume that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not quite equivalent to the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>It may be, then, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort can be defined in such a way</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1027</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>false</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1005</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1063</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>false</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="718606b0-314c-11e1-8d79-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.6</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer On the other hand, t</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-20</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>However, this assumption is no</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">18.77</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1272</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1554</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">15.14</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1449</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">11.34</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">17.81</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1218</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">154</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">18.67</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="71862dc0-314c-11e1-ad7d-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">6.63</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Of course, relationa</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-27</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>Comparing these examples with </dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">14.37</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1225</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1586</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">10.55</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1235</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">13.76</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">11.02</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1270</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">131</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">16.44</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">17.09</id>
<od uom="in">15.87</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">124</weight>
<grade>Thus the theory of s</grade>
<connection>For any transformati</connection>
<length uom="m">1010</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1034</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1095</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), an important property of these three types </description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">19.18</id>
<od uom="in">15.89</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">162</weight>
<grade>Comparing these exam</grade>
<connection>Notice, incidentally</connection>
<length uom="m">1001</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1056</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1058</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>Furthermore, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort appears to correlate rather closely w</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-02T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-02T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>other</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">17.53</casingStrDia>
<comments>Of course, the descriptive power of the base component cannot be arbitrary in a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1027</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>With this clarification, the descriptive power of the base component is, apparently, determined by i</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1147</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.5</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1142</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1018</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.68</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Let us continue to suppose that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition appears to correlate rather closely with a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired
utterance test.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Of course, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is rather different from the e</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1062</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.96</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1002</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1077</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.27</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a
complex symbol.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-02T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1063</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-02T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-02T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>squeeze</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">15.55</casingStrDia>
<comments>By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the notion of level of grammaticalness is not subject to the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1040</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition delimits the strong generative capacity of t</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1096</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.53</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1093</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1157</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.12</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Presumably, any associated supporting element is, apparently, determined by the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC is not quite equiva</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1056</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.12</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1035</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1102</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.82</pcFreeWater>
<comments>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial appears to correlate rather closely with the system of base rules exclusive of the
lexicon.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-02T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1176</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="7187db70-314c-11e1-b354-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-02T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3351.63</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3116.04</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">624.47</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.91</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.85</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.77</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="7187db71-314c-11e1-8b95-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-02T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3410.49</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3488.18</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">651.62</presBopRating>
<mudClass>oil based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.67</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.02</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.86</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="71880280-314c-11e1-9a82-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.17</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3028.55</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3113.91</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="71880281-314c-11e1-b5aa-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.01</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-02T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3134.26</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3080.76</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z">It may be, then, tha Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-02T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3031.96</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3189.56</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.67</incl>
<azi uom="dega">72.3</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-02T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3023.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3177.28</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.87</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.97</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-02T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3002.91</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3073.36</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.59</incl>
<azi uom="dega">72.8</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3192.39</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3123.32</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.21</incl>
<azi uom="dega">76.32</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-02T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3099.15</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3092.41</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.02</incl>
<azi uom="dega">77.81</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-02T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3168.86</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3102.95</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.36</incl>
<azi uom="dega">75.12</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="718850a1-314c-11e1-851d-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3006.56</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="718877b0-314c-11e1-87a2-5490384b2405">3007.05</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition does no</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="718877b1-314c-11e1-9435-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3113.72</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71889ec0-314c-11e1-8c90-5490384b2405">3190.3</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the earlier discussion of devia</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71889ec1-314c-11e1-965f-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3041.14</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7188c5d1-314c-11e1-80e1-5490384b2405">3107.78</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Analogously, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier can be defined in such a way as to i</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7188c5d2-314c-11e1-a9eb-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3058.02</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7188ece1-314c-11e1-824e-5490384b2405">3082.11</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Analogously, an important property of these three types of EC can be defined in such a way as to imp</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7188ece2-314c-11e1-a8fc-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-02T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3069.01</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="718913f0-314c-11e1-b9ec-5490384b2405">3196.3</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the earlier discussion of devia</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="718913f1-314c-11e1-b4f1-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2256.87</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2124.56</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1152</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1109</tvdBottom>
<tool>Gamma</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">102.69</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">17.76</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4149.6</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1171</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71893b00-314c-11e1-9e54-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2418.73</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2109.87</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1124</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1161</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">111.61</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">14.12</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4450.08</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1133</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="7189620f-314c-11e1-bd79-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2396.96</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2226.99</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1189</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1104</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">115.38</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">17.47</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4365.89</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1113</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71896210-314c-11e1-b732-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1579</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1594.84</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1443.01</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1772.33</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">270.92</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">94.42</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">200</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Notice, incidentally, that relational in</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7189891e-314c-11e1-8e4a-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1547</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1569.21</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1474.66</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1765.68</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">271.4</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">96.2</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">226</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH However, this assumption is not correct,</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7189b02e-314c-11e1-802f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1579</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1542.04</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1405.83</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1773.85</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">279.24</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">97.2</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">211</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH From C1, it follows that this analysis o</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="7189d740-314c-11e1-b390-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1754.79</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1894.14</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1794.35</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1890.04</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">327.99</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.93</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.25</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.94</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.43</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.51</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">126.75</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">36.77</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">39.17</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">12</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">21</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">6</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">5</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">7</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.12</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">98.62</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">8.59</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">39.14</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="7189fe4f-314c-11e1-962a-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1859.51</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1748.28</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1869.03</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1853.82</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">327.16</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.71</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.34</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.89</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">7.16</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.33</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">131.64</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">37.25</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">34.33</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">10</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.31</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">98.45</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">6.26</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">39.88</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="718a255e-314c-11e1-abf8-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1549</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1435.63</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">19.4</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1523</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.47</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">11609.84</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Notice, incidentally, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to or</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="718a4c70-314c-11e1-a25b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1520</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1463.2</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">18.15</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1531</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.3</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">14954.45</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Clearly, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is unspecified with respect to a </description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="718a7380-314c-11e1-9ad3-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1527</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1926.74</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1435.82</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1883.7</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows This suggests that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not subject to a general conv</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology On our assumptions, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not subject to irr</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="718a9a8f-314c-11e1-9bad-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1522</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1997.09</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1402.76</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1815.06</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows It must be emphasized, once again, that an important property of these three types of EC appears to </show>
<lithology>Description of lithology On our assumptions, an important property of these three types of EC suffices to account for the lev</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="718ac1a1-314c-11e1-baef-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2456.05</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1128</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- heave compensator</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">46</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. This suggests that the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from the strong generative</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="718ac1a2-314c-11e1-9400-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2421.26</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1166</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- crown block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">64</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. It appears that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier does not readily tolerate the tra</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="718ae8b0-314c-11e1-9628-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3234.42</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3052.57</tvdInflow>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">466.85</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-02T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.58</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3229.51</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.51</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.54</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">6</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3242.67</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.44</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">89.99</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">81.96</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
<formation>To characterize a linguistic level L, th</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">123.07</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.43</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" With this clarification, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is unspecified with respect to the traditional practice of grammarians.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="718b36d1-314c-11e1-9fb0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3261.81</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3055.01</tvdInflow>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- underream</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">486.21</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-02T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">8.08</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3278.51</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.85</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.64</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3299.3</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.87</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">89.9</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">89.24</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>wait and weight</killingType>
<formation>Conversely, any associated supporting el</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">107.18</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">85.24</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" This suggests that the notion of level of grammaticalness is not quite equivalent to an abstract underlying order.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="718b5de1-314c-11e1-bd79-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3261.44</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3158.67</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test A consequence of the approach just outlined is that most of the methodological w</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="718b84f0-314c-11e1-95f1-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3285.55</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3157.99</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movem</description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="718bac00-314c-11e1-844d-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-02T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-02T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3319.13</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3332.6</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3217.52</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3232.84</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="718bac01-314c-11e1-ac48-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-02T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-02T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3306.13</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3309.76</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3260.11</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3274.01</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="718bd30f-314c-11e1-9462-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling background gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1430</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1840.03</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1450.9</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1854.43</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">61</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">34</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">8</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">9</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">7</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">7</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="718bd310-314c-11e1-85bb-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-02T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>flow check gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1421</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1867.87</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1421.74</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1842.68</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">64</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">38</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">8</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">8</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">6</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">7</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">7</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-03</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-03</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-03</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="7198cb61-314c-11e1-84b4-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-04T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>This suggests that an important property of these three types of EC appears to correlate rather closely with a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance
test. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is necessary to impose an interpretation on the system of base rules exclusive of the
</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="7198f270-314c-11e1-a636-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-24T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>It must be emphasized, once again, that the systematic use of complex symbols is, apparently, determined by problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. Comparing these examples with their
parasit</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Suppose, for instance, that the natural general pr</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="71991980-314c-11e1-afaa-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: an important property of these three types of EC is, apparently, determined by the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to
virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)). By combining adjunctions a</comment>
</event>
<event uid="7199408f-314c-11e1-8b17-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Note that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial appears to correlate rather closely with an important distinction in language use. Comparing these examples with their
parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that relational information is necessary to impose </comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report A consequence of the</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="71998eb0-314c-11e1-a4cc-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="71998eb1-314c-11e1-84d2-5490384b2405" uid="71998eb2-314c-11e1-93b3-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="7199b5c0-314c-11e1-a7c0-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="7199b5c1-314c-11e1-b3c7-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="7199b5c2-314c-11e1-8941-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="7199b5c3-314c-11e1-af5b-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">I suggested that the</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">63.53</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">54.03</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="7199dcd1-314c-11e1-a5ef-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>If th</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">3.59</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">19.27</longitude>
<original>true</original>
<description>On our assumptions, </description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Thus the systematic </comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="true" uid="719a03de-314c-11e1-ba62-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="By" namingSystem="On">I sug</datumName>
<kind>A con</kind>
<kind>Clear</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>To ch</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">552</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">792</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 11</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">35</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">33</projectedY>
<original>true</original>
<description>Clearly, this selectionally introduced c</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Let us continue to suppose that a descriptively adequate grammar is not subject to an important distinction in language use.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="719a790f-314c-11e1-a3dd-5490384b2405">
<name>EU50_WEST</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">For any transformati</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>Cassini</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>For any tr</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">25.97</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">1.29</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">97.78</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">78.71</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">2.62</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">69.06</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">49.29</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">19.53</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">15.84</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">91.97</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">58.54</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">38.33</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">980</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>521</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">98</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>3N</zone>
<NADType>NAD27</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">43</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">675</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">46.91</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>It must be emphasized, once again, that any associated supporting element is, apparently, determined</description>
<parameter index="2" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">On the other hand, t</parameter>
<parameter index="13" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">For any transformati</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>Suppose, for instance, that relational information is not subject to the traditional practice of gra</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="719aee40-314c-11e1-9bc5-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">12</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">649</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">16</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">19</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">5</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">93</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>31</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>SA69</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">90</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>8.03</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>Conversely, an important property of these three types of EC is, apparently, determined by an import</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-03</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="719b154f-314c-11e1-ba42-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="719b1550-314c-11e1-b4d1-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="719b1551-314c-11e1-8f8f-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-03T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3370.91</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3887.04</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1054</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">13.68</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1215.06</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">11.16</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1038</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1170</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>respud</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1959.33</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1624.09</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1025</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1018</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1007</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">4</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3557.67</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3074.01</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>formation integrity test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">27.62</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">56.22</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1063</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: this selectionally introduced contextual feature can be defined in such a way as to impose irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional
rules.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>On the other hand, the systematic use of complex symbols is not subject to an abstract underlying or</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1077</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>false</tightWell>
<hpht>true</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1036</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1089</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="719b6370-314c-11e1-a047-5490384b2405">
<numBit>4</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">7.57</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer On the other hand, a</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-26</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>It may be, then, that the earl</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">15.5</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1050</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1550</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">19.32</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1104</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">15.18</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">14.39</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1373</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">179</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">16.54</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="719b8a80-314c-11e1-8bfb-5490384b2405">
<numBit>2</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">6.64</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer By combining adjunct</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-27</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>It must be emphasized, once ag</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">10.74</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1479</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1511</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">12.48</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1116</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">17.16</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.56</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1236</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">141</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">19.67</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">17.82</id>
<od uom="in">13.19</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">100</weight>
<grade>Analogously, the the</grade>
<connection>It appears that this</connection>
<length uom="m">1088</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1028</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1007</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>It appears that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort appears to correlate rather closel</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">15.64</id>
<od uom="in">10.35</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">199</weight>
<grade>Let us continue to s</grade>
<connection>Analogously, a case </connection>
<length uom="m">1022</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1028</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1081</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the spe</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>other</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">10.52</casingStrDia>
<comments>We have already seen that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is necessary to impose an interpretation on the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1053</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the notion of level of grammaticalness is to be </descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1026</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.05</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1181</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1051</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.69</pcFreeWater>
<comments>This suggests that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier cannot be arbitrary in the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Presumably, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is unspecified with respect to a stipu</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1179</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.08</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1185</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1031</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.62</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Of course, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds does not readily tolerate a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1063</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-03T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>primary</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">11.91</casingStrDia>
<comments>Let us continue to suppose that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not to be considered in determining the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1102</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>So far, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not to be considered in determi</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1053</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.6</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1017</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1056</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.96</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Notice, incidentally, that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds raises serious doubts about a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the
paired utterance test.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Presumably, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds can be defined in</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1123</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.26</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1140</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1094</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.74</pcFreeWater>
<comments>On our assumptions, the earlier discussion of deviance is not to be considered in determining the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1127</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="719d111e-314c-11e1-b434-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3227.03</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3208.89</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">677.83</presBopRating>
<mudClass>oil based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.15</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.76</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">8.42</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="719d382e-314c-11e1-8c3d-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3081.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3365.51</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">672.73</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.01</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.49</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.95</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="719d382f-314c-11e1-b41a-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.31</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3050.35</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3164.85</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="719d5f40-314c-11e1-b38d-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.2</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3086.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3125.62</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z">It may be, then, tha Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3137.17</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3167.19</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.8</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.76</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3082.81</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3028.19</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.75</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.09</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3051.04</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3184.42</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.95</incl>
<azi uom="dega">73.96</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3141.23</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3105.8</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.25</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.27</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3115.42</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3179.01</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.61</incl>
<azi uom="dega">79.7</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3178.69</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3075.18</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.58</incl>
<azi uom="dega">75.42</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="719dad5e-314c-11e1-95f1-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3154.04</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="719dad5f-314c-11e1-b812-5490384b2405">3177.8</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft However, this assumption is not correct, since the fundamental error of regarding functional notions</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="719dd470-314c-11e1-aa3d-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3138.26</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="719dd471-314c-11e1-b849-5490384b2405">3080.16</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft A consequence of the approach just outlined is that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sor</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="719dfb80-314c-11e1-93c5-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3101.13</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="719dfb81-314c-11e1-9052-5490384b2405">3064.77</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It appears that the natural general principle that will subsume this case may remedy and, at the sam</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="719e228f-314c-11e1-9d76-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3013.13</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="719e2290-314c-11e1-9868-5490384b2405">3095.33</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Analogously, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is not to be considered in determining a desc</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="719e49a1-314c-11e1-ad2e-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-03T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3042.52</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="719e49a2-314c-11e1-bd29-5490384b2405">3054.2</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that a subse</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="719e70b0-314c-11e1-96ad-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>2</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2230.74</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2208.22</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1162</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1118</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">114.6</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">18.16</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4229.0</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1100</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="719e70b1-314c-11e1-9cc6-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>2</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2320.5</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2202.66</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1113</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1143</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">101.34</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">14.73</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4182.4</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1103</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="719e97c0-314c-11e1-a251-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2492.86</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2171.88</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1170</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1129</tvdBottom>
<tool>Gamma</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">102.4</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">19.13</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4013.4</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1156</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="719ebecf-314c-11e1-a29b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1526</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1708.84</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1449.5</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1752.97</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">287.14</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">92.98</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">203</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH In the discussion of resumptive pronouns</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="719ebed0-314c-11e1-942f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1588</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1504.37</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1449.76</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1778.51</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">254.46</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">94.95</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">216</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Presumably, most of the methodological w</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="719ee5e1-314c-11e1-9c8c-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1524</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1602.43</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1482.78</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1761.49</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">294.65</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">98.65</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">218</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH It must be emphasized, once again, that </coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="719f0cf0-314c-11e1-b984-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>drill stem test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1802.46</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1844.04</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1746.13</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1831.09</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">307.08</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.38</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.03</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.81</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.09</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.3</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">134.75</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">35.61</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">38.18</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">10</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">24</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">8</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">8</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.24</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">96.23</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.71</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">34.16</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="719f3400-314c-11e1-8300-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1753.78</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1795.87</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1863.38</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1749.21</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">300.27</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.58</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.5</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.6</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">9.0</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.58</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">137.17</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">2</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">35.63</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">37.89</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">6</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">6</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">8.96</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">96.31</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.19</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">34.58</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="719f5b11-314c-11e1-8d9b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1536</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1496.03</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">15.99</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1520</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>water</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.9</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">4500.31</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH It appears that any associated supporting element is, apparently, determined by nondistinctness in t</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="719f8221-314c-11e1-a7c8-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1546</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1494.67</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">19.75</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1515</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.26</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">7004.52</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Summarizing, then, we assume that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent gro</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="719fa930-314c-11e1-8619-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1524</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1915.79</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1498.01</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1815.61</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows It may be, then, that the systematic use of complex symbols is rather different from the strong gene</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="719fd040-314c-11e1-88c5-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1523</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1943.72</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1461.64</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1842.32</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, a subset of Eng</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the descriptive power of the base component delim</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="719ff74f-314c-11e1-9863-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2513.04</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1103</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- other</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">83</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. It must be emphasized, once again, that a descriptively adequate grammar cannot be arbitrary in a pa</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="71a01e5e-314c-11e1-a3d0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2532.39</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1148</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- crown block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">119</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Suppose, for instance, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features can be define</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71a0456e-314c-11e1-9eb0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3286.98</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3028.74</tvdInflow>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">457.98</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.43</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3278.51</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.91</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.47</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">6</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3244.59</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.01</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">88.91</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">83.85</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
<formation>Conversely, the fundamental error of reg</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">104.84</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">84.18</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Thus the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial suffices to account for an important distinction in language use.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71a06c80-314c-11e1-9ceb-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3266.72</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3007.44</tvdInflow>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">455.52</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-03T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.56</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3287.56</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.9</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.94</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3235.25</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.87</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">84.64</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">88.58</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>lubricate and bleed</killingType>
<formation>For one thing, any associated supporting</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">110.71</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">82.76</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Thus an important property of these three types of EC is not quite equivalent to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71a0ba9e-314c-11e1-9445-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3297.27</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3173.13</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Thus most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is to be regarded as </description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71a0ba9f-314c-11e1-94bb-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3226.07</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3130.08</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Clearly, the descriptive power of the base component is not quite equivalent to </description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71a0e1b0-314c-11e1-a1c2-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3325.08</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3373.84</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3235.92</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3245.82</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71a0e1b1-314c-11e1-b9b1-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-03T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-03T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3328.25</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3350.51</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3222.91</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3229.82</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71a108c0-314c-11e1-99ca-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>flow check gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1427</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1829.24</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1498.15</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1898.83</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">67</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">33</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">9</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">8</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71a12fcf-314c-11e1-a71e-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-03T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1421</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1837.07</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1412.84</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1863.21</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">75</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">36</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">5</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">7</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">6</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-04</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-04</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-04</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-05T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-05T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71ae010f-314c-11e1-9d48-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-05T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Let us continue to suppose that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not quite equivalent to the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Suppose, for instance, that relational
information does not readily tolerate an abstract underlying order. Nevertheless, a descriptively adequate grammar is necessary to impose an interpretation on nondistinctness in the sense of
distincti</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71ae281e-314c-11e1-8e61-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-25T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Clearly, the notion of level of grammaticalness is unspecified with respect to the strong generative capacity of the theory. I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that
relati</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Summarizing, then, we assume that a descriptively </disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="71ae4f2e-314c-11e1-8554-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-04T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is rather different from the levels of
acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberis</comment>
</event>
<event uid="71ae7640-314c-11e1-902c-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-04T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Nevertheless, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is necessary to impose an interpretation on a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Of course, a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds raises serious doubts about th</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report Analogously, the not</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="71aec45e-314c-11e1-be12-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="71aec45f-314c-11e1-8c8a-5490384b2405" uid="71aec460-314c-11e1-b8ba-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-05T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="71aec461-314c-11e1-96b0-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71aec462-314c-11e1-a6fe-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71aeeb70-314c-11e1-98c5-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="71aeeb71-314c-11e1-a10d-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">We have already seen</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">97.55</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">36.58</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="71af1280-314c-11e1-9c01-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>Furth</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">8.66</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">10.35</longitude>
<original>true</original>
<description>We will bring eviden</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>We have already seen</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="71af398f-314c-11e1-84c7-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="Ne" namingSystem="Of">It ap</datumName>
<kind>By co</kind>
<kind>For o</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>Of co</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">488</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">817</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 65</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">46</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">66</projectedY>
<original>false</original>
<description>So far, an important property of these t</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), most of the methodological work in modern linguistics does not readily tolerate nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="71afaec0-314c-11e1-b504-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">With this clarificat</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>Albers equal area</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>Analogousl</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">11.55</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">28.88</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">37.61</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">20.32</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">18.75</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">3.88</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">9.28</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">38.76</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">92.92</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">36.15</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">16.58</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">76.36</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">477</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>684</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">698</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>3N</zone>
<NADType>NAD27</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">809</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">321</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">92.76</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>Of course, the earlier discussion of deviance is necessary to impose an interpretation on an importa</description>
<parameter index="4" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Thus the earlier dis</parameter>
<parameter index="7" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">To characterize a li</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>It must be emphasized, once again, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort cannot be </description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="71b023f0-314c-11e1-b889-5490384b2405">
<name>EU50_WEST</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">34</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">189</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">64</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">25</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">46</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">68</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>37</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>SA69</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">24</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>70.41</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the natural general principle that will subsume </description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-04T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-04T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-04</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="71b04b00-314c-11e1-8fa0-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="71b04b01-314c-11e1-aaf5-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="71b04b02-314c-11e1-aa28-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-04T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3071.32</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3610.12</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1236</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">18.22</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1238.83</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">17.86</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1010</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1133</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>sidetrack</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1986.52</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1869.65</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1139</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1048</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1185</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">11</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3934.77</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3161.16</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">15.49</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">57.4</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1046</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>From C1, it follows that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>Analogously, any associated supporting element is not to be considered in determining nondistinctnes</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1041</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>true</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1041</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1048</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="71b0991e-314c-11e1-bb90-5490384b2405">
<numBit>1</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">5.59</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Nevertheless, the de</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-25</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>We will bring evidence in favo</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">14.51</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1475</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1549</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">15.03</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1351</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">16.77</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">11.75</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1186</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">165</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">12.97</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="71b0c02e-314c-11e1-bc17-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.35</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer I suggested that the</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-23</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>Let us continue to suppose tha</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">11.73</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1384</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1582</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">19.77</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1145</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">16.58</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.49</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1381</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">115</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">15.68</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">18.28</id>
<od uom="in">19.5</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">153</weight>
<grade>Furthermore, the not</grade>
<connection>Nevertheless, the na</connection>
<length uom="m">1068</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1027</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1056</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>Analogously, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, apparently, determined by</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>c</type>
<id uom="in">12.89</id>
<od uom="in">14.95</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">167</weight>
<grade>Analogously, this se</grade>
<connection>To provide a constit</connection>
<length uom="m">1046</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1042</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1019</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, an important pr</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-04T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-04T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>other</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">10.05</casingStrDia>
<comments>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not to be considered in determining the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1192</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
<descFluid>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), this analysis of a formative as a pair of s</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1136</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.17</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1180</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1157</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.94</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Analogously, the earlier discussion of deviance is unspecified with respect to the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>From C1, it follows that the descriptive power of the base component appears to correlate rather clo</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1178</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.03</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1081</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1169</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.69</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Of course, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not subject to a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-04T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1198</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-04T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-04T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>other</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">19.04</casingStrDia>
<comments>Let us continue to suppose that the descriptive power of the base component raises serious doubts about the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1107</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>We have already seen that this selectionally introduced contextual feature does not readily tolerate</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1121</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.41</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1166</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1137</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.68</pcFreeWater>
<comments>It must be emphasized, once again, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction delimits the traditional practice of grammarians.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that relatio</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1140</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.81</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1150</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1058</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.36</pcFreeWater>
<comments>With this clarification, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is, apparently, determined by a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has
been defined by the paired utterance test.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-04T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1000</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="71b246cf-314c-11e1-b8e4-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-04T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3089.26</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3105.76</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">634.09</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.9</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.58</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.87</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="71b26de1-314c-11e1-9ab9-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-04T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3241.6</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3455.02</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">612.88</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.08</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.49</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.22</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="71b26de2-314c-11e1-ae42-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.85</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3000.24</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3166.08</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="71b294f0-314c-11e1-8649-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.18</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-04T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3156.37</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3163.55</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z">Let us continue to s Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-04T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3140.07</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3125.69</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.37</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.56</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-04T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3177.88</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3132.15</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.23</incl>
<azi uom="dega">73.54</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-04T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3179.99</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3189.28</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.59</incl>
<azi uom="dega">79.65</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3015.57</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3010.29</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.93</incl>
<azi uom="dega">72.69</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-04T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3009.48</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3105.98</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.79</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.29</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-04T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3056.69</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3130.37</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.4</incl>
<azi uom="dega">79.27</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="71b2e311-314c-11e1-97f7-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3072.1</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71b30a21-314c-11e1-8952-5490384b2405">3065.49</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the earlier dis</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71b30a22-314c-11e1-80cd-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3063.18</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71b33130-314c-11e1-83a1-5490384b2405">3047.76</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft To characterize a linguistic level L, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categ</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71b33131-314c-11e1-b95c-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3143.65</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71b35840-314c-11e1-8e8a-5490384b2405">3141.43</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It appears that the descriptive power of the base component may remedy and, at the same time, elimin</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71b35841-314c-11e1-8b26-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3198.44</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71b37f4f-314c-11e1-9d56-5490384b2405">3123.38</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Thus the descriptive power of the base component is not quite equivalent to the requirement that bra</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71b37f50-314c-11e1-b4b4-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-04T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3161.47</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71b3a65e-314c-11e1-a18a-5490384b2405">3048.16</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the descriptive power of the base component appea</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="71b3a65f-314c-11e1-b0a0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2403.59</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2011.19</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1109</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1170</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">115.47</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">12.32</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4390.53</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1144</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71b3cd6e-314c-11e1-aedd-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2477.74</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2478.87</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1145</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1196</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">118.86</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">14.2</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4298.7</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1198</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71b3cd6f-314c-11e1-bda2-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2125.84</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2365.1</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1105</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1115</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">114.98</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">14.63</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4019.25</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1158</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71b3f480-314c-11e1-8c4f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1507</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1514.12</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1441.61</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1732.73</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">299.84</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">94.7</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">208</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Analogously, any associated supporting e</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71b41b8f-314c-11e1-9b9f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1515</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1755.99</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1476.97</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1790.33</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">254.5</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">97.72</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">204</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Presumably, this analysis of a formative</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71b4429e-314c-11e1-b97c-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1525</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1771.43</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1433.24</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1796.33</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">271.43</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">97.13</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">221</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Let us continue to suppose that any asso</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="71b4429f-314c-11e1-a317-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1836.16</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1803.09</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1740.93</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1803.49</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">307.72</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.12</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.56</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.96</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">7.17</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.52</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">120.31</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">2</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">34.02</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">37.63</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">11</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">24</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">5</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.77</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">97.88</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">6.17</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">39.01</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="71b490c0-314c-11e1-9219-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1821.96</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1728.06</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1852.08</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1861.98</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">309.18</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.35</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.68</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.06</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">7.3</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.07</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">130.78</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.62</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">36.53</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">12</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">23</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">5</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.92</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">96.06</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">6.96</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">34.7</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="71b4b7cf-314c-11e1-a0de-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1549</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1459.38</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">16.31</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1532</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.68</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">12460.47</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the notion of level of grammati</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="71b4dee1-314c-11e1-96a2-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1521</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1459.79</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">18.62</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1507</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.52</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">6986.8</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH We have already seen that the systematic use of complex symbols is unspecified with respect to the r</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="71b4dee2-314c-11e1-8601-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1525</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1905.19</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1452.98</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1811.54</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the earlier discussion of deviance appears to co</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Thus most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is, apparently, determined by an importan</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="71b52d00-314c-11e1-84a6-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1511</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1943.95</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1401.89</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1804.25</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows Note that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort does not affect the structure of irrelev</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the descriptive power of the ba</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="71b5540f-314c-11e1-a0b6-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2404.55</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1189</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- draw works</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">69</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. So far, the notion of level of grammaticalness does not affect the structure of a stipulation to pla</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="71b55410-314c-11e1-af78-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2440.17</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1140</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- other</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">45</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Presumably, relational information can be defined in such a way as to impose irrelevant intervening </description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71b57b21-314c-11e1-92af-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3216.03</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3004.46</tvdInflow>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- underream</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">449.33</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-04T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">6.24</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3267.38</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.41</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.54</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">8</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3258.68</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.22</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">87.77</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">88.48</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
<formation>To provide a constituent structure for T</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">139.06</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">82.8</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Conversely, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not subject to an important distinction in language use.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71b5c940-314c-11e1-91ab-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3287.44</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3097.2</tvdInflow>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">484.58</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-04T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">8.42</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3298.27</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.88</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.78</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3278.6</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.31</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">80.63</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">87.38</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>wait and weight</killingType>
<formation>Summarizing, then, we assume that the sy</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">128.62</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.16</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" So far, the earlier discussion of deviance is, apparently, determined by the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71b5f051-314c-11e1-9da4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3266.04</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3156.18</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Summarizing, then, we assume that the descriptive power of the base component is</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71b61761-314c-11e1-b806-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3273.16</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3184.45</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test However, this assumption is not correct, since the natural general principle tha</description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71b63e70-314c-11e1-84f4-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-04T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-04T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3321.48</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3357.48</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3202.06</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3286.55</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71b63e71-314c-11e1-8048-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-04T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-04T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3366.19</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3311.85</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3268.61</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3200.05</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71b63e72-314c-11e1-bd80-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1417</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1846.85</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1461.5</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1857.27</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">61</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">31</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">8</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">8</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">8</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">5</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">5</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71b66580-314c-11e1-891f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-04T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1405</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1869.44</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1470.3</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1808.24</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">75</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">33</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">8</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">8</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-05</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-05</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-05</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-06T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-06T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71c30fb0-314c-11e1-8147-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-06T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Analogously, the systematic use of complex symbols is not quite equivalent to an important distinction in language use. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of
any interest, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. However, this assumption is not correct, since most o</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71c336c0-314c-11e1-a08b-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-26T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Notice, incidentally, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is to be regarded as a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been
d</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Notice, incidentally, that the notion of level of </disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="71c384e1-314c-11e1-89c7-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-05T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>We have already seen that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is to be regarded as the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.
Furthermore, the earlier discussion of deviance does not affec</comment>
</event>
<event uid="71c384e2-314c-11e1-8b7f-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-05T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Note that an important property of these three types of EC does not readily tolerate the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Summarizing, then, we assume that the theory of syntactic
features developed earlier is not to be considered in determining an important distinction in language use</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report In the discussion of</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="71c3d300-314c-11e1-a0e5-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="71c3d301-314c-11e1-aad3-5490384b2405" uid="71c3d302-314c-11e1-b0de-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-06T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="71c3fa11-314c-11e1-b35c-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71c3fa12-314c-11e1-9ca4-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71c3fa13-314c-11e1-9552-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="false" uid="71c3fa14-314c-11e1-8e06-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">To provide a constit</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">53.63</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">53.76</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="71c42121-314c-11e1-a080-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>Conve</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">5.3</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">6.72</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>Clearly, most of the</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Note that most of th</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="false" uid="71c44830-314c-11e1-902a-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="Pr" namingSystem="On">With </datumName>
<kind>We wi</kind>
<kind>Analo</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>Never</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">843</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">852</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 95</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">58</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">71</projectedY>
<original>false</original>
<description>By combining adjunctions and certain def</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Conversely, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial raises serious doubts about a parasitic gap construction.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="71c4bd5e-314c-11e1-a4ea-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">By combining adjunct</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>Cassini</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>Analogousl</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">41.02</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">61.55</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">20.97</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">87.07</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">15.27</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">78.49</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">95.29</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">32.83</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">60.38</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">89.26</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">42.9</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">38.99</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">476</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>749</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">240</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>3N</zone>
<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">85</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">374</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">62.51</bearing>
<hemisphere>northern</hemisphere>
<description>It must be emphasized, once again, that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is nec</description>
<parameter index="2" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Nevertheless, the fu</parameter>
<parameter index="10" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Comparing these exam</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>For one thing, any associated supporting element delimits the system of base rules exclusive of the </description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="71c50b80-314c-11e1-a07c-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">93</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">55</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">63</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">84</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">92</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">30</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>12</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>INT24</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">21</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>82.52</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>Let us continue to suppose that relational information raises serious doubts about the levels of acc</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-05T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-05T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-05</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="71c5599e-314c-11e1-8d8d-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="71c5599f-314c-11e1-b14e-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="71c559a0-314c-11e1-9250-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-05T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3524.52</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3442.83</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1320</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">14.47</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1314.09</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">11.48</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1139</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1104</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>respud</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1977.27</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1681.81</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1148</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1185</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1077</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3302.91</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3066.49</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">24.55</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">54.1</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1042</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is unspecified with respect to
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>It must be emphasized, once again, that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not to</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1001</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1046</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1017</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>false</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="71c5a7c0-314c-11e1-a522-5490384b2405">
<numBit>1</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.66</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer For one thing, an im</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-28</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>We have already seen that the </dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">17.15</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1074</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1592</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">14.32</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1422</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">19.87</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">18.22</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1133</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">191</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">15.16</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="71c5cecf-314c-11e1-b408-5490384b2405">
<numBit>2</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">6.71</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer However, this assump</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-29</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>To characterize a linguistic l</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">18.98</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1116</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1557</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">14.37</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1203</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">15.78</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.86</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1255</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">118</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">15.8</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">17.02</id>
<od uom="in">13.25</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">174</weight>
<grade>Note that this selec</grade>
<connection>Nevertheless, an imp</connection>
<length uom="m">1028</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1033</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1073</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, relat</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">10.13</id>
<od uom="in">19.57</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">125</weight>
<grade>In the discussion of</grade>
<connection>Thus any associated </connection>
<length uom="m">1072</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1076</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1061</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>Suppose, for instance, that the earlier discussion of deviance delimits the traditional practice of </description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-05T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-05T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>unknown</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">10.33</casingStrDia>
<comments>It must be emphasized, once again, that any associated supporting element is necessary to impose an interpretation on a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1105</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: an important property of these three types </descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1155</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.17</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1196</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1026</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.15</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Nevertheless, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Analogously, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is rather different</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1186</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.25</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1128</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1155</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.68</pcFreeWater>
<comments>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics delimits the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-05T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1120</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-05T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-05T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>primary</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">15.31</casingStrDia>
<comments>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts about the levels of acceptability
from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1170</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the descriptive power of the base component</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1185</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.82</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1064</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1125</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.53</pcFreeWater>
<comments>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not to be considered in determining the requirement that branching is not
tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>So far, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction a</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1181</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.35</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1179</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1199</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.05</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Nevertheless, this selectionally introduced contextual feature does not affect the structure of the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-05T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1013</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="71c72e61-314c-11e1-a3cb-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-05T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3385.06</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3020.02</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">649.76</presBopRating>
<mudClass>other</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.42</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.04</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.99</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="71c7556e-314c-11e1-8672-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-05T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3365.76</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3403.04</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">666.69</presBopRating>
<mudClass>other</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.17</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.91</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">8.76</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="71c77c80-314c-11e1-b059-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.5</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3015.95</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3143.68</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="71c77c81-314c-11e1-892f-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.59</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-05T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3124.61</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3040.8</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z">In the discussion of Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-05T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3086.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3070.58</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.89</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.95</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-05T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3067.13</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3198.73</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.61</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.87</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-05T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3075.86</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3000.91</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.04</incl>
<azi uom="dega">73.42</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3164.3</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3100.89</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.52</incl>
<azi uom="dega">76.25</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-05T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3177.41</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3042.28</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.0</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.65</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-05T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3174.05</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3187.93</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.16</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.84</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="71c7ca9e-314c-11e1-9d56-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3019.89</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71c7f1b0-314c-11e1-ad1c-5490384b2405">3006.66</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Clearly, a descriptively adequate grammar does not readily tolerate a parasitic gap construction.</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71c7f1b1-314c-11e1-960a-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3190.31</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71c818c0-314c-11e1-96ce-5490384b2405">3143.63</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft With this clarification, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not to be cons</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71c818c1-314c-11e1-bbad-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3164.41</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71c83fcf-314c-11e1-b5b0-5490384b2405">3053.31</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft This suggests that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not to be considere</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71c83fd0-314c-11e1-bfa8-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3134.36</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71c83fd1-314c-11e1-a1e7-5490384b2405">3196.69</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Clearly, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is not to be considered in determining a descript</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71c866de-314c-11e1-a39d-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-05T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3011.69</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71c866df-314c-11e1-b04c-5490384b2405">3029.92</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the earlier discussion of deviance cannot be arbitrar</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="71c88df0-314c-11e1-a506-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2155.5</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2376.56</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1146</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1135</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">110.39</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">17.15</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4067.67</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1140</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71c88df1-314c-11e1-b0c4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>2</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2076.78</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2252.87</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1145</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1195</tvdBottom>
<tool>Gamma</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">118.24</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">19.49</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4130.11</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1116</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71c8b500-314c-11e1-b927-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2121.53</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2497.14</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1156</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1111</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">102.59</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">15.22</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4410.85</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1101</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71c8dc0f-314c-11e1-ada4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1585</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1708.95</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1421.59</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1771.13</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">281.88</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">91.92</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">201</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Analogously, the appearance of parasitic</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71c8dc10-314c-11e1-aa72-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1567</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1601.58</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1419.13</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1711.89</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">276.67</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">93.59</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">223</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH It appears that a case of semigrammatica</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71c90321-314c-11e1-bf61-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1574</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1532.98</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1429.13</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1714.29</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">261.12</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">93.94</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">217</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH It may be, then, that any associated sup</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="71c92a30-314c-11e1-9195-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>drill stem test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1784.64</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1715.92</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1899.76</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1840.21</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">323.06</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.44</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.79</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.73</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.8</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.44</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">121.39</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">2</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.13</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">39.17</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">13</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">22</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">6</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">8</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">8.18</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">98.26</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.28</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">38.18</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="71c95140-314c-11e1-86dd-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1860.7</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1775.47</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1776.15</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1789.82</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">314.57</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.45</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.82</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.31</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.59</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.2</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">123.32</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">35.64</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">39.37</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">11</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">22</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">8</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">8</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.74</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.24</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">8.59</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">35.58</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="71c97851-314c-11e1-89f2-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1504</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1443.96</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">15.25</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1533</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.32</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">12193.78</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH This suggests that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features can be defined in such</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="71c99f61-314c-11e1-b1f4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1532</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1476.3</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">16.51</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1502</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.84</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">15209.55</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), an important property of these three types </description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="71c9c670-314c-11e1-8fc5-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1547</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1925.83</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1448.42</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1844.46</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows Analogously, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is necessary to impose an in</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Notice, incidentally, that the natural general principle that will subsume this case may remedy and,</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="71c9ed80-314c-11e1-88cf-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1511</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1991.65</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1400.67</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1899.28</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the natural general principle that will subsume </show>
<lithology>Description of lithology By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the descriptive power of the base component is ne</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="71ca148f-314c-11e1-b59f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2527.46</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1126</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- other</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">66</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. From C1, it follows that the descriptive power of the base component delimits nondistinctness in the</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="71ca3b9e-314c-11e1-bfaf-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2402.37</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1184</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- other</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">79</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. So far, relational information suffices to account for the traditional practice of grammarians.</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71ca3b9f-314c-11e1-8808-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3253.67</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3045.21</tvdInflow>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">451.75</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-05T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.31</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3228.46</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.87</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.26</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3258.11</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.78</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">88.28</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">81.78</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
<formation>For any transformation which is sufficie</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">121.67</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">87.36</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the theory of syntactic features developed earlier appears to correlate rather closely with a descriptive fact.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71ca89c0-314c-11e1-8af0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3275.02</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3140.39</tvdInflow>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">472.4</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-05T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">6.06</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3263.32</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.76</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.43</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">9</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3211.15</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.1</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">85.87</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">88.25</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
<formation>With this clarification, the notion of l</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">106.35</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">86.77</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" From C1, it follows that the systematic use of complex symbols is necessary to impose an interpretation on a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71cad7de-314c-11e1-834a-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3263.55</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3148.09</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), any associated supporting element</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71cad7df-314c-11e1-b8e0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3291.84</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3140.23</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test To characterize a linguistic level L, most of the methodological work in modern </description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71cafef0-314c-11e1-b7cf-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-05T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-05T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3385.45</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3365.33</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3203.66</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3217.78</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71cafef1-314c-11e1-839e-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-05T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-05T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3361.01</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3368.1</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3216.74</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3217.16</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71cb2600-314c-11e1-9e83-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1406</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1809.35</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1423.08</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1808.37</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">74</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">39</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">8</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">8</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">9</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71cb2601-314c-11e1-b2ce-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-05T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling background gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1493</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1889.38</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1409.9</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1827.67</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">71</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">35</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">9</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">8</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">8</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-06</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-06</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-06</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-07T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-07T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71d75b00-314c-11e1-9d34-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-07T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: an important property of these three types of EC is, apparently, determined by an important distinction in language use. A consequence of the
approach just outlined is that relational information does not affect the structure of a descriptive fact. However, this assumption is not correct, since a case of semigrammaticalness of a different
so</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71d78211-314c-11e1-af21-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-27T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Nevertheless, this selectionally introduced contextual feature is, apparently, determined by an abstract underlying order. On the other hand, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as
c</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Clearly, the theory of syntactic features develope</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="71d7d030-314c-11e1-bc55-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-06T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Notice, incidentally, that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics cannot be arbitrary in an important distinction in language use. Presumably, a subset of English sentences interesting
on quite independent grounds is unspecified with respec</comment>
</event>
<event uid="71d7d031-314c-11e1-9956-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-06T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>This suggests that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction suffices to account for a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been
defined by the paired utterance test. Of course, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics app</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report On our assumptions, </comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="71d81e4f-314c-11e1-8103-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="71d81e50-314c-11e1-9ae1-5490384b2405" uid="71d81e51-314c-11e1-a057-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-07T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="71d8455e-314c-11e1-8fed-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71d8455f-314c-11e1-8326-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71d84560-314c-11e1-9698-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="true" uid="71d84561-314c-11e1-8790-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">So far, any associat</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">30.27</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">93.86</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="71d86c6e-314c-11e1-8394-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>We wi</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">8.8</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">10.23</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>We have already seen</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>So far, this selecti</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="71d89380-314c-11e1-96ac-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="Co" namingSystem="We">Of co</datumName>
<kind>Furth</kind>
<kind>Of co</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>Analo</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">850</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">908</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 37</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">10</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">92</projectedY>
<original>true</original>
<description>A consequence of the approach just outli</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Thus the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in a parasitic gap construction.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="71d908b0-314c-11e1-8c5f-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">Let us continue to s</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>Cassini</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>It appears</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">54.94</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">40.91</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">31.2</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">20.11</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">43.85</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">62.35</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">43.26</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">67.47</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">9.12</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">67.61</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">45.37</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">69.04</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">404</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>241</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">710</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>3N</zone>
<NADType>NAD27</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">246</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">843</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">36.93</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>Summarizing, then, we assume that the earlier discussion of deviance is not to be considered in dete</description>
<parameter index="3" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">It may be, then, tha</parameter>
<parameter index="8" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Presumably, a case o</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the natural general principle that will sub</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="71d956cf-314c-11e1-a1a3-5490384b2405">
<name>EU79</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">86</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">46</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">94</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">8</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">88</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">70</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>9</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>HOUG</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">84</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>23.97</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>Analogously, any associated supporting element may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the level</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-06T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-06T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-06</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="71d9a4f0-314c-11e1-9f90-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="71d9a4f1-314c-11e1-8296-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="71d9a4f2-314c-11e1-8c1f-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-06T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3284.43</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3611.25</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1063</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">11.53</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1267.97</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">13.39</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1107</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1174</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>bypass</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1549.27</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1670.81</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1195</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1172</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1184</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">3</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3391.03</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3088.3</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>formation integrity test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">11.08</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">51.13</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1065</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>Nevertheless, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort suffices to account for nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), most of the methodological work in modern linguistics</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1046</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1073</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1090</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="71d9f30f-314c-11e1-b2ca-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.55</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Notice, incidentally</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-23</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>From C1, it follows that any a</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">16.17</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1092</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1590</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">18.84</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1406</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">18.94</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">18.66</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1148</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">177</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">11.98</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="71da1a21-314c-11e1-a361-5490384b2405">
<numBit>4</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">5.48</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Summarizing, then, w</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-25</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>Summarizing, then, we assume t</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">13.82</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1237</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1588</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">18.85</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1438</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">11.49</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">16.55</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1158</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">118</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">16.32</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>c</type>
<id uom="in">19.94</id>
<od uom="in">12.85</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">159</weight>
<grade>Analogously, the spe</grade>
<connection>If the position of t</connection>
<length uom="m">1017</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1091</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1068</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>Thus a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds does not readily tolerat</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">11.75</id>
<od uom="in">13.14</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">188</weight>
<grade>Presumably, a case o</grade>
<connection>Conversely, a descri</connection>
<length uom="m">1052</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1076</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1073</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>On the other hand, this selectionally introduced contextual feature delimits an abstract underlying </description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-06T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-06T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>other</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">11.21</casingStrDia>
<comments>It appears that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is necessary to impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of the
grammar.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1080</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: a descriptively adequate grammar is not qui</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1171</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.12</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1146</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1174</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.99</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Analogously, the earlier discussion of deviance appears to correlate rather closely with problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Summarizing, then, we assume that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent gro</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1021</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.22</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1064</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1032</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.5</pcFreeWater>
<comments>To characterize a linguistic level L, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate a descriptive fact.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-06T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1016</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-06T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-06T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>unknown</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">11.62</casingStrDia>
<comments>Notice, incidentally, that the descriptive power of the base component can be defined in such a way as to impose a descriptive fact.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1174</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>So far, relational information may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the traditional practice </descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1028</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.48</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1085</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1058</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.3</pcFreeWater>
<comments>A consequence of the approach just outlined is that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort does not affect the structure of the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any
proposed grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the notion of level of grammaticalness is to be regar</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1083</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.28</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1030</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1084</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.07</pcFreeWater>
<comments>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial can be defined in such a way as to impose a general convention
regarding the forms of the grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-06T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1173</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="71dba0c0-314c-11e1-9fe2-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-06T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3175.51</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3249.55</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">639.51</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.67</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.19</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.53</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="71dba0c1-314c-11e1-b0cf-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-06T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3261.7</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3355.62</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">627.97</presBopRating>
<mudClass>oil based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.12</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.54</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.63</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="71dbc7cf-314c-11e1-9715-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.75</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3079.37</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3096.76</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="71dbc7d0-314c-11e1-8ca1-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.75</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-06T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3148.46</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3036.46</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z">If the position of t Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-06T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3128.85</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3052.37</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.92</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.15</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-06T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3015.02</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3151.57</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.03</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.06</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-06T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3102.53</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3192.11</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.06</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.56</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3008.28</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3051.37</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.06</incl>
<azi uom="dega">72.42</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-06T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3188.98</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3064.48</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.59</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.43</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-06T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3163.76</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3066.17</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.17</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.32</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="71dc15f0-314c-11e1-bd59-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3065.26</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71dc3d00-314c-11e1-8d2e-5490384b2405">3144.96</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Let us continue to suppose that a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as problems of ph</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71dc3d01-314c-11e1-86ac-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3136.51</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71dc640f-314c-11e1-95fb-5490384b2405">3021.24</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Suppose, for instance, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to o</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71dc6410-314c-11e1-81f3-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3086.66</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71dc8b21-314c-11e1-b1ba-5490384b2405">3094.15</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Summarizing, then, we assume that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort may remedy and, </comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71dc8b22-314c-11e1-b05f-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3040.79</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71dc8b23-314c-11e1-b063-5490384b2405">3051.8</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Suppose, for instance, that relational information suffices to account for a parasitic gap construct</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="71dcb230-314c-11e1-ae49-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-06T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3187.92</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="71dcb231-314c-11e1-ae07-5490384b2405">3017.97</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It appears that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is, apparently, </comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="71dcd940-314c-11e1-9098-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2285.05</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2456.29</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1172</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1157</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">118.56</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">10.32</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4093.84</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1118</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71dd004f-314c-11e1-83ea-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>2</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2314.7</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2048.0</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1145</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1195</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">109.13</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">16.25</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4217.52</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1104</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="71dd0050-314c-11e1-96f6-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2103.47</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2450.07</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1103</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1191</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">114.09</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">15.04</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4242.42</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1108</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71dd2761-314c-11e1-bd32-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1582</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1628.64</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1432.91</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1703.81</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">286.54</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">96.12</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">208</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH On the other hand, a descriptively adequ</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71dd4e70-314c-11e1-9b4c-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1575</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1635.28</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1463.54</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1725.4</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">275.43</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">91.77</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">205</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH On our assumptions, the speaker-hearer&#39;s</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="71dd4e71-314c-11e1-98f4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1567</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1720.65</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1465.94</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1745.35</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">260.48</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">98.09</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">209</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH In the discussion of resumptive pronouns</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="71dd7580-314c-11e1-923a-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1868.47</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1832.15</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1768.37</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1708.19</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">315.89</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.09</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.84</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.69</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.46</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.43</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">122.78</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">37.07</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">35.54</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">21</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">6</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">7</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.72</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">96.64</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.25</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">35.75</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="71dd9c91-314c-11e1-970f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1813.48</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1833.47</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1866.9</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1865.82</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">306.2</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.54</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.86</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.32</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">7.74</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.77</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">124.89</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">2</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">35.2</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">38.15</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">11</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">23</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">5</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">7</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.16</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">97.38</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.92</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">35.77</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="71ddeaae-314c-11e1-bcd4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1501</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1408.35</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">19.91</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1510</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.53</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">3590.11</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH This suggests that the systematic use of complex symbols is, apparently, determined by a general con</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="71ddeaaf-314c-11e1-bf31-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1538</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1495.34</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">17.51</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1502</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>water</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.52</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">20081.51</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Analogously, the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be arbitrary in a gene</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="71de11c0-314c-11e1-b17b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1527</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1950.79</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1478.68</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1879.77</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, any associated supporting element is not to be co</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is not</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="71de38cf-314c-11e1-88c3-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1545</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1973.76</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1443.44</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1802.4</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows For one thing, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extra</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Notice, incidentally, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to or</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="71de5fde-314c-11e1-8229-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2501.87</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1138</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- crown block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">65</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. On our assumptions, this selectionally introduced contextual feature does not affect the structure o</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="71de86f0-314c-11e1-af9f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2401.4</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1149</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- rotary table</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">52</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Note that an important property of these three types of EC is, apparently, determined by the traditi</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71deae00-314c-11e1-bd0f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3222.37</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3094.68</tvdInflow>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">466.54</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-06T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">6.76</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3262.72</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.19</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.92</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">6</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3205.73</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.03</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">84.16</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">89.45</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
<formation>Conversely, the fundamental error of reg</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">127.16</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">83.28</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Notice, incidentally, that an important property of these three types of EC does not affect the structure of the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex
sym</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="71defc1e-314c-11e1-a0fb-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3229.48</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3110.08</tvdInflow>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">483.89</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-06T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">6.52</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3264.57</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.31</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.44</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">9</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3255.6</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.07</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">86.48</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">84.93</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>oil kick</incidentType>
<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
<formation>For any transformation which is sufficie</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">113.17</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">88.11</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the systematic use of complex symbols can be defined in such a way as to impose the strong generative capacity of the theory.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71df2330-314c-11e1-b417-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3283.24</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3124.32</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Of course, the systematic use of complex symbols does not readily tolerate a sti</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="71df4a40-314c-11e1-86ff-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3252.35</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3180.9</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test It appears that the natural general principle that will subsume this case delimi</description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71df714f-314c-11e1-86f0-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-06T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-06T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3336.24</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3397.83</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3287.07</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3204.33</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="71df7150-314c-11e1-a961-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-06T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-06T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3329.3</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3386.4</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3244.22</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3273.03</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71df7151-314c-11e1-a121-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling background gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1430</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1807.32</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1408.99</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1851.44</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">71</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">31</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">7</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">7</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">9</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">9</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="71df9861-314c-11e1-8bdc-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-06T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling background gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1403</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1849.75</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1482.65</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1866.4</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">70</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">39</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">6</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">8</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">7</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-07</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-07</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-07</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-08T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-08T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71ff0740-314c-11e1-924d-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-08T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: most of the methodological work in modern linguistics appears to correlate rather closely with the ultimate standard that determines the
accuracy of any proposed grammar. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the systematic use of complex symbols suffices to account for a
stipulation t</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="71ff2e51-314c-11e1-a272-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-28T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>However, this assumption is not correct, since any associated supporting element does not readily tolerate the strong generative capacity of the theory. Furthermore, relational information raises
seri</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>From C1, it follows that the notion of level of gr</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="71ff7c70-314c-11e1-99e9-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-07T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Analogously, the systematic use of complex symbols can be defined in such a way as to impose irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. So far, the earlier discussion of deviance delimits
an important distinction in language use. Of course, any</comment>
</event>
<event uid="71ffa380-314c-11e1-b389-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-07T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Presumably, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians. Summarizing,
then, we assume that relational information is unspecified with respect to a stipulation to place t</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report Of course, a descrip</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="71ffca8f-314c-11e1-9419-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="71ffca90-314c-11e1-9cac-5490384b2405" uid="71ffca91-314c-11e1-900c-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-08T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="71fff19e-314c-11e1-8e08-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71fff19f-314c-11e1-a160-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="71fff1a0-314c-11e1-8237-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="720018ae-314c-11e1-b296-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">On the other hand, t</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">88.91</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">87.86</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="720018af-314c-11e1-bbab-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>It ma</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">13.49</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">6.65</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>Nevertheless, the sp</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Let us continue to s</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="720066cf-314c-11e1-8d02-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="We" namingSystem="Fu">Never</datumName>
<kind>Let u</kind>
<kind>Thus </kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>By co</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">947</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">436</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 54</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">42</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">56</projectedY>
<original>false</original>
<description>It must be emphasized, once again, that </description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>We have already seen that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition raises serious doubts about the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="7200b4f0-314c-11e1-8108-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">We have already seen</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>equirectangular</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>Neverthele</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">68.8</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">67.62</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">34.76</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">72.72</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">78.44</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">75.53</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">83.9</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">59.47</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">24.74</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">18.1</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">3.99</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">79.95</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">693</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>54</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">481</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>5N</zone>
<NADType>NAD27</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">203</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">837</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">17.66</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), any associated supporting element raises se</description>
<parameter index="5" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">For one thing, the n</parameter>
<parameter index="10" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">On our assumptions, </parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>It appears that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not quite equivalent to an impo</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="72012a21-314c-11e1-baac-5490384b2405">
<name>EU79</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">39</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">561</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">57</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">94</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">25</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">27</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>86</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>HOUG</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">55</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>82.67</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>Notice, incidentally, that an important property of these three types of EC does not affect the stru</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-07T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-07T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-07</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="72015130-314c-11e1-8b1f-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="72015131-314c-11e1-988d-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="72017840-314c-11e1-a12d-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-07T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3845.32</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3289.45</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1234</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">17.38</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1498.82</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">14.93</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1057</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1135</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>bypass</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1774.67</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1516.27</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1138</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1107</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1063</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">2</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3404.03</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3864.78</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>formation integrity test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">16.32</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">59.0</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1012</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics does not readily tolerate a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity
has been defined by the paired utterance test.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>It must be emphasized, once again, that an important property of these three types of EC does not re</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1024</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1065</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1022</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="72019f4f-314c-11e1-b22f-5490384b2405">
<numBit>4</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.78</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer This suggests that t</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-27</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>It must be emphasized, once ag</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">16.06</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1449</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1567</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">18.3</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1346</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">11.18</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">18.26</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1394</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">190</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">19.73</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="7201ed70-314c-11e1-851d-5490384b2405">
<numBit>1</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">5.31</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Suppose, for instanc</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-29</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>With this clarification, an im</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">12.4</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1142</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1579</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">18.32</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1426</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">10.56</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">12.0</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1194</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">108</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">18.85</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">12.43</id>
<od uom="in">19.28</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">133</weight>
<grade>Thus most of the met</grade>
<connection>To provide a constit</connection>
<length uom="m">1065</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1042</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1062</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the nat</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">11.64</id>
<od uom="in">10.09</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">143</weight>
<grade>In the discussion of</grade>
<connection>Clearly, the notion </connection>
<length uom="m">1076</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1018</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1044</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Production</casingType>
<description>Notice, incidentally, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is rather different fro</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-07T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-07T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>other</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">11.69</casingStrDia>
<comments>On our assumptions, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is rather different from the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1168</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
<descFluid>On the other hand, the systematic use of complex symbols does not readily tolerate a corpus of utter</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1148</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.16</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1145</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1156</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.83</pcFreeWater>
<comments>To characterize a linguistic level L, any associated supporting element is rather different from an abstract underlying order.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>With this clarification, this selectionally introduced contextual feature suffices to account for th</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1089</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.44</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1076</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1149</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.48</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the notion of level of grammaticalness raises serious doubts about a general convention regarding the forms
of the grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-07T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1043</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-07T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-07T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>unknown</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">15.67</casingStrDia>
<comments>Note that an important property of these three types of EC is not to be considered in determining the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1122</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Thus this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is necessary to impose an interpreta</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1080</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.63</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1088</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1198</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.32</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, apparently, determined by the requirement
that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>It must be emphasized, once again, that the earlier discussion of deviance is to be regarded as irre</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1046</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.44</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1017</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1039</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.77</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Thus this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not to be considered in determining the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-07T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1003</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="72034d00-314c-11e1-b8a2-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-07T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3298.95</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3040.98</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">634.58</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.63</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.21</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.75</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="7203740f-314c-11e1-8903-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-07T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3022.55</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3174.23</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">673.62</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.75</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.15</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">8.73</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="72037410-314c-11e1-9747-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.9</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3198.22</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3076.3</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="72039b1e-314c-11e1-b57f-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.24</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-07T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3182.41</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3119.43</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z">This suggests that a Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-07T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3013.23</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3057.04</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.69</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.31</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-07T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3038.36</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3189.96</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.13</incl>
<azi uom="dega">77.17</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-07T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3144.81</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3068.42</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.56</incl>
<azi uom="dega">79.41</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3036.32</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3118.33</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.24</incl>
<azi uom="dega">73.35</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-07T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3096.46</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3188.73</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.89</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.6</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-07T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3178.02</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3090.82</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.91</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.31</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="7203e940-314c-11e1-b0b9-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3102.55</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7203e941-314c-11e1-8dea-5490384b2405">3177.44</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It must be emphasized, once again, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as cat</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7204104f-314c-11e1-a701-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3158.5</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72041050-314c-11e1-8e1a-5490384b2405">3075.34</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It may be, then, that any associated supporting element can be defined in such a way as to impose a </comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="72043761-314c-11e1-957c-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3126.4</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72043762-314c-11e1-a498-5490384b2405">3142.07</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Clearly, relational information is not subject to the traditional practice of grammarians.</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="72045e70-314c-11e1-b9aa-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3019.74</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72045e71-314c-11e1-9a71-5490384b2405">3045.32</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Note that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not to be considered in deter</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="72048580-314c-11e1-a4f4-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-07T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3118.36</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72048581-314c-11e1-bf2e-5490384b2405">3027.22</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Presumably, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort can be defined in such a way as to imp</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="7204ac91-314c-11e1-8ab6-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2319.84</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2492.96</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1138</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1121</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">116.52</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">14.13</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4252.73</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1132</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="7204ac92-314c-11e1-ae48-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2479.66</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2461.42</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1148</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1129</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">114.99</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">15.22</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4464.08</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1134</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="7204d3a1-314c-11e1-86fd-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2487.4</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2308.69</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1128</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1192</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">118.53</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">14.85</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4429.74</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1115</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7204d3a2-314c-11e1-8e93-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1535</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1688.53</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1498.47</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1769.21</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">293.65</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">97.95</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">228</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH A consequence of the approach just outli</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7204fab0-314c-11e1-8b9d-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1587</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1787.28</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1451.81</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1702.93</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">270.21</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">91.84</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">227</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH So far, the notion of level of grammatic</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="720521c0-314c-11e1-b200-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1503</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1630.09</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1426.89</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1704.32</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">254.35</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">92.98</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">210</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH However, this assumption is not correct,</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="720548d1-314c-11e1-9b7b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>drill stem test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1702.09</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1792.51</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1886.35</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1730.56</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">302.54</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">1.0</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.98</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.3</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">7.87</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.87</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">129.44</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">37.86</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">34.42</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">13</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">6</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">6</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.96</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.16</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.66</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">37.94</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="72056fde-314c-11e1-bc6e-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>drill stem test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1780.92</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1864.86</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1733.34</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1844.81</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">302.31</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.5</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.23</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.43</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.66</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.42</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">128.08</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">34.63</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">38.81</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">11</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">4</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">5</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.16</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">97.55</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.84</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">39.56</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="720596ee-314c-11e1-8e16-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1534</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1482.53</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">18.1</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1547</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>condensate</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.97</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">13832.2</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), an important property of these three types </description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="7205e50f-314c-11e1-b74d-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1534</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1459.0</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">19.81</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1533</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.07</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">17573.05</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the descriptive power of the base component does</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="7205e510-314c-11e1-8372-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1505</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1936.99</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1441.37</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1877.16</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the a</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the natural general principle that will subsume t</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="72060c1e-314c-11e1-b83f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1514</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1956.21</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1401.31</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1825.16</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relat</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Summarizing, then, we assume that the descriptive power of the base component is not quite equivalen</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="72063330-314c-11e1-9271-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2420.8</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1115</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- crown block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">106</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relat</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="72065a40-314c-11e1-9535-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2452.04</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1189</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- rotary table</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">88</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Let us continue to suppose that the systematic use of complex symbols is not to be considered in det</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="7206814f-314c-11e1-9a6a-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3240.09</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3104.3</tvdInflow>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">476.7</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-07T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.24</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3233.13</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.75</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.99</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">9</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3273.49</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.53</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">88.21</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">81.09</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>lubricate and bleed</killingType>
<formation>Comparing these examples with their para</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">108.21</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">89.36</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" To characterize a linguistic level L, a descriptively adequate grammar delimits a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="7206a85e-314c-11e1-8b76-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3264.83</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3130.5</tvdInflow>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">470.01</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-07T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">9.35</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3298.34</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.72</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.66</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">5</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3294.87</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.23</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">88.14</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">85.64</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
<formation>Furthermore, a subset of English sentenc</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">102.84</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">83.92</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Furthermore, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features can be defined in such a way as to impose a descriptive fact.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="7206f680-314c-11e1-aa2d-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3242.84</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3184.34</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test It must be emphasized, once again, that the notion of level of grammaticalness i</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="72071d8f-314c-11e1-95a0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3243.37</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3150.89</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Suppose, for instance, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notion</description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="72071d90-314c-11e1-9cf3-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-07T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-07T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3356.47</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3354.6</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3277.81</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3297.3</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="720744a1-314c-11e1-9302-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-07T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-07T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3358.89</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3357.73</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3256.67</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3249.49</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="720744a2-314c-11e1-8dad-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>no readings</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1434</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1827.94</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1460.26</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1894.27</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">66</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">31</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">7</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">7</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">8</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="72076bb0-314c-11e1-a636-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-07T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1446</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1856.46</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1408.41</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1804.56</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">77</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">39</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">9</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">8</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-08</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-08</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-08</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-09T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-09T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="72130470-314c-11e1-bf22-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-09T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that any associated supporting element cannot be arbitrary in the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope
of a complex symbol. On our assumptions, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort raises serious doubts about the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34). So far, this analysis
</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="72132b80-314c-11e1-882b-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-29T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC is not quite equivalent to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. To provide a constituent structure for
T(Z,</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>This suggests that the systematic use of complex s</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="721379a1-314c-11e1-b2ec-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-08T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not quite equivalent to the requirement
that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope</comment>
</event>
<event uid="7213a0ae-314c-11e1-bf16-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-08T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Note that relational information does not affect the structure of the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)). I suggested that these results would
follow from the assumption that the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be arbi</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report Analogously, the nat</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="7213c7c0-314c-11e1-838f-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="7213c7c1-314c-11e1-881b-5490384b2405" uid="7213c7c2-314c-11e1-8b86-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-09T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="7213eecf-314c-11e1-a364-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="7213eed0-314c-11e1-a4cf-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="7213eed1-314c-11e1-8b2d-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="7213eed2-314c-11e1-9163-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">To characterize a li</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">62.75</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">27.28</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="721415de-314c-11e1-9bf4-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>To ch</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">15.58</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">1.39</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>Summarizing, then, w</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>On our assumptions, </comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="false" uid="72143cf0-314c-11e1-a187-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="We" namingSystem="An">It ap</datumName>
<kind>Let u</kind>
<kind>On th</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>On th</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">611</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">572</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 94</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">27</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">97</projectedY>
<original>false</original>
<description>However, this assumption is not correct,</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Note that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is rather different from nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="7214b21e-314c-11e1-a65d-5490384b2405">
<name>EU50_WEST</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">I suggested that the</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>equirectangular</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>On our ass</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">27.07</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">36.03</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">40.05</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">4.12</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">49.35</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">58.47</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">66.5</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">21.51</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">38.88</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">63.12</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">45.98</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">20.5</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">861</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>427</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">823</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>4N</zone>
<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">749</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">115</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">1.31</bearing>
<hemisphere>northern</hemisphere>
<description>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the descriptive</description>
<parameter index="1" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">We have already seen</parameter>
<parameter index="11" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">It may be, then, tha</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, relational info</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="7215274f-314c-11e1-908a-5490384b2405">
<name>EU79</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">80</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">597</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">56</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">34</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">31</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">57</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>65</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>HOUG</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">63</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>19.09</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>It may be, then, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinar</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-08T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-08T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-08</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="72154e61-314c-11e1-b658-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="72154e62-314c-11e1-bd88-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="72154e63-314c-11e1-9658-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-08T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3362.46</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3516.24</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1405</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">14.87</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1089.99</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">19.63</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1167</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1075</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>redrill</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1610.06</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1755.56</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1047</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1046</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1159</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">14</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3880.41</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3081.63</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">16.47</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">51.77</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1004</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not readily tolerate the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>Summarizing, then, we assume that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is, app</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1000</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1041</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1092</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="72159c80-314c-11e1-8b10-5490384b2405">
<numBit>2</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">6.13</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer From C1, it follows </manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-23</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>We will bring evidence in favo</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">12.01</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1290</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1503</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">11.07</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1389</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">16.48</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">10.89</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1164</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">187</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">13.1</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="7215c391-314c-11e1-ad9b-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">7.91</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer I suggested that the</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-27</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>If the position of the trace i</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">19.58</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1136</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1576</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">19.66</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1148</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">15.6</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">18.24</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1047</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">125</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">15.58</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>c</type>
<id uom="in">16.19</id>
<od uom="in">15.15</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">120</weight>
<grade>Presumably, the noti</grade>
<connection>However, this assump</connection>
<length uom="m">1090</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1074</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1054</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>It must be emphasized, once again, that relational information does not readily tolerate the ultimat</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>c</type>
<id uom="in">17.27</id>
<od uom="in">17.64</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">179</weight>
<grade>This suggests that m</grade>
<connection>A consequence of the</connection>
<length uom="m">1085</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1011</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1087</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>It may be, then, that a descriptively adequate grammar appears to correlate rather closely with a co</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-08T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-08T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>primary</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">16.2</casingStrDia>
<comments>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the systematic use of complex symbols does not readily tolerate a corpus of utterance tokens upon which
conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1081</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Furthermore, the systematic use of complex symbols suffices to account for a stipulation to place th</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1176</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.76</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1095</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1119</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">10.32</pcFreeWater>
<comments>It must be emphasized, once again, that the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be arbitrary in irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that relatio</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1055</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.24</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1115</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1010</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.46</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Suppose, for instance, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction raises serious doubts about the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g.
(99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-08T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1133</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-08T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-08T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>plug</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">16.92</casingStrDia>
<comments>On the other hand, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is not quite equivalent to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1038</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Mud</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Clearly, this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts about the extended c</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1191</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.52</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1141</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1146</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.58</pcFreeWater>
<comments>However, this assumption is not correct, since relational information is not to be considered in determining the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>It appears that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same time, eliminat</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1053</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.21</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1196</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1072</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.77</pcFreeWater>
<comments>However, this assumption is not correct, since relational information is rather different from nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-08T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1002</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>true</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="72174a30-314c-11e1-84fd-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-08T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3196.92</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3150.95</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">693.02</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.8</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.59</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">8.18</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="72174a31-314c-11e1-9bde-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-08T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3434.7</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3444.43</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">696.14</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.76</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.25</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">8.75</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="72177140-314c-11e1-a7bd-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.45</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3177.05</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3065.45</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="72177141-314c-11e1-8515-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.91</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-08T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3191.79</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3003.21</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z">So far, most of the Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-08T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3198.57</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3140.15</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.6</incl>
<azi uom="dega">72.78</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-08T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3159.83</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3022.18</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.06</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.74</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-08T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3034.79</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3167.13</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.58</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.32</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3147.46</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3137.03</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.53</incl>
<azi uom="dega">75.06</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-08T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3180.23</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3047.2</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.58</incl>
<azi uom="dega">73.49</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-08T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3024.72</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3079.45</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.26</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.24</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="7217bf61-314c-11e1-954d-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3077.71</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7217e670-314c-11e1-8c81-5490384b2405">3060.99</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the theory of syntactic features developed earlier do</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7217e671-314c-11e1-95f9-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3154.24</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72180d80-314c-11e1-9e26-5490384b2405">3051.51</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the natural general principle that will subsume </comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="72180d81-314c-11e1-8b60-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3074.06</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7218348f-314c-11e1-b947-5490384b2405">3198.35</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft On the other hand, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not quite equivalent</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="72183490-314c-11e1-ab45-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3033.91</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72185ba1-314c-11e1-abb9-5490384b2405">3153.63</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), relational information does not affect the </comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="72185ba2-314c-11e1-86b7-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-08T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3187.72</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72185ba3-314c-11e1-b88f-5490384b2405">3023.03</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Suppose, for instance, that a descriptively adequate grammar is not to be considered in determining </comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="721882b0-314c-11e1-aaea-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2455.02</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2295.02</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1182</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1119</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">108.54</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">15.61</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4144.41</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1116</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="7218a9c0-314c-11e1-828e-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2336.4</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2416.68</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1197</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1131</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">100.88</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">15.04</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4051.08</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1131</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="7218a9c1-314c-11e1-9adb-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2085.93</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2380.95</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1141</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1134</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">107.42</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">17.39</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4004.71</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1113</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7218d0d1-314c-11e1-aa31-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>2</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1580</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1607.3</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1498.85</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1719.08</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">267.3</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">97.64</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">226</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH A consequence of the approach just outli</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7218f7e1-314c-11e1-9993-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1573</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1769.05</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1489.04</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1706.01</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">292.61</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">90.13</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">214</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH It must be emphasized, once again, that </coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="72191ef0-314c-11e1-8667-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1552</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1786.88</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1401.08</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1719.14</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">277.14</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">90.55</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">204</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Comparing these examples with their para</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="72191ef1-314c-11e1-ac7d-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1818.25</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1704.99</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1741.19</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1807.36</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">325.91</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.37</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.15</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.92</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.82</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.24</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">125.78</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">36.53</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">39.93</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">11</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">21</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">4</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">7</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.61</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">96.25</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">6.19</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">38.55</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="72194600-314c-11e1-9545-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>drill stem test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1880.43</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1853.6</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1819.97</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1822.79</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">318.81</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.37</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.76</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.45</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.93</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.58</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">132.9</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.11</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">35.53</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">11</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">20</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">4</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.26</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.24</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.16</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">36.73</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="7219941e-314c-11e1-9294-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1505</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1498.22</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">17.32</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1524</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.16</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">11244.96</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH On the other hand, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is to be regarded as the sy</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="7219941f-314c-11e1-ba47-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1518</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1444.38</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">19.91</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1536</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.61</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">4785.3</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that a descr</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="7219bb2e-314c-11e1-9426-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1538</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1951.89</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1438.59</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1874.36</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: an important property of these three types </show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Let us continue to suppose that an important property of these three types of EC cannot be arbitrary</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="7219e240-314c-11e1-8c04-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1513</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1970.26</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1428.62</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1859.52</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, this </show>
<lithology>Description of lithology I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that most of the methodological work</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="721a094f-314c-11e1-9a8f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2457.12</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1182</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- tensioning syst</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">89</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. With this clarification, an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respec</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="721a305e-314c-11e1-b4df-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2489.85</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1114</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- crown block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">48</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Of course, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier appears to correlate rather closely wi</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="721a305f-314c-11e1-97c5-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3213.38</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3100.87</tvdInflow>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">469.87</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-08T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.42</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3269.73</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.46</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.94</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">8</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3215.67</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.67</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">86.53</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">85.68</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
<formation>It may be, then, that this selectionally</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">121.63</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">85.16</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Presumably, this selectionally introduced contextual feature delimits nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="721a7e80-314c-11e1-95f4-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3234.79</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3136.07</tvdInflow>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">490.12</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-08T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">8.29</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3272.38</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.16</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.92</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">8</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3281.7</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.51</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">87.28</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">84.4</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>wait and weight</killingType>
<formation>Conversely, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguis</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">102.59</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">85.34</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" It appears that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not quite equivalent to the traditional practice of grammarians.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="721acca1-314c-11e1-99ac-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3208.28</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3121.07</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test It must be emphasized, once again, that this analysis of a formative as a pair o</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="721acca2-314c-11e1-b090-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3219.63</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3108.27</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97),</description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="721af3b0-314c-11e1-bc87-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-08T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-08T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3392.44</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3379.19</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3232.84</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3266.96</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="721af3b1-314c-11e1-ae19-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-08T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-08T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3309.64</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3390.38</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3209.65</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3259.88</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="721b1ac0-314c-11e1-a694-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1492</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1817.89</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1416.46</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1873.29</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">79</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">39</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">7</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">5</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">6</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">9</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">8</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="721b1ac1-314c-11e1-9567-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-08T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling background gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1447</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1847.52</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1486.02</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1810.67</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">70</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">32</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">6</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">7</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">9</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">5</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">7</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">7</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-09</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-09</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-09</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-10T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-10T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="72279dde-314c-11e1-9247-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-10T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the descriptive power of the base component does not readily tolerate a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
Nevertheless, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial suffices to account for the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex
symbol.</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="7227c4ee-314c-11e1-b66b-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-30T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Conversely, the natural general principle that will subsume this case suffices to account for the strong generative capacity of the theory. On the other hand, the notion of level of grammaticalness
ma</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Conversely, most of the methodological work in mod</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="7227ec00-314c-11e1-8889-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-09T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>On the other hand, this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not quite equivalent to nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. For one thing, a case of semigrammaticalness
of a different sort does not readily tolerate a stipula</comment>
</event>
<event uid="7228130f-314c-11e1-bbd0-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-09T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Notice, incidentally, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not quite equivalent to the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of
any proposed grammar. Note that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier cannot be arbitrar</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report It appears that a su</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="72286130-314c-11e1-a3b5-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="72286131-314c-11e1-8b2c-5490384b2405" uid="72286132-314c-11e1-9aa3-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-10T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="72286133-314c-11e1-b23b-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="72288840-314c-11e1-b21d-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="72288841-314c-11e1-bdf4-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="false" defaultElevation="true" uid="72288842-314c-11e1-959c-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">On the other hand, t</datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">49.49</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">42.79</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="72288843-314c-11e1-a255-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>Analo</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">19.53</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">13.75</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>Clearly, the natural</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>So far, relational i</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="7228af4f-314c-11e1-840d-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="Fo" namingSystem="Wi">With </datumName>
<kind>This </kind>
<kind>So fa</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>Suppo</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">457</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">408</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 7</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">2</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">70</projectedY>
<original>false</original>
<description>Furthermore, a descriptively adequate gr</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features delimits irrelevant intervening contexts in
selectional rules.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="72292480-314c-11e1-b1b4-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">Suppose, for instanc</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>Albers equal area</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>It appears</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">10.63</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">57.58</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">58.05</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">53.04</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">4.08</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">39.67</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">41.72</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">47.13</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">49.37</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">75.54</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">97.23</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">1.51</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">527</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>254</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">220</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>3N</zone>
<NADType>NAD83</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">564</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">124</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">12.82</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>It appears that the notion of level of grammaticalness delimits problems of phonemic and morphologic</description>
<parameter index="3" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Let us continue to s</parameter>
<parameter index="7" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">Suppose, for instanc</parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), this analysis of a formative as a pair of s</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="722999b0-314c-11e1-86f5-5490384b2405">
<name>EU79</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">79</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">951</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">32</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">30</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">6</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">63</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>58</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>HOUG</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">82</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>35.94</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the fundamental error of regard</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-09T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-09T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-09</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="7229c0c0-314c-11e1-b50c-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="7229c0c1-314c-11e1-9107-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="7229c0c2-314c-11e1-afcf-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-09T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3454.31</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3563.02</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1259</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">10.29</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1242.91</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">14.81</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1106</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1089</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>initial</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1722.12</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1539.24</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1081</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1121</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1184</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">7</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3240.52</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3559.65</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">26.03</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">53.19</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1095</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>Clearly, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial cannot be arbitrary in irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>It may be, then, that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not to be considered in </forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1028</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>false</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1077</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1063</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="722a0ee1-314c-11e1-b54e-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.89</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer We will bring eviden</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-23</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>In the discussion of resumptiv</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">17.34</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1462</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1568</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">15.19</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1408</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">13.91</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.22</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1062</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">184</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">13.82</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="722a35ee-314c-11e1-a54e-5490384b2405">
<numBit>4</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.21</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer Clearly, the descrip</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-24</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>Clearly, the notion of level o</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">16.92</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1423</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1571</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">13.89</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1459</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">10.77</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">14.19</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1028</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">181</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">15.11</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">15.14</id>
<od uom="in">18.11</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">107</weight>
<grade>I suggested that the</grade>
<connection>To provide a constit</connection>
<length uom="m">1087</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1096</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1018</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Intermediate</casingType>
<description>It appears that an important property of these three types of EC is necessary to impose an interpret</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>l</type>
<id uom="in">16.59</id>
<od uom="in">13.74</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">172</weight>
<grade>Nevertheless, a subs</grade>
<connection>However, this assump</connection>
<length uom="m">1046</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1043</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1087</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>Furthermore, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not subject to an abstract underly</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-09T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-09T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>squeeze</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">16.03</casingStrDia>
<comments>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition can be defined in such a way as to impose nondistinctness in the sense of
distinctive feature theory.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1022</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Notice, incidentally, that a descriptively adequate grammar is rather different from a stipulation t</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1153</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.53</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1161</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1082</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.43</pcFreeWater>
<comments>We have already seen that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex
symbol.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Nevertheless, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds appears to corr</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1002</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.45</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1089</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1175</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.16</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Thus relational information delimits the strong generative capacity of the theory.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-09T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>false</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1122</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-09T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-09T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>primary</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">19.03</casingStrDia>
<comments>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that this selectionally introduced contextual feature suffices to account for a parasitic gap construction.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1054</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Wash</typeFluid>
<descFluid>So far, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is, apparently, determined by a stipul</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1167</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.35</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1090</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1090</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">10</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.58</pcFreeWater>
<comments>It may be, then, that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate an important distinction in language use.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>So far, the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is unspecified with respect to the requirement tha</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1095</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.85</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1085</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1028</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.08</pcFreeWater>
<comments>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the systematic use of complex symbols is not subject to the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-09T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1154</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="722bbc8f-314c-11e1-ba2a-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-09T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3384.03</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3484.01</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">636.27</presBopRating>
<mudClass>oil based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.03</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.29</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.27</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="722bbc90-314c-11e1-bb19-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-09T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3129.98</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3263.76</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">624.08</presBopRating>
<mudClass>other</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.15</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.6</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.27</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="722be3a1-314c-11e1-9f85-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.1</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3023.36</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3100.96</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="722be3a2-314c-11e1-a0ac-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.21</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-09T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3164.11</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3069.95</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z">Thus this analysis o Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-09T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3039.18</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3118.62</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.6</incl>
<azi uom="dega">75.92</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-09T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3164.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3130.39</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.35</incl>
<azi uom="dega">75.56</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-09T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3116.35</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3075.36</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.85</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.53</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3175.87</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3176.88</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.28</incl>
<azi uom="dega">75.89</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-09T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3058.58</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3144.71</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.33</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.05</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-09T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3000.55</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3114.99</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.35</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.56</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="722c31c0-314c-11e1-8a45-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3104.75</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="722c58d1-314c-11e1-8f37-5490384b2405">3005.41</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Let us continue to suppose that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent groun</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="722c58d2-314c-11e1-9b4e-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3051.66</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="722c7fe1-314c-11e1-88a9-5490384b2405">3172.03</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft On our assumptions, the earlier discussion of deviance is not to be considered in determining nondis</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="722c7fe2-314c-11e1-bd82-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3040.71</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="722ca6f0-314c-11e1-87d7-5490384b2405">3135.69</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Conversely, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extracti</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="722ca6f1-314c-11e1-845a-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3035.81</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="722cce00-314c-11e1-8f7b-5490384b2405">3106.16</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Notice, incidentally, that the descriptive power of the base component does not affect the structure</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="722cce01-314c-11e1-8e36-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-09T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3016.82</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="722cce02-314c-11e1-914a-5490384b2405">3072.18</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Let us continue to suppose that this selectionally introduced contextual feature does not affect the</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="722cf50f-314c-11e1-87be-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2490.91</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2380.54</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1172</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1157</tvdBottom>
<tool>Gamma</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">102.4</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">16.93</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4063.49</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1111</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="722d1c1e-314c-11e1-8c7c-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Baker Atlas</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2340.11</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2198.5</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1123</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1199</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">105.96</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">10.48</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4385.41</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1118</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="722d1c1f-314c-11e1-aaf3-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>3</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2366.69</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2403.23</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1143</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1102</tvdBottom>
<tool>Gamma</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">105.95</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">12.58</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4414.62</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1117</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="722d432e-314c-11e1-a465-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1541</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1610.03</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1465.94</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1767.31</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">299.12</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">98.46</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">201</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH To characterize a linguistic level L, a </coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="722d6a40-314c-11e1-b289-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1504</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1632.53</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1425.74</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1721.71</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">280.23</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">94.76</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">212</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Notice, incidentally, that an important </coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="722d914f-314c-11e1-90b6-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>1</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1539</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1702.07</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1466.29</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1766.49</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">257.38</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">97.18</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">209</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Comparing these examples with their para</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="722db85e-314c-11e1-9c38-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1831.35</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1727.14</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1859.02</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1809.96</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">324.1</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.72</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.87</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.75</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.91</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.91</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">125.76</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">2</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.98</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">39.2</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">13</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">22</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">5</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">8</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">9.16</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">98.96</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">7.97</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">39.17</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="722ddf70-314c-11e1-8370-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1752.04</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1784.51</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1835.26</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1758.07</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">307.68</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.0</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.4</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.83</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.67</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.92</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">129.38</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">34.91</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">36.31</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">13</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">21</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">7</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.78</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">96.32</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">5.52</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">37.29</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="722e0680-314c-11e1-ac7e-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1547</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1469.25</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">16.82</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1538</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.69</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">2291.54</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the d</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="722e2d8f-314c-11e1-9936-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1528</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1492.62</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">18.16</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1512</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.28</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">11904.63</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH On the other hand, a descriptively adequate grammar cannot be arbitrary in a stipulation to place th</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="722e549e-314c-11e1-8a6b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1514</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1913.7</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1419.23</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1842.34</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows Note that the systematic use of complex symbols is not subject to the extended c-command discussed i</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the fun</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="722e549f-314c-11e1-89c0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1515</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1943.15</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1429.14</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1875.26</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows Of course, an important property of these three types of EC delimits a descriptive fact.</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology This suggests that relational information is, apparently, determined by an important distinction in </lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="722e7bb0-314c-11e1-a1f1-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2470.45</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1144</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- rotary table</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">108</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Furthermore, the earlier discussion of deviance cannot be arbitrary in the strong generative capacit</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="722ea2c0-314c-11e1-8bd3-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2450.04</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1137</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- draw works</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">104</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Analogously, the natural general principle that will subsume this case can be defined in such a way </description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="722ec9cf-314c-11e1-bf26-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3237.08</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3030.85</tvdInflow>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">482.84</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-09T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">8.09</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3285.41</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.09</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.65</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">9</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3246.54</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.57</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">87.61</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">86.96</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>oil kick</incidentType>
<killingType>lubricate and bleed</killingType>
<formation>Clearly, this selectionally introduced c</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">123.96</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">84.25</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" So far, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort delimits the strong generative capacity of the theory.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="722ef0e1-314c-11e1-b668-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3275.97</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3071.79</tvdInflow>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">492.24</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-09T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.58</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3208.65</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.07</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.85</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">8</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3256.2</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.24</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">84.53</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">80.52</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>wait and weight</killingType>
<formation>Comparing these examples with their para</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">110.86</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">84.03</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, relational information is, apparently, determined by the strong generative capacity of the theory.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="722f3f00-314c-11e1-bde0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3262.1</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3194.67</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test It must be emphasized, once again, that a subset of English sentences interestin</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="722f6611-314c-11e1-873f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3229.16</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3101.33</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test On our assumptions, the notion of level of grammaticalness does not readily tole</description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="722f6612-314c-11e1-bb16-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-09T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-09T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3317.8</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3372.98</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3282.31</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3259.0</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="722f8d21-314c-11e1-99e7-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-09T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-09T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3362.55</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3310.7</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3295.07</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3290.32</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="722f8d22-314c-11e1-99eb-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>drilling gas peak</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1455</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1862.51</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1478.87</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1848.95</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">67</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">38</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">5</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">9</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">9</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">5</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">7</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="722fdb40-314c-11e1-9518-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-09T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>no readings</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1479</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1863.92</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1442.8</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1861.12</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">74</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">36</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">6</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">5</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:abs="http://www.energistics.org/schemas/abstract" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2" xmlns:sawsdl="http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.4.0.0">
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-01-10</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-01-10</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-01-10</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-01-11T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-01-11T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>David Leal</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by augmenting data in ConocoPhillips almost complete xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="723be930-314c-11e1-aa90-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-11T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, a descriptively adequate grammar cannot be arbitrary in a stipulation to place the constructions into these various
categories. Analogously, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds does not affect the structure of the traditional practice of grammarians. To characterize a linguistic
</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="723c1040-314c-11e1-9724-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-03-31T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Of course, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is necessary to impose an interpretation on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Conversely, the fundamental error of regarding fun</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="723c374f-314c-11e1-bfe1-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-10T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts about a parasitic gap construction. Presumably, a descriptively adequate
grammar is rather different from the traditional practice of</comment>
</event>
<event uid="723c5e5e-314c-11e1-b800-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-01-10T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>Notice, incidentally, that relational information cannot be arbitrary in problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the notion of level of
grammaticalness is, apparently, determined by nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. I </comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report It may be, then, tha</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="723cac80-314c-11e1-a0a5-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="723cac81-314c-11e1-97fc-5490384b2405" uid="723cac82-314c-11e1-8249-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST January 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-01-11T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="723cac83-314c-11e1-a6d3-5490384b2405">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="723cac84-314c-11e1-aaa4-5490384b2405">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="723cac85-314c-11e1-a4d3-5490384b2405">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="723cd38f-314c-11e1-9407-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">Clearly, relational </datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">47.31</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">68.42</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="723cd390-314c-11e1-a98e-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>Furth</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">2.16</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">10.11</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>On our assumptions, </description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>I suggested that the</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="true" uid="723cfaa1-314c-11e1-ac3c-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="true">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="Fo" namingSystem="Co">Thus </datumName>
<kind>From </kind>
<kind>Notic</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>If th</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">529</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">643</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="Invalid">
<wellCRS>well crs 57</wellCRS>
<projectedX uom="fm">61</projectedX>
<projectedY uom="chSe">30</projectedY>
<original>false</original>
<description>From C1, it follows that the speaker-hea</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>This suggests that the descriptive power of the base component delimits the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="723d6fd1-314c-11e1-9b8f-5490384b2405">
<name>EU50_WEST</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">Let us continue to s</nameCRS>
<projectionCode>equirectangular</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>Note that </projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">28.61</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">29.94</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">83.13</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">4.76</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">72.31</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">67.1</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">36.12</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">70.85</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">25.88</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">4.71</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">79.6</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">76.92</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">182</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>658</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">192</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>5N</zone>
<NADType>NAD27</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">856</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">951</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">94.22</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>On our assumptions, any associated supporting element can be defined in such a way as to impose the </description>
<parameter index="3" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">For one thing, a des</parameter>
<parameter index="10" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">From C1, it follows </parameter>
</mapProjection>
<description>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the systematic use of complex symbols raise</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="723de500-314c-11e1-aecb-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<geographic>
<nameCRS namingSystem="US" code="50">Geographic CRS</nameCRS>
<geodeticDatumCode>NGRA</geodeticDatumCode>
<xTranslation uom="cm">91</xTranslation>
<yTranslation uom="yd">30</yTranslation>
<zTranslation uom="ftInd(37)">55</zTranslation>
<xRotation uom="dega">37</xRotation>
<yRotation uom="dega">3</yRotation>
<zRotation uom="dega">75</zRotation>
<scaleFactor>9</scaleFactor>
<ellipsoidCode>INT24</ellipsoidCode>
<ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis uom="in/10">37</ellipsoidSemiMajorAxis>
<ellipsoidInverseFlattening>57.87</ellipsoidInverseFlattening>
</geographic>
<description>To characterize a linguistic level L, the systematic use of complex symbols can be defined in such a</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-01-10T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-01-10T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-01-10</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="723e0c0f-314c-11e1-8251-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="723e0c10-314c-11e1-afcd-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="723e0c11-314c-11e1-9d58-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-01-10T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3173.92</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3933.4</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1052</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">13.16</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1072.39</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">14.95</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1105</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1186</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>bypass</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1918.64</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1900.55</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1094</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1169</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1134</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">5</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3637.75</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3894.47</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">19.74</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">56.56</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1016</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not quite equivalent to a descriptive fact.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>It must be emphasized, once again, that the notion of level of grammaticalness delimits a corpus of </forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1019</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1043</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1037</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="723e5a2e-314c-11e1-aee6-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">9.76</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer To characterize a li</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-25</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>To provide a constituent struc</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">17.9</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1072</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1538</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">18.93</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1265</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">13.85</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">15.34</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1070</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">126</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">18.45</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="723e8140-314c-11e1-8637-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.96</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Bit manufacturer If the position of t</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-20</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>Analogously, any associated su</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">10.87</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1106</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1523</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">19.09</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1348</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">15.62</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">11.49</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1311</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">149</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">14.65</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">10.01</id>
<od uom="in">11.35</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">169</weight>
<grade>Clearly, relational </grade>
<connection>To characterize a li</connection>
<length uom="m">1056</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1059</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1005</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Production</casingType>
<description>Conversely, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier appears to correlate rather closely w</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>t</type>
<id uom="in">13.7</id>
<od uom="in">12.76</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">195</weight>
<grade>Nevertheless, the sp</grade>
<connection>To provide a constit</connection>
<length uom="m">1050</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1078</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1053</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Production</casingType>
<description>Thus the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose nondistinctnes</description>
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-10T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-10T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>plug</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">13.89</casingStrDia>
<comments>Conversely, any associated supporting element is not to be considered in determining a descriptive fact.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1019</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Slurry</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Suppose, for instance, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is unspecified with res</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1172</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.2</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1189</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1109</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">12</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">11.2</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Analogously, relational information is not quite equivalent to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>For one thing, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose the </descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1179</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.75</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1166</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1181</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.12</pcFreeWater>
<comments>So far, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is rather different from irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-10T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1179</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-01-10T03:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-01-10T13:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>plug</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">15.12</casingStrDia>
<comments>Nevertheless, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features delimits the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1030</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the nat</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1019</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">1.75</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1176</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1142</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">13</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">14.21</pcFreeWater>
<comments>It must be emphasized, once again, that a descriptively adequate grammar may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic feature</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1087</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.5</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1003</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1185</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">14</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">13.56</pcFreeWater>
<comments>This suggests that the systematic use of complex symbols is unspecified with respect to an abstract underlying order.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-01-10T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>false</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>true</botPlug>
<plugBumped>true</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1066</presBump>
<floatHeld>false</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>true</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="724007e1-314c-11e1-a78c-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-10T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3112.19</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3161.15</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">681.43</presBopRating>
<mudClass>other</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.67</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.16</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.67</yp>
</fluid>
<fluid uid="724007e2-314c-11e1-90ff-5490384b2405">
<type>Mud Base</type>
<dTim>2011-01-10T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3391.55</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3305.22</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">670.6</presBopRating>
<mudClass>water based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.69</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.43</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">8.9</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="72402ef0-314c-11e1-a5e2-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>estimated</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.28</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3050.04</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3169.07</tvd>
</porePressure>
<porePressure uid="72402ef1-314c-11e1-b61a-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.43</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-01-10T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3023.79</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3141.76</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z">Notice, incidentally Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-10T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3093.68</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3009.31</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.34</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.13</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-10T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3167.59</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3152.95</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.08</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.38</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-10T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3135.9</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3086.55</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.23</incl>
<azi uom="dega">71.05</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3081.59</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3006.39</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.17</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.56</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-10T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3068.61</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3061.29</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.55</incl>
<azi uom="dega">78.02</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-01-10T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3150.86</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3010.38</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.19</incl>
<azi uom="dega">77.03</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="72407d11-314c-11e1-9548-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3077.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- hole open</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7240a421-314c-11e1-a0c1-5490384b2405">3178.37</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft So far, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not quite equivalent to a descriptive </comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7240a422-314c-11e1-821c-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3074.67</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7240cb2e-314c-11e1-b624-5490384b2405">3195.84</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the notion of l</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7240cb2f-314c-11e1-b4c1-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3081.53</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>fixed</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7240f240-314c-11e1-a111-5490384b2405">3113.8</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="7240f241-314c-11e1-ab19-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3067.19</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>wire line</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="7241194f-314c-11e1-9718-5490384b2405">3154.93</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Notice, incidentally, that relational information is not quite equivalent to the extended c-command </comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="72411950-314c-11e1-901c-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-01-10T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3011.78</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">0</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart uom="m" datum="72411951-314c-11e1-be7b-5490384b2405">3080.94</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Furthermore, the earlier discussion of deviance delimits nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive</comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="7241405e-314c-11e1-82b3-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2393.62</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2428.16</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1154</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1146</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">110.79</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">12.9</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4250.0</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1149</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="7241405f-314c-11e1-8a21-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2264.59</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2307.45</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1129</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1178</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">116.55</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">10.26</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4155.86</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1142</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="7241676e-314c-11e1-8949-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2349.8</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2023.87</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1174</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1117</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">103.91</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">19.26</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4240.02</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1147</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="72418e80-314c-11e1-b83e-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1576</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1702.13</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1424.85</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1742.93</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">299.25</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">98.44</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">200</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Suppose, for instance, that a case of se</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="72418e81-314c-11e1-913c-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1595</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1694.44</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1424.45</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1724.17</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">293.9</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">97.76</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">211</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH However, this assumption is not correct,</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="7241b58f-314c-11e1-bde5-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1507</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1518.75</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1485.25</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1795.22</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">250.34</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">92.19</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">224</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Summarizing, then, we assume that the ap</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="7241dc9e-314c-11e1-81ab-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>1</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1757.32</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1706.75</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1768.0</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1882.05</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">304.73</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.85</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.18</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.03</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.1</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.65</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">120.76</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">1</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.91</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">38.11</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">12</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">23</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">5</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">6</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">9.76</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">96.65</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">8.69</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">39.28</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="724203b0-314c-11e1-883b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>drill stem test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1700.11</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1801.76</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1706.52</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1750.37</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">322.46</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.21</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.14</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.38</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.06</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">8.34</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">133.64</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">38.76</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">38.16</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">10</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">23</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">6</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">4</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">4</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">6.53</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">97.49</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">8.18</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">34.39</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="72422ac0-314c-11e1-881a-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1527</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1419.68</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">15.64</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1531</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>water</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.22</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">2927.56</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH It must be emphasized, once again, that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition is not to be consi</description>
</formTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="724251cf-314c-11e1-8db0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1537</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1439.69</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">15.66</presPore>
<goodSeal>false</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1538</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>oil</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.58</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">5422.61</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Of course, the notion of level of grammaticalness does not readily tolerate a corpus of utterance to</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="724278e1-314c-11e1-bdb1-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1529</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1992.38</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1460.41</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1898.94</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows For one thing, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort may remedy and, at the same time, e</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains rela</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="72429ff0-314c-11e1-9032-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1546</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1936.78</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1447.23</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1831.99</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relat</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology Thus relational information suffices to account for irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional r</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="7242c700-314c-11e1-ad75-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2496.05</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1190</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- other</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">50</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. Furthermore, this selectionally introduced contextual feature does not affect the structure of the t</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="7242ee11-314c-11e1-bd50-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2472.75</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1165</tvd>
<equipClass>drill floor -- other</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">67</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic feature</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="72431521-314c-11e1-bef1-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3271.13</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3007.25</tvdInflow>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">492.89</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-10T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">6.68</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3209.14</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.25</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.4</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">5</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3289.16</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.3</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">87.81</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">84.24</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>water kick</incidentType>
<killingType>bullheading</killingType>
<formation>Note that the notion of level of grammat</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">122.05</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">86.58</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Note that relational information may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the strong generative capacity of the theory.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="72433c30-314c-11e1-a287-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T11:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3293.81</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3045.17</tvdInflow>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">491.15</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-01-10T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.56</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3279.53</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.88</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.66</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">5</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3237.62</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.38</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">83.55</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">88.97</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>oil kick</incidentType>
<killingType>wait and weight</killingType>
<formation>Of course, the theory of syntactic featu</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">131.36</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">80.78</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is necessary to impose an
interpretatio</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="72438a4f-314c-11e1-978f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3257.24</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3164.54</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Presumably, the descriptive power of the base component does not readily tolerat</description>
</stratInfo>
<stratInfo uid="72438a50-314c-11e1-86b5-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T15:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3252.2</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3146.06</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Of course, the notion of level of grammaticalness is, apparently, determined by </description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="7243b15e-314c-11e1-8658-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-10T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-10T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3399.87</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3342.72</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3256.38</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3241.18</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="7243b15f-314c-11e1-961d-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-01-10T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-01-10T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3388.64</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3349.87</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3206.17</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3268.36</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="7243d86e-314c-11e1-9101-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>no readings</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1443</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1812.54</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1447.42</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1819.15</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">71</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">31</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">5</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">6</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">7</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">6</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">9</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="7243d86f-314c-11e1-a53c-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-01-10T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1425</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1866.41</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1422.65</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1841.12</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">60</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">31</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">5</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">5</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">5</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">8</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">6</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">5</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>
\ No newline at end of file