data.posccaesar.org / npd

Go to a project
Toggle navigation Toggle navigation pinning
David Price
4d689908 1 parent ec32fb8e

Added complete DDR test from Roar

Inline Side-by-side
Showing 1 changed file with 632 additions and 0 deletions
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<drillReports version="1.4.0.0" xmlns="http://www.witsml.org/schemas/1series" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" >
<documentInfo>
<documentName namingSystem="ssss">Daily Drilling Report for 2011-06-01</documentName>
<documentAlias namingSystem="COPNO">COPNO Drill Report for 2011-06-01</documentAlias>
<documentAlias namingSystem="INTERNAL">DDR for 2011-06-01</documentAlias>
<documentDate>2011-06-02T00:00:00.0Z</documentDate>
<documentClass namingSystem="COPNO">PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<documentClass namingSystem="INTERNAL">CONFIDENTAL</documentClass>
<fileCreationInformation>
<fileCreationDate>2011-06-02T00:00:00.0Z</fileCreationDate>
<softwareName>TextPad</softwareName>
<fileCreator>Roar Vika</fileCreator>
<comment>Created by Magnus Svendson by using Dong software for randomization of real xml files, based on ConocoPhillips xml - Wellbore 2-4-X-43A -20-May-2010.xml</comment>
</fileCreationInformation>
<securityInformation uid="0a277d40-2707-11e1-ac50-5490384b2405">
<class>PARTNERCONFIDENTAL</class>
<securitySystem>CONFIDENTIAL</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-07-31T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: relational information may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual
gibberish (e.g. (98d)). Analogously, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial raises serious doubts about irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. So far, a
descriptiv</comment>
</securityInformation>
<securityInformation uid="0a27a44f-2707-11e1-8c43-5490384b2405">
<class>CONFIDENTIAL</class>
<securitySystem>RESTRICTEDDISTRIBUTION</securitySystem>
<endDate>2011-08-20T00:00:00.0Z</endDate>
<comment>Note that this selectionally introduced contextual feature may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. However, this assumption is not correct,</comment>
</securityInformation>
<disclaimer>Thus the natural general principle that will subsu</disclaimer>
<auditTrail>
<event uid="0a27f270-2707-11e1-b7d3-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-06-01T01:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>APPROVED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>To characterize a linguistic level L, a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. For one thing, the descriptive
power of the base component suffices to account for nond</comment>
</event>
<event uid="0a281980-2707-11e1-8dc0-5490384b2405">
<eventDate>2011-06-01T02:00:00.0Z</eventDate>
<eventType>RELEASED</eventType>
<responsibleParty>DRILLING Operator</responsibleParty>
<comment>To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), relational information delimits the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. It appears that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier
raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Fro</comment>
</event>
</auditTrail>
<owner>ConocoPhillips Norway</owner>
<comment>Daily Drilling Report Summarizing, then, w</comment>
</documentInfo>
<drillReport uidWell="0a28408f-2707-11e1-b709-5490384b2405" uidWellbore="0a2867a1-2707-11e1-8445-5490384b2405" uid="0a2867a2-2707-11e1-af71-5490384b2405">
<nameWell>2/4-X-4</nameWell>
<nameWellbore>2/4-X-4 A</nameWellbore>
<name>Daily Drilling Report for DDRTEST June 2011</name>
<dTimStart>2011-06-01T00:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-06-01T23:59:59.0Z</dTimEnd>
<versionKind>normal</versionKind>
<createDate>2011-06-02T00:00:00.0Z</createDate>
<wellAlias uid="1">
<name>2531-P</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="1">
<name>2/4-X-4 A</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellboreAlias uid="1">
<name>5069</name>
<namingSystem>NPD number</namingSystem>
</wellboreAlias>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="false" uid="0a2867a3-2707-11e1-848b-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Kelly Bushing</name>
<code>KB</code>
<datumName code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">On our assumptions, </datumName>
<kind>Rotary Table</kind>
<kind>ssss</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>--None--</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">42.59</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">62.48</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="0a288eb0-2707-11e1-97a3-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>Howev</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">16.91</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">6.34</longitude>
<original>false</original>
<description>For any transformati</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>Of course, the theor</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellDatum defaultVerticalDepth="true" defaultElevation="true" uid="0a28b5c0-2707-11e1-a5c7-5490384b2405" defaultMeasuredDepth="false">
<name>Sea Level</name>
<code>SL</code>
<datumName code="So" namingSystem="On">So fa</datumName>
<kind>Furth</kind>
<kind>So fa</kind>
<wellbore>
<wellboreReference>On th</wellboreReference>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</wellbore>
<rig>
<rigReference>NADANADA</rigReference>
<wellboreParent>--None--</wellboreParent>
<wellParent>2/4-X-4</wellParent>
</rig>
<elevation datum="SL" uom="m">608</elevation>
<measuredDepth datum="SL" uom="m">559</measuredDepth>
<horizontalLocation uid="0a2903e1-2707-11e1-a399-5490384b2405">
<wellCRS>well crs 76</wellCRS>
<latitude uom="dega">8.23</latitude>
<longitude uom="dega">17.54</longitude>
<original>true</original>
<description>For any transformation which is sufficie</description>
</horizontalLocation>
<comment>For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, an important property of these three types of EC is not subject to a general convention regarding the
forms of the grammar.</comment>
</wellDatum>
<wellCRS uid="0a292af0-2707-11e1-8daa-5490384b2405">
<name>ED50</name>
<geographic>
<geodeticDatumCode>ED50</geodeticDatumCode>
</geographic>
<description>However, this assumption is not correct, since the notion of level of grammaticalness is unspecified</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellCRS uid="0a292af1-2707-11e1-b239-5490384b2405">
<name>WGS84</name>
<mapProjection>
<nameCRS code="ssss" namingSystem="COPNO">I suggested that the</nameCRS>
<!-- start deprecated -->
<projectionCode>equidistant conic</projectionCode>
<projectedFrom>For one th</projectedFrom>
<stdParallel1 uom="dega">79.4</stdParallel1>
<stdParallel2 uom="dega">31.34</stdParallel2>
<centralMeridian uom="dega">5.3</centralMeridian>
<originLatitude uom="dega">45.65</originLatitude>
<originLongitude uom="dega">88.64</originLongitude>
<latitude1 uom="dega">71.81</latitude1>
<longitude1 uom="dega">59.18</longitude1>
<latitude2 uom="dega">47.54</latitude2>
<longitude2 uom="dega">96.64</longitude2>
<latitudeForScale uom="dega">80.28</latitudeForScale>
<longitudeForScale uom="dega">19.83</longitudeForScale>
<trueScaleLatitude uom="dega">66.95</trueScaleLatitude>
<spheroidRadius uom="m">570</spheroidRadius>
<scaleFactor>564</scaleFactor>
<methodVariant>default</methodVariant>
<perspectiveHeight uom="m">923</perspectiveHeight>
<zone>5N</zone>
<NADType>NAD27</NADType>
<falseEasting uom="m">179</falseEasting>
<falseNorthing uom="m">372</falseNorthing>
<bearing uom="dega">80.72</bearing>
<hemisphere>southern</hemisphere>
<description>With this clarification, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is u</description>
<parameter index="1111" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">ssss</parameter>
<parameter index="1111" description="ssss" name="ssss" uom="ssss">ssss</parameter>
<!-- endt deprecated -->
</mapProjection>
<description>It may be, then, that the systematic use of complex symbols appears to correlate rather closely with</description>
</wellCRS>
<wellboreInfo>
<dTimSpud>2011-06-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimSpud>
<dTimPreSpud>2011-06-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPreSpud>
<dateDrillComplete>2011-06-01</dateDrillComplete>
<operator>ConocoPhillips</operator>
<drillContractor>ODFJELL DRILLING MANAGEMENT AS</drillContractor>
<rigAlias uid="0a29a01e-2707-11e1-97be-5490384b2405">
<name>MÆRSK GIANT</name>
<namingSystem>NPD Name</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
<rigAlias uid="0a29a01f-2707-11e1-a5c3-5490384b2405">
<name>278245</name>
<namingSystem>NPD code</namingSystem>
</rigAlias>
</wellboreInfo>
<statusInfo uid="0a29a020-2707-11e1-b4a2-5490384b2405">
<reportNo>1</reportNo>
<dTim>2011-06-01T23:59:59.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3047.96</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3111.28</tvd>
<mdPlugTop datum="KB" uom="m">1441</mdPlugTop>
<diaHole uom="in">10.82</diaHole>
<mdDiaHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1259.53</mdDiaHoleStart>
<diaPilot uom="in">17.16</diaPilot>
<mdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1102</mdDiaPilotPlan>
<tvdDiaPilotPlan datum="KB" uom="m">1148</tvdDiaPilotPlan>
<typeWellbore>respud</typeWellbore>
<mdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1603.12</mdKickoff>
<tvdKickoff datum="KB" uom="m">1832.38</tvdKickoff>
<strengthForm uom="g/cm3">1187</strengthForm>
<mdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1107</mdStrengthForm>
<tvdStrengthForm datum="KB" uom="m">1173</tvdStrengthForm>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">3</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3066.57</mdCsgLast>
<tvdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3549.56</tvdCsgLast>
<presTestType>leak off test</presTestType>
<mdPlanned datum="KB" uom="m">0</mdPlanned>
<distDrill uom="m">23.73</distDrill>
<elevKelly datum="SL" uom="m">59.46</elevKelly>
<waterDepth uom="m">1086</waterDepth>
<sum24Hr>It may be, then, that the notion of level of grammaticalness cannot be arbitrary in the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.</sum24Hr>
<forecast24Hr>Thus the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, apparently, determined by the str</forecast24Hr>
<ropCurrent uom="m/h">1010</ropCurrent>
<tightWell>true</tightWell>
<hpht>false</hpht>
<avgPresBH uom="psig">1073</avgPresBH>
<avgTempBH uom="degC">1045</avgTempBH>
<fixedRig>true</fixedRig>
</statusInfo>
<bitRecord uid="0a29ee40-2707-11e1-a15a-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">7.89</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Hughes Christensen</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-22</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>I suggested that these results</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">14.39</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1230</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1506</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">10.93</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1157</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">19.52</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">11.86</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1096</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">199</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">14.56</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<bitRecord uid="0a2a154f-2707-11e1-a9b5-5490384b2405">
<numBit>3</numBit>
<diaBit uom="in">8.27</diaBit>
<manufacturer>Hughes Christensen</manufacturer>
<codeMfg>MX-23</codeMfg>
<dullGrade>Analogously, a subset of Engli</dullGrade>
<bitRun>
<eTimOpBit uom="h">11.66</eTimOpBit>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">1060</mdHoleStart>
<mdHoleStop datum="KB" uom="m">1589</mdHoleStop>
<ropAv uom="m/h">15.96</ropAv>
<mdHoleMadeRun datum="KB" uom="m">1166</mdHoleMadeRun>
<hrsDrilled uom="h">10.08</hrsDrilled>
<hrsDrilledRun uom="h">11.56</hrsDrilledRun>
<mdTotHoleMade datum="KB" uom="m">1388</mdTotHoleMade>
<totHrsDrilled uom="h">174</totHrsDrilled>
<totRop uom="m/h">16.21</totRop>
</bitRun>
</bitRecord>
<casing_liner_tubing>
<type>c</type>
<id uom="in">14.29</id>
<od uom="in">11.07</od>
<weight uom="lbm/ft">133</weight>
<grade>Conversely, the spea</grade>
<connection>Note that the appear</connection>
<length uom="m">1095</length>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1005</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1023</mdBottom>
<casing_liner_tubing_run>
<casingType>Top</casingType>
<description>Note that the earlier discussion of deviance delimits the strong generative capacity of the theory.</description>
<dTimStart>2011-06-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-06-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
</casing_liner_tubing_run>
</casing_liner_tubing>
<cementStage>
<dTimPumpStart>2011-06-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpStart>
<dTimPumpEnd>2011-06-01T12:00:00.0Z</dTimPumpEnd>
<jobType>unknown</jobType>
<casingStrDia uom="in">13.35</casingStrDia>
<comments>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is, apparently, determined by an
important distinction in language use.</comments>
<volReturns uom="m3">1005</volReturns>
<cementingFluid>
<typeFluid>Spacer</typeFluid>
<descFluid>Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that relatio</descFluid>
<ratioMixWater uom="galUS/sack94">1012</ratioMixWater>
<density uom="sg">2.8</density>
<volPumped uom="m3">1115</volPumped>
<yp uom="ft3/sack94">1137</yp>
<eTimThickening uom="h">11</eTimThickening>
<pcFreeWater uom="%">12.59</pcFreeWater>
<comments>Summarizing, then, we assume that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction cannot be arbitrary in a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity
has been defined by the paired utterance test.</comments>
</cementingFluid>
<dTimPresReleased>2011-06-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimPresReleased>
<annFlowAfter>true</annFlowAfter>
<topPlug>true</topPlug>
<botPlug>false</botPlug>
<plugBumped>false</plugBumped>
<presBump uom="bar">1126</presBump>
<floatHeld>true</floatHeld>
<reciprocated>false</reciprocated>
<rotated>false</rotated>
</cementStage>
<fluid uid="0a2ad89e-2707-11e1-bb08-5490384b2405">
<type>Oil Base</type>
<dTim>2011-06-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3436.73</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3445.34</tvd>
<presBopRating uom="bar">698.45</presBopRating>
<mudClass>oil based</mudClass>
<density uom="g/cm3">1.51</density>
<pv uom="Pa.s">0.56</pv>
<yp uom="Pa">7.3</yp>
</fluid>
<porePressure uid="0a2ad89f-2707-11e1-86ac-5490384b2405">
<readingKind>measured</readingKind>
<equivalentMudWeight uom="g/cm3">1.8</equivalentMudWeight>
<dTim>2011-06-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3047.31</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3119.17</tvd>
</porePressure>
<extendedReport dTim="2011-06-01T04:00:00.0Z">Conversely, this sel Circulate well to even MW 12.0ppg</extendedReport>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-06-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3154.89</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3109.07</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.67</incl>
<azi uom="dega">79.79</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-06-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3113.62</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3022.09</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.45</incl>
<azi uom="dega">76.33</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-06-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3123.59</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3137.15</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.99</incl>
<azi uom="dega">73.16</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-06-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3174.5</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3091.44</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.73</incl>
<azi uom="dega">76.83</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-06-01T05:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3035.85</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3162.44</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.36</incl>
<azi uom="dega">74.47</azi>
</surveyStation>
<surveyStation>
<dTim>2011-06-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3050.96</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3193.15</tvd>
<incl uom="dega">0.35</incl>
<azi uom="dega">70.94</azi>
</surveyStation>
<activity uid="0a2b4dcf-2707-11e1-8665-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-06-01T02:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-06-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3009.48</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">2909.33</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- trip</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">2500.00</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>operation failed</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft From C1, it follows that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition suffices to account for a general</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="0a2b74e1-2707-11e1-8b98-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-06-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-06-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3167.41</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">2354.14</tvd>
<phase>coil</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">3009.48</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>success</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft We have already seen that a descriptively adequate grammar may remedy and, at the same time, elimina</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="0a2b74e2-2707-11e1-928f-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-06-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-06-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3356.83</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">2945.55</tvd>
<phase>snub</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drive</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">3167.41</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>stuck equipment</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Summarizing, then, we assume that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier may remedy and,</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="0a2b9bf0-2707-11e1-9a96-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-06-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-06-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3698.63</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">2387.55</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- casing</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">3356.83</mdHoleStart>
<state>fail</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft Thus the notion of level of grammaticalness is not quite equivalent to the levels of acceptability f</comments>
</activity>
<activity uid="0a2bc300-2707-11e1-b8fa-5490384b2405">
<dTimStart>2011-06-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimStart>
<dTimEnd>2011-06-01T16:00:00.0Z</dTimEnd>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">3140.25</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">3122.11</tvd>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- drill</proprietaryCode>
<mdHoleStart datum="KB" uom="m">3156.83</mdHoleStart>
<state>ok</state>
<stateDetailActivity>kick</stateDetailActivity>
<comments>RIH from 4124ft to 10384ft It appears that the speaker-hearer&#39;s linguistic intuition can be defined in such a way as to impose </comments>
</activity>
<logInfo uid="0a2bea11-2707-11e1-b052-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2427.67</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2399.81</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1103</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1145</tvdBottom>
<tool>Gamma</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">107.49</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">14.98</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4236.46</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1159</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="0a2bea12-2707-11e1-b49a-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>4</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Seadrill</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2067.21</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2412.13</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1179</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1179</tvdBottom>
<tool>Acoustic</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">111.35</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">10.26</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4028.44</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1177</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<logInfo uid="0a2c1121-2707-11e1-a5f5-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T06:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<runNumber>1</runNumber>
<serviceCompany>Aker Drilling</serviceCompany>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">2111.17</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">2093.71</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1197</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KBx" uom="m">1124</tvdBottom>
<tool>Electrical</tool>
<tempBHST uom="degC">107.06</tempBHST>
<eTimStatic uom="h">16.97</eTimStatic>
<mdTempTool uom="m">4187.86</mdTempTool>
<tvdTempTool datum="KB" uom="m">1196</tvdTempTool>
</logInfo>
<coreInfo uid="0a2c3830-2707-11e1-81d0-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T09:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>3</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1538</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1665.59</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1450.42</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1765.5</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">283.07</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">92.21</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">204</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>fiberglass</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH However, this assumption is not correct,</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="0a2c5f40-2707-11e1-9ce1-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1521</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1793.09</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1451.34</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1705.81</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">270.7</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">92.07</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">205</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>aluminum</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Nevertheless, a subset of English senten</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<coreInfo uid="0a2c5f41-2707-11e1-944b-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<coreNumber>4</coreNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1599</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1553.74</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1480.46</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1778.31</tvdBottom>
<lenRecovered uom="m">264.07</lenRecovered>
<recoverPc uom="%">90.73</recoverPc>
<lenBarrel uom="m">202</lenBarrel>
<innerBarrelType>gel</innerBarrelType>
<coreDescription>testing core no 1 data for ERH Analogously, the speaker-hearer&#39;s lingui</coreDescription>
</coreInfo>
<wellTestInfo uid="0a2c864f-2707-11e1-8e36-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T01:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<testType>production test</testType>
<testNumber>2</testNumber>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1749.45</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1867.31</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1813.88</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1764.15</tvdBottom>
<chokeOrificeSize uom="mm">319.02</chokeOrificeSize>
<densityOil uom="g/cm3">0.88</densityOil>
<densityWater uom="g/cm3">1.25</densityWater>
<densityGas uom="g/cm3">0.76</densityGas>
<flowRateOil uom="m3/d">8.45</flowRateOil>
<flowRateWater uom="m3/d">7.71</flowRateWater>
<flowRateGas uom="M(m3)/d">131.44</flowRateGas>
<presShutIn uom="MPa">3</presShutIn>
<presFlowing uom="MPa">39.69</presFlowing>
<presBottom uom="MPa">39.11</presBottom>
<gasOilRatio uom="m3/m3">14</gasOilRatio>
<waterOilRatio uom="m3/m3">22</waterOilRatio>
<chloride uom="ppm">5</chloride>
<carbonDioxide uom="ppm">6</carbonDioxide>
<hydrogenSulfide uom="ppm">5</hydrogenSulfide>
<volOilTotal uom="m3">7.49</volOilTotal>
<volGasTotal uom="M(m3)">95.9</volGasTotal>
<volWaterTotal uom="m3">6.1</volWaterTotal>
<volOilStored uom="m3">39.05</volOilStored>
</wellTestInfo>
<formTestInfo uid="0a2cd46e-2707-11e1-b1dc-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">1504</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1426.73</tvd>
<presPore uom="MPa">15.87</presPore>
<goodSeal>true</goodSeal>
<mdSample uom="m">1510</mdSample>
<dominateComponent>gas</dominateComponent>
<densityHC uom="g/cm3">1.17</densityHC>
<volumeSample uom="dm3">21565.59</volumeSample>
<description>Testing of the Formation Test Information to ERH Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the app</description>
</formTestInfo>
<lithShowInfo uid="0a2cfb80-2707-11e1-b55f-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T04:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1504</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1995.26</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1492.07</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1872.6</tvdBottom>
<show>Shows A consequence of the approach just outlined is that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets o</show>
<lithology>Description of lithology It must be emphasized, once again, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features i</lithology>
</lithShowInfo>
<equipFailureInfo uid="0a2d228f-2707-11e1-9727-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T08:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<md datum="KB" uom="m">2516.72</md>
<tvd datum="KB" uom="m">1170</tvd>
<equipClass>hoisting equ -- crown block</equipClass>
<eTimMissProduction uom="min">84</eTimMissProduction>
<dTimRepair>2011-06-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimRepair>
<description>Leak when attempting to leak test to 5000 psi. Repair same. For one thing, the earlier discussion of deviance appears to correlate rather closely with irrelevan</description>
</equipFailureInfo>
<controlIncidentInfo uid="0a2d499e-2707-11e1-9294-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3262.84</mdInflow>
<tvdInflow datum="KB" uom="m">3061.33</tvdInflow>
<phase>bop test</phase>
<proprietaryCode>drilling -- underream</proprietaryCode>
<eTimLost uom="min">475.89</eTimLost>
<dTimRegained>2011-06-01T11:00:00.0Z</dTimRegained>
<diaBit uom="in">7.53</diaBit>
<mdBit uom="m">3256.07</mdBit>
<wtMud uom="g/cm3">1.49</wtMud>
<porePressure uom="g/cm3">1.2</porePressure>
<diaCsgLast uom="in">5</diaCsgLast>
<mdCsgLast datum="KB" uom="m">3207.26</mdCsgLast>
<volMudGained uom="m3">1.15</volMudGained>
<presShutInCasing uom="bar">86.89</presShutInCasing>
<presShutInDrill uom="bar">88.35</presShutInDrill>
<incidentType>shallow gas kick</incidentType>
<killingType>drillers method</killingType>
<formation>We will bring evidence in favor of the f</formation>
<tempBottom uom="degC">122.58</tempBottom>
<presMaxChoke uom="bar">88.31</presMaxChoke>
<description>Drilled out 7 3/4" Notice, incidentally, that an important property of these three types of EC is to be regarded as irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.</description>
</controlIncidentInfo>
<stratInfo uid="0a2d97c0-2707-11e1-b448-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3246.19</mdTop>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3170.16</tvdTop>
<description>Preliminary stratigraphy test Of course, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is, apparen</description>
</stratInfo>
<perfInfo uid="0a2d97c1-2707-11e1-a48f-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-06-01T10:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-06-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3394.47</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3378.48</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3219.03</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3288.81</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<perfInfo uid="0a2dbecf-2707-11e1-a9f2-5490384b2405">
<dTimOpen>2011-06-01T14:00:00.0Z</dTimOpen>
<dTimClose>2011-06-01T19:00:00.0Z</dTimClose>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">3361.0</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">3390.49</mdBottom>
<tvdTop uom="m">3283.33</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom uom="m">3258.51</tvdBottom>
</perfInfo>
<gasReadingInfo uid="0a2dbed0-2707-11e1-beae-5490384b2405">
<dTim>2011-06-01T03:00:00.0Z</dTim>
<readingType>connection gas</readingType>
<mdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1440</mdTop>
<mdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1877.12</mdBottom>
<tvdTop datum="KB" uom="m">1406.89</tvdTop>
<tvdBottom datum="KB" uom="m">1814.1</tvdBottom>
<gasHigh uom="%">64</gasHigh>
<gasLow uom="%">38</gasLow>
<meth uom="ppm">9</meth>
<eth uom="ppm">5</eth>
<prop uom="ppm">6</prop>
<ibut uom="ppm">6</ibut>
<nbut uom="ppm">8</nbut>
<ipent uom="ppm">6</ipent>
</gasReadingInfo>
</drillReport>
</drillReports>