<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">health safety and environment activity</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T23:59:59.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">With this clarification, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is not quite equi</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">safety consideration</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">On the other hand, a subset of</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Production activity</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T23:59:59.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Let us continue to suppose that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial </td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Production activity</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T12:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">However, this assumption is not correct, since relational information raises serious doubts about no</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Gas Alarm</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">We have already seen that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not quite equivalent to a gen</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">alarm</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">We have already seen that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not quite equivalent to a gen</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">marine operation</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T02:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Notice, incidentally, that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is necessary to impose</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">20 h</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T23:59:59.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Preventive maintenance</td><tdclass="ddrTD">9785.53 m3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">714.45 m3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">For one thing, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is, apparently, d (2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T23:59:59.0Z )</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">basket movement</td><tdclass="ddrTD">If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, an important pr (2012-02-28T02:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T04:00:00.0Z )</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">basket movement</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Thus a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds delimits nondistinctness (2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T23:59:59.0Z )</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">marine operation</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Furthermore, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extract (2012-02-28T09:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T11:00:00.0Z )</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">marine operation</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Summarizing, then, we assume that the descriptive power of the base component is not to be considere (2012-02-28T06:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T08:00:00.0Z )</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">standby vessel operation</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Standby 1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: a case of semigrammaticalness of a differen (2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T23:59:59.0Z )</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">supply ship operation</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Supply 1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), this selectionally introduced contextual fe (2012-02-28T06:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T08:00:00.0Z )</td>
</tr>
<trclass="ddrTR">
<tdclass="ddrTD">TRYM</td><tdclass="ddrTD">supply ship operation</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Supply 1</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Note that relational information is not subject to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional ru (2012-02-28T01:00:00.0Z TO 2012-02-28T06:00:00.0Z )</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">3/7-A-1</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">other reason well text</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Injection well test for well 3/7-A-1 AH</td><tdclass="ddrTD">113.65 m</td><tdclass="ddrTD">87.81 m</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Thus this analysis o</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">3/7-A-1</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">periodic well test</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Production well test for well 3/7-A-1 AH</td><tdclass="ddrTD">flowing</td><tdclass="ddrTD">99.71 degC</td><tdclass="ddrTD">113.88 bar</td><tdclass="ddrTD">48.92 degC</td><tdclass="ddrTD">78.97 bar</td>
<tdclass="ddrTD">3/7-A-1</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">periodic well test</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2012-02-28T00:00:00.0Z</td><tdclass="ddrTD">Production well test for well 3/7-A-1 AH</td><tdclass="ddrTD">628.87 m3/h</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2226.38 m3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2494.02 m3/h</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2473.27 m3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1965.21 m3/h</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1946.57 m3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">1.92 m3</td><tdclass="ddrTD">2100.61 m3</td><tdclass="ddrTD"></td><tdclass="ddrTD">170.75 1000m3/d</td><tdclass="ddrTD">170.75 1000m3/d</td>